Stargrunt6 Posted August 5, 2024 Posted August 5, 2024 (edited) I know notheeng Edited August 5, 2024 by Stargrunt6
Ivanhoe Posted August 5, 2024 Posted August 5, 2024 https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/08/03/josh-shapiro-doesnt-want-you-to-know-this-about-himself-n4931311 The media is memory-holing Shapiro's IDF escapades, and I suppose at some point, they'll be whitewashing his ancestry.
Murph Posted August 5, 2024 Posted August 5, 2024 Wow the Kamala Krash on the market is here. Down just under 1100 points in one day. Well that is what happens when you have a bunch of communists in control.
Ivanhoe Posted August 5, 2024 Posted August 5, 2024 2 hours ago, Murph said: Wow the Kamala Krash on the market is here. Down just under 1100 points in one day. Well that is what happens when you have a bunch of communists in control. The current insanity in currencies, stocks, bonds, commodities has roots going way back. Of course, the dude/dudette at the wheel when the iceberg rips a gouge in the hull gets blamed. Take the job, take the blame. Part of the instability is due to market players being very cynical about the Fed and the MMT (Moronic Monetary Theory) folks running things. Also major cynicism about the politicking by the Dept of Labor.
Ssnake Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 It's generally weak growth, as the results of the decarbonization follies are becoming harder and harder to ignore, that made the whole stock market situation unstable. Next, much of the global stock market growth is driven by a handful of tech giants. All that's needed is a slight disturbance of a precarious equilibrium; we may have just experienced peak AI hype, and as much of the tech giants' share price inflation was tied to that, well, a notable course correction results. Not sure if it qualifies as a crash (yet).
rmgill Posted August 6, 2024 Author Posted August 6, 2024 So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us?
Murph Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 I also would like to know what her policy positions are. And she picked probably the most Liberal/Communist Governor in the US today, the douchenozzle walsh.
Wobbly Head Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 56 minutes ago, rmgill said: So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us? As soon as she is told what her policies are she will tell you.
bfng3569 Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 2 hours ago, rmgill said: So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us? i was going to ask the other day... if you support Kamala, what has she done as VP that you support and what has she done prior to becoming VP that you support?
seahawk Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 5 minutes ago, rmgill said: Her platform is "she's not Trump". And that this even works, does not speak to well for Trump either.
rmgill Posted August 6, 2024 Author Posted August 6, 2024 No, it speaks poorly of the DNC electorate who are fixated on mean tweets and the fact that Trump is a bit of an Ass. The vast bulk of the hardcore liberals I know who are anything but big on polite norms and decorum are the ones who were MOST upset. These are people who are quite brash and vocal and not the normal mode of quiet politeness.
Ivanhoe Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 3 hours ago, rmgill said: So, for the Kamala supporters, what are her policy positions? Can you tell us? I think everybody knows that Kamala's primary position is kneeling.
seahawk Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 But the DNC does not force Trump to behave like an ass or post mean tweets. So either those are also gaining favour with his electorate or it would be very stupid to energize the other party without need.
Ivanhoe Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 https://uncoverdc.com/2024/08/04/fams-whistleblowers-report-tulsi-gabbard-on-quiet-skies-list Quote In an exclusive breaking story, several Federal Air Marshal whistleblowers have come forward with information showing that former U.S. Representative and Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is currently enrolled in the Quiet Skies program. Quiet Skies is a TSA surveillance program with its own compartmentalized suspected terrorist watchlist. It is the same program being weaponized against J6 defendants and their families. Quiet Skies is allegedly used to protect traveling Americans from suspected domestic terrorists. The photo below is a screenshot from the actual Target Package used by the FAMS to surveil Gabbard. . Quote The whistleblowers first shared the information with Sonya LaBosco, the Executive Director of the Air Marshal National Council (AMNC), a national advocacy group for the Federal Air Marshals (FAMs). According to LaBosco, at least one of the whistleblowers is ready to go on the record with pertinent documentation. LaBosco shared that Gabbard is unaware she has two Explosive Detection Canine Teams, one Transportation Security Specialist (explosives), one plainclothes TSA Supervisor, and three Federal Air Marshalls on every flight she boards. LaBosco has attempted to contact Gabbard and her staff but has not received a response. . Quote According to LaBosco, Gabbard’s enrollment in Quiet Skies is likely politically motivated. Air Marshals were first assigned to Gabbard on Jul. 23, a day after she criticized Kamala Harris, Biden, and the National Security State in an interview with Laura Ingraham. FAMs were mobilized on Jul. 24 and assigned to their first flight with her on Jul. 25. Gabbard posted the interview on Twitter, as shared below. The Dems and their Deep State flying monkey squadron are not psychologically well.
Mr King Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 When all this "anti terrorism" bureaucracy was being put in place post 9/11, people warned that they would turn it all against domestic enemies of the state. Many, including myself, poo pooed it, dismissing their warnings. Well they were right.
rmgill Posted August 6, 2024 Author Posted August 6, 2024 1 hour ago, seahawk said: But the DNC does not force Trump to behave like an ass or post mean tweets. So either those are also gaining favour with his electorate or it would be very stupid to energize the other party without need. No, but they condone their own being asses in their own way, or making nice sounds while they screw people in interviews. So, yes, you're going to get people who will be asses back to the Delores Umbridges of the world.
rmgill Posted August 6, 2024 Author Posted August 6, 2024 47 minutes ago, Mr King said: When all this "anti terrorism" bureaucracy was being put in place post 9/11, people warned that they would turn it all against domestic enemies of the state. Many, including myself, poo pooed it, dismissing their warnings. Well they were right. I had arguments with friends who strongly stated that no one in the federal government would ever release the sensitive information they'd hoovered up in the normal course of their operations, there'd be hell to pay and folks would lose jobs, pensions, see charges. What have we seen from the IRS releasing personal information? Nothing. That doesn't even touch on the stuff the FBI gathers with the help of the other alphabet agencies.
Josh Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 5 hours ago, Wobbly Head said: As soon as she is told what her policies are she will tell you. By who?
Josh Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 3 hours ago, rmgill said: No, it speaks poorly of the DNC electorate who are fixated on mean tweets and the fact that Trump is a bit of an Ass. The vast bulk of the hardcore liberals I know who are anything but big on polite norms and decorum are the ones who were MOST upset. These are people who are quite brash and vocal and not the normal mode of quiet politeness. There clearly are a lot of independents intending to vote for both candidates if the polls are to be believed.
Josh Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 2 hours ago, seahawk said: But the DNC does not force Trump to behave like an ass or post mean tweets. So either those are also gaining favour with his electorate or it would be very stupid to energize the other party without need. Moreover the DNC does not force Trump to fight his own party in GA or have disastrous interviews in hostile venues. But in any case “not Trump” is enough for me. If the GOP had put Haley in maybe I would do more serious research, but if the Republican nominee is the Jan 6th riot instigator who tried to have Pence nullify the last election, then policy barely matters.
rmgill Posted August 6, 2024 Author Posted August 6, 2024 9 minutes ago, Josh said: By who? Good question. Where is her policies page?
17thfabn Posted August 6, 2024 Posted August 6, 2024 (edited) 2 hours ago, Ivanhoe said: https://uncoverdc.com/2024/08/04/fams-whistleblowers-report-tulsi-gabbard-on-quiet-skies-list . . The Dems and their Deep State flying monkey squadron are not psychologically well. I want to fly on the flights Tulsi Gabbard is on. They would be ultra safe with all the security! The down side would be my wife smacking me in the head every time Tulsi walks by and I almost get whiplash. Edited August 6, 2024 by 17thfabn
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now