rmgill

VE Day?

Nodding to Rich Hy here. Cause you know, he might have a few useful ideas here...

What will your Labour masters say to that? I thought women and men were the same according to the left? Truely, for self defense, the disparity of force/horsepower between men and women is why I teach folks to use firearms for self defense. I know you've never fired a firearm before, but can you tell me what's more surprising than a 9mm round to the face for an attacker? That's very quaint. Any self defense instructor is going to tell you that's a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe you can equip the British army with Matchbooks for close combat instead of rifles and bayonets. Can you carry a Fairburn Sykes legally?

Maybe a fundamental understanding of differences in self defense in various nations. Yes. It's ALL Based on that one video. Not repeated conversations with many other people including Banshee when he came over for the I&I in 2015 NOR conversations with folks in the re-enacting and collecting community for WWII Military for more than 30 years, many of whom are in Europe. Given Germany heavily regulate firearms and prohibits the carrying of stun guns/tasers as self defense items as well as knives, what can you assert is considered reasonable in the scope of self defense in Germany. Since you're straw manning my post heavily? Do tell. If confronted with an assailant with a knife who wishes to stab you in the heart, what are YOUR options? Mine are legally use of a handgun (Semi-, revolver, single shot, etc). Or with a knife. Or with a club. Or with a taser. Or with a rifle (bolt, semi, lever, etc) or with a shotgun (semi-, pump, single, break, etc). None of those require a permit to possess and some require a license to carry, others do not. What are your legal options.

Huh? They can now. Well, if you had some patriotism. Not really. Look at the US Army's change in recruitment with Trump vs the past administration. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/02/07/us-army-recruitment-surges/ Weren't you complaining about the US using the UK as sepoys? You're now saying that the UK MUST use sepoys from the colonies in order to have a military. Funny.

Our education system is partially fake.

The problem is not improvised self defense. Its the idea from numpties who write policy thinking its an acceptable substitute in the face of rape gangs and predatory criminals the state of imports wholesale. Let me send you on safari to Canada in polar bear country. We will issue you an air horn, a towel and a paper bag. The air horn is to let the bears know where you are. The towel is so you can wrap it around your face and neck and the paper bag is so you can cover yourself like when the Vogons showed up to make their hyperspace bypass. I am reasonably ok with Japan’s arms policies because predatory crime is almost unheard of there. And their legal system doesn’t fuck around with violent criminals. In the west our liberal ‘betters’ want us to live with the polar bears and import more. Naah. If I am Confronted with a man with a knife intent on harm, I am putting two rounds of .40 jhp in center of mass and another in his head if he doesn’t stop. Rinse repeat. Thats the Mozambique drill, you should look it up.

Are Germans Hoopy Froods who really know where their towels are?

They were hunter gatherers in 8000 BC (Cheddar man was from circa 8150 BC). 4000 BC was about when farming was introduced in the south east. https://www.britannica.com/place/United-Kingdom/Ancient-Britain

More of a Blue Thunder stomping grounds....

And anyone poopooing this in the past needs to go sit in the corner and think about their inability to spot the obvious.

Yes. There was a great bloody crunch in population during the ice age, with some populations hanging on by the skin of their teeth and mixing with other haplogroups as they came in. Just look at the Sami people of Northern https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Sami. Frankly at this point. All the Brits making acknowledgements to indigenous peoples need to get down on their hands and knees and acknowledge the Irish and Scots early peoples.

If Ford Prefect was a Dumcomf Deutschländer

It's right there, lest you come across as a complete ignoramus. Also, I'll point out that there are ROE's that are not in the stated ROE. But you can STILL be held accountable for them.

Yes. We know, humans moved around. Yes, we know, the British Isles had an influx of peoples going back nearly 10,000 years to when Doggerland was a land and not Dogger Bank. All that is beside the point. We're talking about modern times. Modern eras and where we have nations, laws, nationality and costs and duties associated with citizenship and citizenship means something. If you want to be a hunter gatherer and go by hunter gatherer rules, you're so far beyond rational you make the Sovereign Citizen types seem SANE. This trans-national, post national nonsense doesn't make any seems unless someone can opt OUT of tax obligations (which they CAN'T) while others get to opt into benefits without having to pay a dime in taxes just by showing up and saying "feed me".