17thfabn Posted November 10, 2024 Posted November 10, 2024 6 hours ago, sunday said: There is no paywall for this https://www.newsweek.com/i-worked-democrats-years-billionaires-have-unfettered-influence-opinion-1961471 Are the Ds the party of oligarchs now? I'd imagine the big donors on both sides have an all access pass to politicians on their side. I heard a comedian years ago, can't remember which one, say politicians should be required to wear markings on their clothing the way race cars have tags from their sponsors.
NickM Posted November 10, 2024 Posted November 10, 2024 14 hours ago, sunday said: I am banned from X since long time ago. not just that! why can't we just read the damned message without having to be a member.
Tim Sielbeck Posted November 11, 2024 Posted November 11, 2024 5 hours ago, NickM said: not just that! why can't we just read the damned message without having to be a member. I’m not a member and I can still read most of the messages posted here.
NickM Posted November 11, 2024 Posted November 11, 2024 Just now, Tim Sielbeck said: I’m not a member and I can still read most of the messages posted here. How? I click on the darned thing and I'm transported over to X and given the option to log in.
Tim Sielbeck Posted November 11, 2024 Posted November 11, 2024 This is usually what I see. Sometimes there is only the stuff on the right. Sometimes I can close it and read the post other times not.
JWB Posted November 13, 2024 Posted November 13, 2024 Kamala Harris gave $500,000 to MSNBC anchor's nonprofit before network's fawning interview. https://x.com/MailOnline/status/1856479778829898180
Ivanhoe Posted November 13, 2024 Posted November 13, 2024 On 11/10/2024 at 11:56 PM, Tim Sielbeck said: This is usually what I see. Sometimes there is only the stuff on the right. Sometimes I can close it and read the post other times not. X and many other sites (looking at you, Google) seem to be infected with the Indecisive Squirrel Syndrome. They can't seem to develop a decent UX and then just run it, they've got to keep effing with it so that the UX changes weekly.
NickM Posted November 13, 2024 Posted November 13, 2024 On 11/11/2024 at 12:56 AM, Tim Sielbeck said: This is usually what I see. Sometimes there is only the stuff on the right. Sometimes I can close it and read the post other times not. Same here. Exactly the stuff I DON'T Wanna see.
rmgill Posted November 13, 2024 Author Posted November 13, 2024 3 hours ago, Ivanhoe said: X and many other sites (looking at you, Google) seem to be infected with the Indecisive Squirrel Syndrome. They can't seem to develop a decent UX and then just run it, they've got to keep effing with it so that the UX changes weekly. It's an artifact of Dev Ops. You hire some interface folks and then they're going to do re-freshes on a routine basis. At CNN.com they had a rolling project to re-fresh the home page. Basically several senior artists and devs were constantly employed rolling through each of the sites to upgrade them. What was funny was when they upgraded the CNN.Espaniol page. The site design was NOT well received by the viewers. The designers were an Icelandic man and a Japanese woman. Needless to say the color pallettes chosen were culturally appropriate for Japanese and Icelanders. CNN's home page circa 2000. I'm still looking to see if I can find the abortive espanol page redesign.
rmgill Posted November 13, 2024 Author Posted November 13, 2024 (edited) Ahh this was the early page. https://web.archive.org/web/20010331064355/http://www.cnnespanol.com/ 2005 2006 2007 2009 - This was the later design. I think the abortive design was some where earlier in 2009 or 2008... Edited November 13, 2024 by rmgill
rmgill Posted November 13, 2024 Author Posted November 13, 2024 I miss the early homepage formats. It was far more clean and simple. Fewer web elements. Now it's FULL of stuff. And don't get me started with the ad sourcing that is entirely mercenary but still affects the news editorial side.
lucklucky Posted November 14, 2024 Posted November 14, 2024 https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/11/12/behind_the_scenes_french_man_witnesses_kamala_harris_fashion_week_party_september_2024.html
Tim the Tank Nut Posted November 15, 2024 Posted November 15, 2024 so the Harris campaign was shorter than most Presidential campaigns because of her "appointment". After Harris got the position of candidate she was showered by all manner of wealth and riches for her campaign. Now, it is all said and done and the unusually short campaign ended deep in the red with reports of massive payouts for celebrity endorsements and huge expenditures for campaign props. Given the ability of Harris to make a complete wreck of the campaign I think it is safe to safe we dodged a bullet in this election. Factually Harris was unable to manage a campaign and the United States is a much larger thing to have to manage.
rmgill Posted November 15, 2024 Author Posted November 15, 2024 The Dark Horse podcast has an extensive deep dive into that campaign funding problem set. Another aspect was that donations by regular people were matched at an 8x rate by big donors. Why the match by the big donors. Strange thing all of that.
Sinistar Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 very few people can actually name what kamala actually campaigned for. she was either deliberately opaque about her motives or she had none at all and was more of a vapid opportunist- politicians have long known the game not to come out and say what they really think or else they might get hung with their own words later. behave one way but hedge another when making public statements or stumping on the campaign trail but usually there is at least something to go on for a sense of continuity hillary clinton was a similar type of slippery animal- you can find videos of her prior to her presidential run in 2016 where she openly stated she was a against homosexual marriage, when bill clinton was president, his administration signed DOMA into law. so that at least a kind of contiguous logic as to where she was coming from. then during 2016 when confronted with her own past statements she acts like that never happened in the end kamala is unburdened by what has been. or something
Rick Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 Some of the details of her campaigns dept is semi-unbelievable. https://news.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-raised-1-billion-160956903.html
Rick Posted November 20, 2024 Posted November 20, 2024 And the Democrat Party wonders why they cannot win the blue-collar worker. https://news.yahoo.com/news/union-calls-democratic-party-staff-195646111.html
Murph Posted November 21, 2024 Posted November 21, 2024 Most Democrats want the former high price call girl to run again. https://puck.news/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/November-2024-Voter-Omnibus-PUCK-Topline.pdf
Stargrunt6 Posted November 27, 2024 Posted November 27, 2024 In the medical field, we call this "sh*t-hammered commode-hugging drunk" https://twitter.com/Aristos_Revenge/status/1861621035042275802
Stargrunt6 Posted November 27, 2024 Posted November 27, 2024 And they tried to stop her https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1861622277042819128
Ivanhoe Posted November 27, 2024 Posted November 27, 2024 I know its a character flaw of mine, but I'm going to LMAO when some video from Diddyville shows her high as a kite and making out with actresses or teenagers.
Ivanhoe Posted November 27, 2024 Posted November 27, 2024 https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2024/11/26/dnc-staffers-beg-for-cash-after-kamala-shellacking-n2648263 Quote "Last week, 2/3 of DNC staff was laid off with little notice and no severance. We are heartbroken to see our colleagues—who dedicated countless hours to electing Democrats up and down the ballot—depart under these circumstances, and we are furious with DNC leadership for failing to provide severance to those affected. As such, we are creating a relief fund which will directly aid staff members, including single parents and workers expecting children, impacted by the recent layoffs. The funds raised will be distributed equally to any laid-off member who opts in to receive funds. We hope these funds can soften the economic blow for those impacted," a statement on the page states. https://freebeacon.com/elections/these-four-democratic-firms-raked-in-600-million-running-ads-for-kamalas-failed-campaign/ Not surprisingly, the Harris campaign very deftly demonstrated the 3rd world kleptocratic value system that drives the DNC.
NickM Posted November 27, 2024 Posted November 27, 2024 9 hours ago, Stargrunt6 said: In the medical field, we call this "sh*t-hammered commode-hugging drunk" https://twitter.com/Aristos_Revenge/status/1861621035042275802 You forgot to include "knee walking".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now