RETAC21

About a 100

Actually, the situation is as clear as mud. The idiotic Sumar/Podemos politicians denounced the Borkum on the basis of this EUC: Ammo cannot be going to Israel, because as we all know, 125mm ammo can only be used by Soviet guns, but the date is 31st May 2023, so it may refer to a previous shipment. On the other hand, it makes sense to be quiet about it if the supplier is India, as presumably they don't want Russia displeased with them, even though the don't GAS and will certainly sell to both sides for a pretty penny. The ship carrying explosives to Israel is the Marianne Danica, which has been denied entry, which means they will have to refuel somewhere else, so no drama either.

Apparently, much more of an engineer than you. To be valid, the comparison would be: I have a diesel engined car, I will put gas on it and hope that it runs for 100 Km without breaking down.

You are seriously obtuse and childish, you claimed there are non-binary solutions that can be applied. I asked for proof that they would work, you showed none, so, of course they didn't happen. It's just BS you are peddling like its some kind of hindsight. Just to be clear.

And I requested from you examples of where and when you non-binary options have worked, anywhere, anytime; you provided none other than your non-binary BS mantra.

That's your hope and just that. You don't can't point to anywhere where that worked then, m'kay.

And that has worked where? not in the West Bank... not in Southern Lebanon...

Ok, convince me, which of your non-binary solutions have worked?

Because they have worked so well in the past... 🙄

No, if you think about it, the PA is way weaker now than in 2007, so that would play into Hamas hand and will destabilize the WB too. An Arab peace force is not going to die for Israel, even if there was a will to send them there, leaving Hamas free to come back. Fragmenting Gaza into clans will play into Hamas hands by creating power differentials that they could exploit. "Israel, USA, Arab nations agree on a mechanism to install a new government in Gaza under their supervision for a few years, after which it gains autonomy - does anyone think they won't eventually turn into terrorists?" - may be, most likely not, if properly done - The Germans have not turned into Nazis when the occupation ended.

No, there aren't and there weren't. There are choices, some will be painful now but will solve the problem, some will be less painful now and much more painful down the road. The only one that will solve the problem now and forever is annihilation and that's just not possible.

Yep, COIN 101, it takes time and effort.

1) In fact, Spain remained a Kingdom during Franco's regime, just one without King, and Franco wanted a Borbón to take over when he died, the question being which one, with several options all with similar rights, going from the Italian Borbón-Parma Carlist heirs (one far right, one far left), Alfonso de Borbón (whose father was second in line to Alfonso XII but was deaf and was asked to renounce when the Principe de Asturias married a non-royal woman) and the sons of Juan (3rd in line of Alfonso XII that jumped to the first place but Franco couldn't stand). Nothing was preordained before 1969 and was subject to change if there was a faux pas before Franco died. 2) No so astonishing if you take into account this happened over 40 years. The first 15 years were an unmitigated disaster blamed on WW2 and isolation, but there was plenty of economic non-sense going on internally in trying to set up an autarchical regime. In 1953 the regime was saved with US credits, but promptly it was broke when an artificial exchange rate was maintained, and it required a "stabilisation plan" which essentially meant unbridled capitalism, and then Spain took off. By that time, Franco recognized that he was out of his depth in economics and appointed technocrat ministers while keeping the reins of political power. There were still some blunders (The Ifni war of 1956, the piss poor handling of the Sahara question) as well as some agreements with the US that were, at least, questionable, but the overall picture ended up being positive since it created an educated middle class and modernized the country. The regime outlasted it usefulness after Carrero was murdered, but in the end, it committed suicide by itself, with no revolution.

Fascism wasn't an integral part of the Franco regime, which, at its core, was the regime of a single military man, supported by the Army, the Catholic Church and the middle classes. When in the 60s the Catholic Church started distancing itself from the regime, the middle classes were large enough that the regime remained stable but it died with Franco. No effort at all was made to set up a proper single party state despite the creation of the FET JONS and the look alike Fascist regime. Franco chose who had power and who didn't and the fascist and Carlists were soon sidelined.

Another outstanding post at thinpinstripled blog: https://thinpinstripedline.blogspot.com/2024/05/hms-challenger-warship-that-never-was.html And what went wrong:

You are welcome, but the work was done by the editors of the Lexikon and Google translate

501 heavy tank battalion: "On September 9, 1943, Heavy tank battalion 501 was reorganized in Paderborn. The remains of the old battalion were also used for this purpose. On September 18, the detachment was moved to Sagan and from there to Mailly-le-Camp in France in mid-October. By November 12, 1943, 45 "Tigers" had been added to the battalion. From December 5th to 12th, 1943 the battalion was relocated to Vitebsk in Russia. In June 1944 the remaining "Tigers" were handed over to the Heavy tank battalion 509. The battalion moved to Germany to be equipped with the new "Tiger 2". By August 7, 1944, 45 "Tiger 2s" had been added to the battalion." 502 heavy tank battalion: "On August 1, 1944, 12 of the 37 Tigers were operational. On October 4, 1944, the battalion received the order to relocate to Germany to re-equip with Tiger II. On October 9, 1944, the 1st and 2nd companies reached the Memel. The 3rd Company remains in the Courland Pocket with 8 Tigers and is subordinated to the 510 Heavy Panzer battalion . On November 12, 1944, the 3rd Company transferred the 6 remaining Tigers to Heavy Panzer battalion 510 and moved them to Libau to be shipped. On December 16, 1944, 2 Tigers from the Großdeutschland heavy tank battalion reached the department. On December 17, 1944, the 3rd company also reached the Sennelager military training area . On January 21, 1945, parts of the detachment were embarked near Pillau. On January 31, 1945, the battalion was renamed Panzer battalion 511 ." 503 heavy tank battalion: "On June 1, 1944, the department was refreshed at the Ohrdruf military training area in Thuringia. From June 11th to 17th, 1944, the department was re-equipped with 33 Tiger Is and 12 Tiger IIs. The department moved to France by July 7th, 1944. On July 18, 1944, the 3rd Company is bombed during Operation Goodwood, but only 2 Tigers are destroyed. 13 tigers are destroyed throughout the day. From July 20th to 29th, 1944, the 3rd Company was moved to Mailly-le-Camp to be equipped with Tiger II. On August 12, 1944, the 3rd company moved to Paris. Here the majority of the company is destroyed by Allied air raids. The rest will be destroyed during the withdrawal from Normandy. Only 2 Tiger IIs can be saved." 504 heavy tank battalion seems to have had only Tiger Is during its existence 505 heavy tank battalion: "From July 11th to 12th, 1944 the battalion moved to Ohrdruf to be equipped with Tiger II. The department was then equipped with 45 Tiger IIs between July 26, 1944 and August 29, 1944." 506 heavy tank battalion: "On July 27th and 28th, 1944, the 6 remaining Tigers were handed over to the heavy tank battalion 507 . On August 15, 1944, the order was issued to relocate to Ohrdruf to be equipped with Tiger IIs. Between August 20, 1944 and September 12, 1944, the battalion was equipped with 45 Tiger IIs." 507 heavy tank battalion: "Between February 12 and 15, 1945, the department moved to the Sennelager military training area without the 1st company to be equipped with Tiger IIs. Between March 19 and 22, 1945 the department was equipped with 21 Tiger IIs." 508 heavy tank battalion: "On February 12, 1945, the remaining 15 Tigers were transferred to Heavy Panzer battalion 504. The personnel will be relocated to Germany to be re-equipped with Tiger II. However, the new tanks will no longer be transferred. Instead, parts of the battalion are “burned up” in infantry operations." 509 heavy tank battalion: "On April 19, 1944, only 2 of the 29 Tigers were still operational. In May 1944, the battalion moved by rail to Kolomia, Hungary, to train Hungarian Tiger crews. In June 1944, the used Tigers were handed over to the Hungarians, in return for which battalion received 9 Tigers from Heavy Tank battalion 501 . In total, the battalion has 46 new tigers. Between July 14 and 16, 1944, the battalion relocated near Lublin, Poland. Here the battalion is subordinate to the 1st Hungarian Army. There the remaining Tigers were handed over to the heavy tank battalion 501 on September 8, 1944 . The personnel are transferred to Germany to be equipped with Tiger II. Between December 5, 1944 and January 1, 1945, the battalion received 45 Tiger IIs and was relocated to Hungary from January 12, 1945." 510 heavy tank battalion: "On March 19, 1945, the remaining Tigers with the 18th Army in Courland were formed into a combat group; the rest of the department was to be evacuated from the Courland Pocket by sea. On March 30, 1945, the 3rd company in Kassel received 6 new Tiger IIs and was thrown into defensive fighting near Kassel on April 2, 1945." Heavy tank battalion Feldherrnhalle "The battalion was set up on December 21, 1944. The department was formed from the heavy tank department 503 as a corps force with 3 companies and subordinated to the Feldherrnhalle tank corps . In March 1945 the department was in action in the Vereleby area. Of the 26 Tiger IIs, 19 were still operational. In April 1945 the department retreated to Austria. During the retreat, 12 tigers are destroyed. In May 1945 the department withdrew to Bohemia." So the answer is that when due for re-equipment, the battalions handed over the remaining Tiger Is to other battalion to bring it up to strength and they relocated to Germany to receive the Tiger IIs, for the most part. Source: https://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gliederungen/PanzerAbt/GliederungTiger.htm

The ship is grounded, so not likely to rise much

But this is a war that Israel can win, if it has the will, rather than turning a blind eye to the monster camping next door. Gaza is rally a couple of medium sized cities and this is standard COIN stuff - unrewarding but no novelty.

Pertinent: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2024/may/another-historic-year-pla-navy?mc_cid=bcd656a5c1&mc_eid=cc844f18fe Another Historic Year for the PLA Navy By Captain James E. Fanell, U.S. Navy (Retired) May 2024 Proceedings Vol. 150/5/1,455 For the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the biggest surprise of 2023 was the end-of-year announcement that Admiral Dong Jun, chief of the PLA Navy (PLAN), had been appointed as the 14th Minister of Defense.1 News of Admiral Dong’s appointment was overshadowed in Western media by the mystery surrounding the removal of his predecessor, Army General Li Shangfu. But the first-ever appointment of a career PLAN officer as head of the PLA is a testament to the importance Chairman Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have placed on transforming China into a great naval power to achieve the so-called Great Rejuvenation of China. Toward that end, growth has continued in the number of ships, submarines, and naval aircraft and their operations at sea. An Admiral at the Helm of the PLA The significance of Admiral Dong’s appointment should not be underestimated, as it represents the culmination of 25 years of PLAN modernization and growth—from being a brown-water force to an institution whose top officer is now leading China’s entire military. The appointment is important for two principal reasons. First, Admiral Dong is one of the PLA’s most experienced joint commanders, having deep expertise at the operational level of war in the Eastern and Southern Theater Commands that provides him with unique understanding and perspectives regarding China’s disputed sovereignty claims—cross-domain but fundamentally maritime issues.2 Second, and perhaps more important, Admiral Dong has the distinction of being the first Commander of the East China Sea Joint Operations Command Center (ECS JOCC), having served from July 2013 to November 2014 while he served as one of the deputy commanders of the East Sea Fleet. Established in 2013, the ECS JOCC was the PLA’s first joint operations command headquarters responsible for the operational coordination of the PLAN, PLA Air Force (PLAAF), and other forces—including the China Coast Guard and Strategic Rocket Forces—against Taiwan.3 Admiral Dong’s various appointments should be a reminder of the importance the CCP places on the PLAN and the PLA’s overall capability to take Taiwan by kinetic means should other efforts fail. Growth Continues While recent economic problems have slowed PLAN ship production over the past two years, Chinese reporting indicates the PLAN commissioned its eighth Type 055/Renhai-class cruiser, eight more Type 054A/Jiangkai II frigates, and one comprehensive submarine rescue ship.4 In addition, the PLAN launched one Type 075/Yushen-class amphibious assault ship, five cruisers and destroyers, two newer Type 054B frigates, and three nuclear-powered submarines. The total tonnage launched and commissioned in 2023 was about 170,000 tons, compared with 110,000 tons in 2022, although still somewhat lower than the 200,000-ton annual average prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. While China acknowledged this slight decrease, it claims to have achieved a “significant increase in quality,” particularly with the Type 054B frigates that began sea trials in January 2024.5 Despite producing fewer hulls and less tonnage, the PLAN remains the world’s leader in new commissionings by tonnage—as it has for at least five years. Expected U.S. shipbuilding growth in the coming years probably will not improve this worrying strategic trendline. The Workhorse Shandong While PLAN carrier strike groups (CSGs) today are not of the same caliber as the U.S. Navy’s, a mere 11 years after the first PLANAF fighter recovered on the deck of the Liaoning, China’s second aircraft carrier, the Shandong, was conducting “live-fire confrontation drills” in the South China Sea in January 2023.6 Operations included nighttime launch-and-recoveries as the carrier achieved the first of what would become an unprecedented number of at-sea periods for any PLAN carrier, rivaling days at sea by any U.S. carrier in the western Pacific for the year. In April, the Shandong CSG—which included a Type 055 cruiser, a Type 052D destroyer, two Type 054A frigates, and two comprehensive replenishment ships (a Type 901 and a Type 903)—was back at sea passing through the Bashi Channel and into the waters east of Taiwan. There, it participated in exercise Joint Sword with the PLAAF, PLA Strategic Rocket Forces, and surface combatants that encircled the island of Taiwan from 8 to 10 April.7 Following Joint Sword, the Shandong moved to an area 350 nautical miles west of Guam, close to where the Liaoning had operated just four months prior.8 According to observations by Japan’s Ministry of Defense, during 18 days of operations in the western Pacific, the Shandong conducted 620 aircraft sorties (fixed-wing and helicopter), far exceeding the 320 sorties the Liaoning conducted over 15 days in December 2022.9 Then, in September, the Shandong CSG entered the western Pacific via the Bashi Channel at the same time as a large number of PLAN warships were observed passing through the Miyako Strait into the Philippine Sea. Overall, some 20 PLAN warships were detected, the most ever tracked around Taiwan in a single day.10 A little more than a month later, the Shandong CSG was back at sea in the western Pacific, where it conducted nine days of operations that included 570 aircraft sorties—an average of around 63 aircraft sorties a day. This is nearly twice the number carried out in April and three times the sortie rate recorded by the Liaoning in January.11 Not done, in December the Shandong CSG returned to its homeport in the South China Sea via the Taiwan Strait following a month-long operation in the Bohai Sea, where the Shandong had helped train pilots from the Liaoning while the latter was in port for maintenance.12 While not as rigorous as that of the U.S. Navy’s carrier force, this level of at-sea training is evidence of the PLAN’s rapid growth in capability. The PLAN’s third carrier, the Fujian, completed mooring trials and began dead-load testing of her three electromagnetic catapults in November. She will likely begin sea trials in summer 2024. It seems clear that, while much of the world questions the efficacy of aircraft carriers because of the proliferation of anticarrier missile systems, the PLAN is doubling down on them. Russia and Iran Over the course of 2023, the PLAN continued its long-standing coordinated operations with the Russian Navy. In July, the two navies held joint exercises in the Sea of Japan. For the second year in a row, PLAN and Russian warships conducted a “show of force” when 11 warships transited eastward through the first island chain in August. Ties between Xi and Russia’s Vladimir Putin have grown, and these combined naval operations have expanded, even as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues.13 In addition, the PLAN conducted two trilateral exercises with the Russian and other navies. The first occurred in February, when the PLAN’s 42nd Escort Task Force (ETF) participated in exercise “Mosi II” along with host South Africa’s Navy.14 Then in March, the PLAN’s 43rd ETF conducted the trilateral exercise “Security Belt” with the Russian and Iranian navies. These events are a stark reminder of the alternative international order Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran want to establish in the name of anything but maritime economic security. Preparing for War at Sea The appointment of Admiral Dong to lead China’s Ministry of Defense means that Xi and the CCP have undeniably recognized the importance of maritime power to complete the Great Rejuvenation of China. The CCP has handed over the leadership of the PLA to a man who views the world through the lens of war at sea. Recall that, in December 2022 while still head of the navy, Dong held a conclave of senior PLAN officers. The gathering could be reduced to a single, critically important theme: “Make all necessary preparations to defeat the U.S. Navy in great power war at sea.”15 Admiral Dong’s appointment will affect the entire PLA in the next year and throughout the remainder of this so-called decade of concern. 1. CDR Mike Dahm, USN (Ret.), “Who’s Hu, the New PLAN Commander,” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings 149, no. 12 (29 December 2023). 2. Andrew S. Erickson and CAPT Christopher Sharman, USN (Ret.), “Admiral Dong Jun Engages Friends and Foes: China’s First Naval Defense Minister Brings Joint Operational Experience,” China Maritime Studies Institute, 30 December 2023, 1. 3. Erickson and Sharman, “Admiral Dong Jun Engages Friends and Foes,” 2. 4. Tan Yusheng, “2023 Review of the Chinese Navy’s Equipment Development in 2023 [Original in Chinese],” Naval and Merchant Ships no. 2 (2024): 66–75. 5. Yusheng, “2023 Review of the Chinese Navy’s Equipment.” 6. “Highlights of Aircraft Carrier Shandong’s Live-Fire Drill in South China Sea,” PLA Daily, 16 January 2023. 7. Liu Xuanzun, “China’s Aircraft Carrier Shandong Holds Intensive Drills Comparable with Liaoning in West Pacific,” Global Times, 18 April 2023. 8. “Chinese Aircraft Carrier Nears U.S. Territory of Guam,” Radio Free Asia, 30 December 2022. 9. Liu Xuanzun, “China’s Shandong Aircraft Carrier Group Collaborates with Rocket Force, Land-Based Aviation Forces in 1st Far Sea Exercise,” Global Times, 7 May 2023. 10. Keoni Everington, “Chart Shows Chinese ‘Unprecedented’ Carrier Exercises around Taiwan,” Taiwan News, 18 September 2023. 11. Liu Xuanzun, “PLA’s Carrier Shandong Doubles Aircraft Sortie Rate Record in Latest Far Sea Drill,” Global Times, 7 November 2023. 12. Liu Xuanzun, “PLA’s Aircraft Carrier Shandong Transits Taiwan Straits after Operation in the North,” Global Times, 12 December 2023. 13. John Feng, “Map Shows Chinese Navy Ships Heading for Possible Russia Meet,” Newsweek, 19 March 2024. 14. Jay Gates, “Arrival of Chinese Navy Taskforce in Cape Town a Sign of Closer China/SA Ties,” Defence Web, 31 July 2023. 15. Ryan D. Martinson, “Winning High-End War at Sea: Insights into the PLA Navy’s New Strategic Concept,” Center for International Maritime Security, 18 May 2023

This is one of those "this is the manual vs this is how things are done". Peacetime army, soldier loses a piece of kit = Major flap!, wartime = let's write off this tank so we can use it for spares. As mentioned, there are plenty of "field modifications" going on but writing off a tank to make a cargo carrier is significant stuff that won't go unnoticed. As Roman said, the Russians seem particular asses on this stuff, but back in the day, when I served, there were no qualms about cannibalizing stuff to get a fully operational vehicle... in peacetime.

Now, that's a good question... we will never know how that was written in LICspeak

Sport! then you better stay off them conre durgs, if you know ur breech from ur mussel! Once you hear that, you know you are in the correct library.

A great opportunity was missed by not having this signing at the Kitsap Regional library, it would be the culmination of all Tanknetinesh...

As you may already know, there are 2 military museums that are worth the visit (and free), plus the Parajola battery, which doesn't have any guns but it's worth just for the view: https://www.xn--castillosdeespaa-lub.es/es/content/parajola-bateria-de-la https://bateriascostacartagena.blogspot.com/2016/04/la-parajola-c-3.html