Red Ant

Removing a ship that would help Russia control the sea does not help Ukraine? How do you figure that? Less threat of amphibious assaults; one less SAM / RADAR platform to worry about; more casualties / losses to Russia in general == diminishing the capabilities of Russia to continue the war.

@sundayDid you have a point with any of that?

Never mind, apparently it wasn't you but one of the other resident Kremlin stooges (here is the post in which I quoted thr relevant comment):

Odd, I could swear just a few months ago I quoted you on a comment where you said something along the lines of a large share of the instigators of this "civil war" being Jewish. Maybe I should dig that post up again ...

Many? Hmm, from everything I've seen it doesn't really seem that way. I'm sure there are a few among them that actually believe in Russia's cause, but most of them seem like they'd rather be anywhere else than the front lines.

Quite a few aspects of the Energiewende may very well have been badly mishandled, but I hope it's at least agreed that switch to renewables is necessary, given the increasingly bleak climate change prognosis.

Scroll down a bit where it says that it's just a meme.

Who the fuck are YOU to accuse anyone of such things when YOUR ilk are openly cheering for genocide of civilians? And yes, this is genocide because remember "it's not a war", so they can't just be written off as collateral damage of a war.

And why would that be?

It seems that, as far as some people on here are concerned, a poster could openly be advocating genocide as long as their tone is "civil".

🤣It's amazing how long you can keep this up.

I don't know. IMO the idea of fixing Afghanistan from the outside was always a dumb idea. It is inherently impossible as long as Afghans continue to be Afghans (which they probably will do for a good while longer).

Good lord, that amount of self-hate must be crippling.

Yes, the price you pay for having a spine, but you wouldn't know ...

She's right, though. People who want to appease / surrender to naked aggression because standing up to it would be politically / economically inconvenient can go F themselves. Hard.

Tank to tank combat in indirect fire mode? Is that a thing? 🤔

Is there even a place where you could get unobstructed line of sight on a target over 10 km?

Could also be the Russians trying to lure more forces into a trap and then cutting them off and destroying them. Just throwing that out there; no idea what is really happening.

Ok, so you seriously believe the world will be a better place if we all just look the other way when a major military power in Europe just straight up gobbles up smaller neighbors? I mean what the hell is wrong with you?

Would they, though? By its own claims, Russia is not at war, and sharing info on the whereabouts of assets belonging to a nation that is at peace with everyone is not illegal, is it?

Where are you getting that?

I honestly don't get this dismissive attitude towards Biden's cognitive abilities that seems to be so popular in conservative circles. He has a mild speech impediment and isn't as quick as he used to be, but on what grounds do people accuse him of being any more dense than most other U.S. presidents, PARTICULARLY when the previous POTUS was Trump?

I'm currently a hater of Russian invaders and those shilling for them. But only those supporting the aggressors can answer how many Russian lives you're willing to piss away for your imperial power games.

The ratio is set by the invader, not the defender, and since you made it pretty clear that you fully support the invader, maybe you can answer your own question. 🤔

But what about ....? Do you guys EVER have a response that doesn't come down to classic whataboutism?