Murph Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 Fake News Media is suddenly afraid of the violence that they have spent six months encouraging. Maybe they are looking at what they and the demokkkrats created and are starting to realize that perhaps they made an error. https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2020/11/02/the-morning-briefing-enemy-of-the-people-msm-suddenly-worried-about-violence-it-spent-6-months-ignoring-n1112003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 PA AG now worried his exposing of the vote fraud machine might have some consequences, is walking it back: https://www.dailywire.com/news/pa-dem-atty-gen-just-boasted-biden-would-win-pa-suddenly-hes-changing-his-tune If the Demokkkrats win, they will have stolen the election, and Harris-Biden will never be legitimate. But if they win, the gulags go into high speed operation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 True, so true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKTanker Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 10 minutes ago, Murph said: PA AG now worried his exposing of the vote fraud machine might have some consequences, is walking it back: https://www.dailywire.com/news/pa-dem-atty-gen-just-boasted-biden-would-win-pa-suddenly-hes-changing-his-tune If the Demokkkrats win, they will have stolen the election, and Harris-Biden will never be legitimate. But if they win, the gulags go into high speed operation. He walked it back, well sort of. We have to understand what he said and meant within the context of the John Robert's court greenlighting ballot fraud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 1 minute ago, DKTanker said: He walked it back, well sort of. We have to understand what he said and meant within the context of the John Robert's court greenlighting ballot fraud. Point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 On 11/2/2020 at 6:27 AM, Murph said: Ain't this the truth! Might as well add A.B.C., C.B.S., N.P.R., and P.B.S. The only shield would by Moody Radio and A.M. radio conservative hosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 Supreme leader Gavin Newsom just had his wings clipped by a California Judge! Amazing. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2020/11/02/a-judge-just-dethroned-californias-covid-dictator-gavin-newsom-n1116873 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stargrunt6 Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmgill Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 I want to see the booking photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 This is what passes for rational, legitimate thinking for the Left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmgill Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 One of the things that I have been puzzling over is this: The Left is outraged that there's negative police encounters that result in black men being killed by the cops for what ever reasons they may be. The left's candidate wants to push assault weapons in to the NFA category meaning that possession and sale would be heavily restricted and regulated with the necessary taxes paid for each transfer. What sort of police interactions do they think will result from such enforcement interactions? Is the ATF suddenly going to not shoot people they think they need to because they haven't paid that $200 tax? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stargrunt6 Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 hour ago, rmgill said: I want to see the booking photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikel2 Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Stargrunt6 said: She wanted more government and she got more government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EchoFiveMike Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 hour ago, rmgill said: One of the things that I have been puzzling over is this: The Left is outraged that there's negative police encounters that result in black men being killed by the cops for what ever reasons they may be. The left's candidate wants to push assault weapons in to the NFA category meaning that possession and sale would be heavily restricted and regulated with the necessary taxes paid for each transfer. What sort of police interactions do they think will result from such enforcement interactions? Is the ATF suddenly going to not shoot people they think they need to because they haven't paid that $200 tax? The left is always, ALWAYS about "who-whom." The only consistency is that it's always about whatever is the worse for White(northern European the worst!) Christian heterosexual men. Once you understand that framing, it makes somewhat logical sense. Not perfect, because they're insane, but you can make guesses on trends, like watching the guy picking up change at the McDonald's drive through at 3AM. S/F....Ken M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Tan Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 Isn't spitting at someone Attempted Murder in COVIDtimes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmgill Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 35 minutes ago, EchoFiveMike said: The left is always, ALWAYS about "who-whom." The only consistency is that it's always about whatever is the worse for White(northern European the worst!) Christian heterosexual men. Once you understand that framing, it makes somewhat logical sense. Not perfect, because they're insane, but you can make guesses on trends, like watching the guy picking up change at the McDonald's drive through at 3AM. S/F....Ken M Yeah. But even there, it's going to involve MORE ATF raids in urban districts with more arrests over illegally possessed firearms with all of the relevant shootings such things involve. Its just like the left complaining about Imperialistic Wars and Trump in the same sentence while they then talk about support for Biden. It's like watching a woman stuff her face with cake, pie and potato chips while complaining that she's too fat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 6 minutes ago, Simon Tan said: Isn't spitting at someone Attempted Murder in COVIDtimes? Assault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Stargrunt6 said: Whoa those eyes..... never stick your d*ck in crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Tan Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 How do I defend myself against assault? Is lethal force justified? Especially since I was in fear for my life...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmgill Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 https://nypost.com/2020/11/05/revolving-door-justice-for-phlegm-fatale-shows-contempt-for-cops/?fbclid=IwAR1xBQc5NASTAgj-SyAeAbk-z3t8MVXaur3e-IdWg1WqkL5AB-qJyvM39oU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stargrunt6 Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 Phlegm Fatale... lol... I'm not over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 Demokkkrats make their move to ensure there is never a free election again: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) outlined a few key objectives Congress will pursue on the “first day” of the 117th Congress, promising to pass H.R.1, an “election reform” bill Republicans warn will enable even greater voter fraud. In a letter to her colleagues on Friday in which she formally requested their support to reelect her as speaker of the House, Pelosi said Democrats will prioritize “championing progress” for LGBTQ Americans, women, seniors, and frontline communities, as well as “remove barriers to the ballot box so that the American people can make their voices heard” in the 117th Congress. “Our Democratic House will proudly pass our election reform, anti-corruption, and voting rights legislation by passing H.R.1 on the first day of the new Congress,” she vowed in the letter. Democrats tried to advance H.R.1, also known as the “For the People Act,” last year, which specifically “expands voter registration and voting access and limits removing voters from voter rolls,” according to a summary of the bill. A “Memo to the Movement” from the Conservative Action Project highlighted a number of the objectives outlined in the bill, which includes the criminalization of political speech and the automatic registration of voters. “Conservatives are united in opposing H.R. 1, the attempt by House Democrats to fundamentally undermine the American electoral system,” the memo stated. As Breitbart News reported at the time: Pelosi’s legislation is a massive federal power grab away from the states. The Constitution gives primary authority to the sovereign states to conduct elections. This bill empowers the federal government to micromanage elections by requiring states to get “preclearance” from Washington, D.C., before changing their election procedures. H.R. 1 also mandates countless millions of taxpayer dollars be given to candidates for their campaigns, requiring citizens to fund candidates who those citizens actually oppose for office. Additionally, it: Forces all states to allow all convicted felons to vote. Requires all states to allow same-day voter registration, which leads to voter fraud. Makes it difficult for a state to discover if a voter is also voting in another state. Prevents states from limiting early voting.Prevents states from limiting voting by mail. Requires all states to provide free mail-in absentee ballots. Criminalizes political speech that the government deems “discouraging” to voters who are statistically more likely to vote Democrat. Takes redistricting away from elected leaders to give to left-leaning commissions. Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Mo Brooks (R-AL) were among those who publicly stood against the Democrats’ measure, which passed in the House last year in a 234-193 vote. “As a backdrop, let me emphasize that the long term goal of Socialist Democrats is to dilute and undermine the voting power of American citizens,” Brooks warned at the time, adding that the legislation “does its best to exploit and expand voter fraud loopholes”: How do we know that? By past Socialist Democrat actions and conduct. For example, in many parts of America where Socialist Democrats enjoy dominant political control, they have made it lawful for illegal aliens and lawful noncitizens to vote, thereby diluting the vote of American citizens and undermining the ability of Americans to run their own governments! San Francisco is the largest such city, where illegal aliens and all other noncitizens can not only lawfully register to vote, they in fact vote in local elections. Further, H.R. 1 does its best to exploit and expand voter fraud loopholes that Socialist Democrats slipped into past federal legislation that, for example, empowered as many as 95,000 noncitizens to register to vote, and 58,000 noncitizens to actually vote, in recent Texas elections. Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN) recently resurrected the Democrats’ devotion to advancing the legislation in light of the controversial presidential election. “Democrats always planned to use mail-in ballots to sway this election. That’s why they intro’d & passed HR1 (their #1 priority) when Pelosi took House majority in early 2019 (long before pandemic),” Banks said. “If it had passed every state election would look like PA, WI and MI right now!!” he warned: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKTanker Posted November 7, 2020 Share Posted November 7, 2020 (edited) Foretold is forewarned, Comrades. Going forward, be wary of who you support, The Party will not condone dissension. Edited November 7, 2020 by DKTanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now