sunday Posted January 25 Posted January 25 It requires capability to 3D print metal in some form, yes, but represents quite an advance over the need of precisely machine the shaped charge cone, it seems.
bojan Posted January 25 Posted January 25 For such low precision charges there is no need for complicated machining, and simple stamping works, like Germans did in WW2 with PzF steel liner.
sunday Posted January 25 Author Posted January 25 1 hour ago, bojan said: For such low precision charges there is no need for complicated machining, and simple stamping works, like Germans did in WW2 with PzF steel liner. Ok, thanks. I wonder if a metal 3D printer could be more affordable/easy to install and operate than a stamping press.
Markus Becker Posted January 25 Posted January 25 4 hours ago, sunday said: Ok, thanks. I wonder if a metal 3D printer could be more affordable/easy to install and operate than a stamping press. By being absolutely more flexible than a press.
Markus Becker Posted January 25 Posted January 25 5 hours ago, bojan said: For such low precision charges there is no need for complicated machining, and simple stamping works, like Germans did in WW2 with PzF steel liner. Wait..a...second! Didn't you say that really good HEAT ammo wasn't possible until they got input for nuclear weapons programs? Or is the HEAT in the video the budget stuff?
sunday Posted January 25 Author Posted January 25 1 hour ago, Markus Becker said: Or is the HEAT in the video the budget stuff? This seems to be the correct assumption.
Olof Larsson Posted January 25 Posted January 25 7 hours ago, sunday said: Ok, thanks. I wonder if a metal 3D printer could be more affordable/easy to install and operate than a stamping press. A 3D printer would be easier to install, but stamping (or more reasonably forging) would be far less expensive, and at least a couple of orders of magnitude faster. As I was tought at a metal 3D-printing class. 3D-printing is great...if you want to make one or very few parts, or if the geometry means you have no other option.
bojan Posted January 26 Posted January 26 5 hours ago, Markus Becker said: Wait..a...second! Didn't you say that really good HEAT ammo wasn't possible until they got input for nuclear weapons programs? Research was published long time ago, so nowadays (well, since the early '80s) non-nuclear countries also produce good shaped charges. Quote Or is the HEAT in the video the budget stuff? Very non-precision.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now