Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 915
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Wow the Kamala Krash on the market is here.  Down just under 1100 points in one day.  Well that is what happens when you have a bunch of communists in control.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Murph said:

Wow the Kamala Krash on the market is here.  Down just under 1100 points in one day.  Well that is what happens when you have a bunch of communists in control.  

The current insanity in currencies, stocks, bonds, commodities has roots going way back.

Of course, the dude/dudette at the wheel when the iceberg rips a gouge in the hull gets blamed. Take the job, take the blame.

Part of the instability is due to market players being very cynical about the Fed and the MMT (Moronic Monetary Theory) folks running things. Also major cynicism about the politicking by the Dept of Labor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's generally weak growth, as the results of the decarbonization follies are becoming harder and harder to ignore, that made the whole stock market situation unstable. Next, much of the global stock market growth is driven by a handful of tech giants. All that's needed is a slight disturbance of a precarious equilibrium; we may have just experienced peak AI hype, and as much of the tech giants' share price inflation was tied to that, well, a notable course correction results. Not sure if it qualifies as a crash (yet).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also would like to know what her policy positions are.  And she picked probably the most Liberal/Communist Governor in the US today, the douchenozzle walsh.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rmgill said:

So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us? 

i was going to ask the other day...

if you support Kamala, what has she done as VP that you support and what has she done prior to becoming VP that you support?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rmgill said:

Her platform is "she's not Trump". 

 

And that this even works, does not speak to well for Trump either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it speaks poorly of the DNC electorate who are fixated on mean tweets and the fact that Trump is a bit of an Ass. The vast bulk of the hardcore liberals I know who are anything but big on polite norms and decorum are the ones who were MOST upset. These are people who are quite brash and vocal and not the normal mode of quiet politeness. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rmgill said:

So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us? 

I think everybody knows that Kamala's primary position is kneeling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the DNC does not force Trump to behave like an ass or post mean tweets. So either those are also gaining favour with his electorate or it would be very stupid to energize the other party without need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://uncoverdc.com/2024/08/04/fams-whistleblowers-report-tulsi-gabbard-on-quiet-skies-list

Quote

In an exclusive breaking story, several Federal Air Marshal whistleblowers have come forward with information showing that former U.S. Representative and Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is currently enrolled in the Quiet Skies program. Quiet Skies is a TSA surveillance program with its own compartmentalized suspected terrorist watchlist. It is the same program being weaponized against J6 defendants and their families. Quiet Skies is allegedly used to protect traveling Americans from suspected domestic terrorists. The photo below is a screenshot from the actual Target Package used by the FAMS to surveil Gabbard. 

.

Quote

The whistleblowers first shared the information with Sonya LaBosco, the Executive Director of the Air Marshal National Council (AMNC), a national advocacy group for the Federal Air Marshals (FAMs). According to LaBosco, at least one of the whistleblowers is ready to go on the record with pertinent documentation. LaBosco shared that Gabbard is unaware she has two Explosive Detection Canine Teams, one Transportation Security Specialist (explosives), one plainclothes TSA Supervisor, and three Federal Air Marshalls on every flight she boards. LaBosco has attempted to contact Gabbard and her staff but has not received a response.

.

Quote

According to LaBosco, Gabbard’s enrollment in Quiet Skies is likely politically motivated. Air Marshals were first assigned to Gabbard on Jul. 23, a day after she criticized Kamala Harris, Biden, and the National Security State in an interview with Laura Ingraham. FAMs were mobilized on Jul. 24 and assigned to their first flight with her on Jul. 25. Gabbard posted the interview on Twitter, as shared below.  

The Dems and their Deep State flying monkey squadron are not psychologically well.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When all this "anti terrorism" bureaucracy was being put in place post 9/11, people warned that they would turn it all against domestic enemies of the state. Many, including myself, poo pooed it, dismissing their warnings. Well they were right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, seahawk said:

But the DNC does not force Trump to behave like an ass or post mean tweets. So either those are also gaining favour with his electorate or it would be very stupid to energize the other party without need.

No, but they condone their own being asses in their own way, or making nice sounds while they screw people in interviews. So, yes, you're going to get people who will be asses back to the Delores Umbridges of the world. 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Mr King said:

When all this "anti terrorism" bureaucracy was being put in place post 9/11, people warned that they would turn it all against domestic enemies of the state. Many, including myself, poo pooed it, dismissing their warnings. Well they were right.

I had arguments with friends who strongly stated that no one in the federal government would ever release the sensitive information they'd hoovered up in the normal course of their operations, there'd be hell to pay and folks would lose jobs, pensions, see charges. 

What have we seen from the IRS releasing personal information? Nothing. That doesn't even touch on the stuff the FBI gathers with the help of the other alphabet agencies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rmgill said:

No, it speaks poorly of the DNC electorate who are fixated on mean tweets and the fact that Trump is a bit of an Ass. The vast bulk of the hardcore liberals I know who are anything but big on polite norms and decorum are the ones who were MOST upset. These are people who are quite brash and vocal and not the normal mode of quiet politeness. 

 

There clearly are a lot of independents intending to vote for both candidates if the polls are to be believed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, seahawk said:

But the DNC does not force Trump to behave like an ass or post mean tweets. So either those are also gaining favour with his electorate or it would be very stupid to energize the other party without need.

Moreover the DNC does not force Trump to fight his own party in GA or have disastrous interviews in hostile venues.

But in any case “not Trump” is enough for me. If the GOP had put Haley in maybe I would do more serious research, but if the Republican nominee is the Jan 6th riot instigator who tried to have Pence nullify the last election, then policy barely matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Josh said:

By who?

Good question. 

Where is her policies page? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ivanhoe said:

https://uncoverdc.com/2024/08/04/fams-whistleblowers-report-tulsi-gabbard-on-quiet-skies-list

.

.

The Dems and their Deep State flying monkey squadron are not psychologically well.

I want to fly on the flights Tulsi Gabbard is on. They would be ultra safe with all the security!

The down side would be my wife smacking me in the head every time Tulsi walks by and I almost get whiplash.

image.jpeg.f87208c85ef0ffc2eafb81fa388467b1.jpeg

 

Edited by 17thfabn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...