Solid_Snake Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 The 170 mm gun on type 59 chasis is denominated KOKSAN, belivied to be a development of a soviet naval gun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabe Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/wor.../m-1978-170.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakec Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Velly interesting! Look at the bottom left picture on the page. Seems the whole armour block lifts right out of the turret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakec Posted May 22, 2006 Share Posted May 22, 2006 Type-96/ZTZ-88C modified with add-on armour.   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakec Posted May 22, 2006 Share Posted May 22, 2006 Clearer version of the Type-99 book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Warford Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 Jakec; great pics...thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Warford Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 As I've mentioned before here on the forum...originally, I thought that the Type 98 and ZTZ-99's turret armor module's small compartment was used to house composite material...it even resembles the holes in BDD turret boxes. Maybe the Chinese were using polyurethane and steel plates like the Russians had with BDD? More recently however, I've come to the conclusion that the compartment really has nothing to do with the module's composite array...at least not directly. In my opinion (and the pic below seems to support this theory), the compartment is actually used to provide access to the mounting hardware that attaches the armor module to the turret. Clearly the modules are made (like the Israeli modules they are derived from), to be quickly removed if damaged or if they need to be upgraded. Where else could they be attached, where the crew could remove them? The Type 96 uses a series of clearly visible external bolts to mount the composite armor modules to the turret...these bolts are not used on the Type 98 or ZTZ-99. I can imagine the crew storing the wrench and lugs necessary to remove the modules in the same compartment...for safe-keeping. The crew would simply remove the compartment cover, loosen the mounting bolts, and lift the complete module/pack by using the three lifting "eyes" and the boom from a near-by recovery vehicle. Hmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdoktar Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 It´s the finns. I´ve done it twice with a T-55, with all web gear. Seems to me that they´ve left the web gear behind. I´m not that big myself, and even i felt some pressure under the T-55. Some bigger guys sometimes got caught in the bolts or cracks or whatever protruding objects of the tank and got dragged on for metres, before the tank stopped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakec Posted May 29, 2006 Share Posted May 29, 2006 Seems to be the month for upgraded PLA tanks. Type-62 light tank with what looks like ERA.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Warford Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 ...ZTZ-99 auto-loader:Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRYTRY Posted June 13, 2006 Share Posted June 13, 2006 (edited) ZTZ-99G is not in service.The pictures called ZTZ-99G all are ZTZ-99. Edited June 13, 2006 by TRYTRY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djuice Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavalier Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Interesting picture. They are changing the barrel, but they crew is wearing the combat gear and the spare barrel is not visible. It seems to me that they are only showing the procedure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 How long is the Chinese 125mm barrel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solid_Snake Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 A chinese indigenour gun based in the 2A46M, probaly L55. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pikachu Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Um, it's not THAT long. The "barrel" on the pic is either the thermal sleeve being removed or there are two barrels superimposed, one farther forward but behind the tank's own barrel. The spare barrel, perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesG123 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 It IS that long. They have most of the barrel pulled out of the trunion/recoil assembly (all that silver part). On any modern tank a good 1/4th to 1/3rd of the tube is buried within the tank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Przezdzieblo Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Um, it's not THAT long. Â The "barrel" on the pic is either the thermal sleeve being removed or there are two barrels superimposed, one farther forward but behind the tank's own barrel. The spare barrel, perhaps?391818[/snapback]Â Yes, it is.Just a little comparison with Obj. 219A (so T-80 silhuette):http://img469.imageshack.us/img469/6271/ztz99ob219axk0.jpgThanks to ImageShack for Free Image Hosting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MassPwnage Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Not proportioned correctly. The Type 99 has a longer hull and turret than the Russian Ts. The gun is longer than the Russian 2A46M though. It COULD be an L-55 for all I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Not proportioned correctly. The Type 99 has a longer hull and turret than the Russian Ts.391893[/snapback]Â In the picture he posted the gun mantlets are lined up, so proportionality is not an issue. Â ~~~~Â In any case, according to Sino Defense the hull of the Type 99 is 1m longer than that of the T-72, while Wikipedia says that the entire length of the tank, gun foward (I assume) is 11m. That's about 3.1m of overhang. In a bad measurement with a ruler and using the image you uploaded I guessed that gun length to the front of the hull is ~4.8m That's a total length of 7.9m for the gun. All these measurements are, of course, extremely off, but assuming it is lower the length of a 125mm L/55 would be 6.875m, so L/55 sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavalier Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 (edited) Part of the thermal sleeve has been removed. It can be observed on the right of the fume evacuator. For using the crane and sling without damaging the thermal sleeve, this part has to be removed. If yoo look carefully (the barrel is also painted) you can observe it.  Observe also the tronconic shape on the left of the silver part. I think that the barrel is close to be completely removed and the barrel can be observed almost enterely. Observe this picture of the same operation (silver part and center of gravity): This picture supports my opinion. Edited November 13, 2006 by Cavalier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harkonnen Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Not proportioned correctly. The Type 99 has a longer hull and turret than the Russian Ts. The gun is longer than the Russian 2A46M though. It COULD be an L-55 for all I know.391893[/snapback]Â Â Hull - yes. turret - No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakec Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 125mm in ZTZ-98 is 50 calibres, at least according to Wang Hui (and he got his magazine banned for printing the article so I'm inclined to give his claims the benefit of the doubt). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bojan Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 125mm in ZTZ-98 is 50 calibres...392788[/snapback]Â That would give it same length as a 2A46 family - it is claimed to be L49, L50 or L52 depending how you measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m4a1 Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 Few soruces I've heard of say that new Chinese APFSDS, fired from the gun of ztz-98, have the ability to penetrate 800-900 mm of RHA. Can you confirm or deny it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now