shootER5 Posted September 2, 2004 Share Posted September 2, 2004 I need to make the switch to digital at some point, but haven't really made it a priority. My wife has a Nikon N6006 that's the "point and shoot" camera in the house. If I'm taking a serious photo, I use the Pentax K-1000 that I've had for nearly twenty years. In that time I've had a Pentax ME (or MX, I forget which) and a Canon A-1, which I used when I was a newspaper photographer. I sold the Canon when I got into teevee and the ME/MX took too many tumbles from the TC position onto the turret floor and wouldn't make an in-focus photograph any more. The K-1000 is still going strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 K-1000 like the Minolta X-700 I have is a good no frills camera that allows you to really do your best work. Originally posted by shootER5:I need to make the switch to digital at some point, but haven't really made it a priority. My wife has a Nikon N6006 that's the "point and shoot" camera in the house. If I'm taking a serious photo, I use the Pentax K-1000 that I've had for nearly twenty years. In that time I've had a Pentax ME (or MX, I forget which) and a Canon A-1, which I used when I was a newspaper photographer. I sold the Canon when I got into teevee and the ME/MX took too many tumbles from the TC position onto the turret floor and wouldn't make an in-focus photograph any more. The K-1000 is still going strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sikkiyn Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 I use a Fuji S5000 digital myself, and even though it is not supposed to be an SLR type, I have found with the adapter, that I can add extra lenses should the need arise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whyhow Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 Murph, which TLR do you use? I just got myself an old Ricohflex. I haven't run a roll through it yet but I already like the suprisingly small camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whyhow Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 have you try to use the K-1000 lens on the ME/MX? the tumbles probably only damage the lens. what else could cause a manual SLR to produce out of focus pictures? Originally posted by shootER5:I need to make the switch to digital at some point, but haven't really made it a priority. My wife has a Nikon N6006 that's the "point and shoot" camera in the house. If I'm taking a serious photo, I use the Pentax K-1000 that I've had for nearly twenty years. In that time I've had a Pentax ME (or MX, I forget which) and a Canon A-1, which I used when I was a newspaper photographer. I sold the Canon when I got into teevee and the ME/MX took too many tumbles from the TC position onto the turret floor and wouldn't make an in-focus photograph any more. The K-1000 is still going strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootER5 Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by whyhow:have you try to use the K-1000 lens on the ME/MX? the tumbles probably only damage the lens. what else could cause a manual SLR to produce out of focus pictures? I'm pretty sure that the film plane got out of alignment on the ME/MX because the same lenses still take superb photos with the K-1000. I used the ME/MX more often when I was in the military because the body was smaller than the K-1000 and fit better in the cargo pocket of my BDUs. [Edited by shootER5 (04 Sep 2004).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootER5 Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 Bah, double post. [Edited by shootER5 (04 Sep 2004).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 4, 2004 Share Posted September 4, 2004 And old Yashica D. I learned on a camera just like it. Originally posted by whyhow:Murph, which TLR do you use? I just got myself an old Ricohflex. I haven't run a roll through it yet but I already like the suprisingly small camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Sosa Posted September 8, 2004 Share Posted September 8, 2004 Well, I am the proud owner of a Canon 300D Digital Rebel since yesterday. Haven't had much of a chance to play with it so far, but I am loving it. It comes with the kit 18-55mm zoom lens, which I hear is OK for the price. After I learn more about the camera and photography in general I'll be in a beter position to determine what type of lens I really need. Any other Drebel owners? What do you think about it so far? Regards,Juan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 8, 2004 Share Posted September 8, 2004 I find I use the short to medium (85mm to 200mm) telephotos more than the wide angles. My favorite lens is my 28-85mm I do 85% of my work with it on my 35mm. USed the old 35mm this weekend. Originally posted by Juan Sosa:Well, I am the proud owner of a Canon 300D Digital Rebel since yesterday. Haven't had much of a chance to play with it so far, but I am loving it. It comes with the kit 18-55mm zoom lens, which I hear is OK for the price. After I learn more about the camera and photography in general I'll be in a beter position to determine what type of lens I really need. Any other Drebel owners? What do you think about it so far? Regards,Juan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Kibbey Posted September 8, 2004 Share Posted September 8, 2004 >98% of the 300-400 pictures I took in Vietnam I took with this. Bought in the Phu Bai or Camp Eagle PX for maybe $130. Still takes great pics...though it's one of the first to offer aperture priority automatic operation if one wants. Every picture I took there was with a normal lens and no filters whatsoever. I didn't buy lenses for this one, as the hexanon mount was non-standard and you couldn't use aftermarket lenses.Years later I bought a Minolta for my long lens aviation shots. Having done chemical for decades, and resisting digital until my wife talked me into an inexpensive Olympus last year, I can say that digital is definitely what's happening and I look forward to getting another one. But this one is like your first sweetheart..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 9, 2004 Share Posted September 9, 2004 YES! My first 35mm camera was a Konica T3! Loved that camera till it got stolen on my move back from Germany. Originally posted by Doug Kibbey:>98% of the 300-400 pictures I took in Vietnam I took with this. Bought in the Phu Bai or Camp Eagle PX for maybe $130. Still takes great pics...though it's one of the first to offer aperture priority automatic operation if one wants. Every picture I took there was with a normal lens and no filters whatsoever. I didn't buy lenses for this one, as the hexanon mount was non-standard and you couldn't use aftermarket lenses.Years later I bought a Minolta for my long lens aviation shots. [/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Anyone have an opinion on whether its better to stay at 4.0 megapixels or go to 5.0 megapixels? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Originally posted by Murph:Anyone have an opinion on whether its better to stay at 4.0 megapixels or go to 5.0 megapixels? That's not a quantum leap, resolutionwise, so I'd look at the other factors pertinent to my style of use. Give me a wider range of ISO equivalents, a decently fast shutter, fast bootup time, SLR focusing, and lens choices. Juan, how's the Drebel working out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Sosa Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 The dRebel is working out great. The kit lens is decent enough, but I already placed an order for some new glass. Bought a Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM, which from all the reviews sounds like a greap general purpose lens for the price. Next buy is a tripod so I can take some decent nighttime pictures. There are some great shots to be had of the Miami skyline from a couple spots I’ve scouted out already. I’d also like a circular polarizing filter. Once I am more comfortable with the camera (BTW I find the switchology very straight forward) I will probably install the firmware hack to it. Once I do I’ll essentially have a 10D on a rebel body. I have yet to read about anyone having trouble with the hack, so I figure it is safe enough. The only downside to this whole photography deal is that I have yet another interest to spend money in. Regards,Juan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted September 23, 2004 Share Posted September 23, 2004 Originally posted by Juan Sosa:The only downside to this whole photography deal is that I have yet another interest to spend money in. Just keep telling yourself that you're saving a fortune on film processing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickard N Posted September 24, 2004 Share Posted September 24, 2004 I'm using a Nikon FM2 with fixed optics. Nice camera, stopped using my automatic Minolta almost as soon as I bought this one. Now I'm looking to change to a F90X, F100 or a D70/D100, but there's the thing about money... /Rickard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 24, 2004 Share Posted September 24, 2004 Did some photography with my Minolta X-700 a couple of weeks ago, and discovered I am very rusty. Need to get back into the swing of things. I want that Kodak 5.0 megapixel digital. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 Yeah the Kodak 5.0 camera has a 10x optical lens. I can use that more than the 3x on my current 4.0 mp digital. Originally posted by Ivanhoe:That's not a quantum leap, resolutionwise, so I'd look at the other factors pertinent to my style of use. Give me a wider range of ISO equivalents, a decently fast shutter, fast bootup time, SLR focusing, and lens choices. Juan, how's the Drebel working out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul F Jungnitsch Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 As a grad student, digital is the most wonderful thing. I can take millions of project photos without any cost and organize them all nicely on the computer. Last weekend I put mine up on a kite and took some aerial photos of my project site, worked very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Nelson Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 Originally posted by Juan Sosa:The dRebel is working out great. The kit lens is decent enough, but I already placed an order for some new glass. Bought a Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM, which from all the reviews sounds like a greap general purpose lens for the price. I'm enjoying my Canon Digital Rebel as well. And I'm noticing a lot of them about. Took my first shots at a ship launching at Mystic Seaport, which is at the end of my street, and the person on either side of me had one! I bought the 28-200mm lens and have gotten great use out of it. The big drawback is that it lacks image stabilization (a rotating glass lens that acts as a gyroscope to remove the minute vibrations from your hand) so you need to use a high shutter speed to ensure a sharp focus. A 6.3 megapixel digital SLR plus a good zoom lens let me take this photo, among many others, at the New England Airshow just last month: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stargrunt6 Posted September 29, 2004 Author Share Posted September 29, 2004 BTT in order to post links to my photo album. Here are a few pics I did. My rig is a Canon T70, and I used 200 speed Kodak High Definition film in Auto Exposure mode with light metering: http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/wargoat6/alb...goat6/my_photos I'm happy with these. Great balance and resolution, no editing needed. And here are rugby pics, taken with 400 speed Fuji Film. Shutter speed was at 1/1000 sec in Shutter priority mode (IOW, I dunno the f stop): http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/wargoat6/album?.dir=953f Did some editing on all photos. Poor quality on a lot of them, either due to bad scans or the fact that some of them were taken from afar and I lost quality on zooming in. How's that for a rookie? Peace, Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Anyone have any experience with the new 8 mp Nikons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Murph Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Well just got my DX7590 5.0 mp camera (Kodak), its charging as I type. I also got a 512 mb SD card to go with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Nelson Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Gee, you don't want to provide us lazy types with even a link, huh?Sometimes I feel like a gotta do everything....Kodak EasyShare DX7590 5MP Digital Camera Hmmm, I like the 10x optical zoom. Looks like a nice camera. Any immediate plans? You'll have to post some of your photos on Imageshack so we can see how it performs. Just be careful with the 512MB card-- I went to an airshow with Jeff and ended up taking 243 photos before I knew it! Westover AFB, Massachusetts, August 14, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now