Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah, they are going to have fun making that stick in court, assuming it gets that far which it wont.

Not that im defending it, its just the police being politically correct clueless fuckwits again.

  • Replies 450
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/the-stakes-are-high-as-supreme-court-considers-this-obscure-unconstitutional-tax

Quote

The Supreme Court is set to determine whether Congress , for the purposes of taxation, may classify unrealized capital gains as “income.” Should the justices rule in Moore vs. United States rule against the plaintiffs, the federal government effectively would gain seismic new powers to tax almost any property from which it hopes to extract revenue. This would conflict directly with the Constitution ’s plain text and original meaning.

 

Quote

The Moores in 2006 purchased a 13% share of an Indian company, KisanKraft, that provides farming equipment to impoverished regions. Since then, they never have received any dividend or other form of compensation or profit from this investment. They have seen no “income.” Nonetheless, they found themselves subjected to the MRT.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Quote

 

New EU rules needed

Parliament urges the Commission to address existing legal gaps and introduce new legislation against addictive design. If not addressed, MEPs say, Parliament should use its right of legislative initiative. Their report calls for an assessment and a ban on harmful addictive techniques not covered by the directive on Unfair Commercial Practice, such as infinite scroll, default auto play, constant push and read receipt notifications.

 

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/pt/press-room/20231208IPR15767/new-eu-rules-needed-to-address-digital-addiction

Posted
On 11/1/2023 at 7:28 PM, lucklucky said:

 

I thought I would do a follow up on this story to see if I could find the context behind it. Would you believe Ive looked through a dozen stories, and not one single one offers the name or the account of the guy whom made the video? And whats more, nobody seems to have mentioned it since?

Im not going to scream 'fake'. But it certainly to me looks highly suspicious.

Posted (edited)

Why Stuart, Visecrap 24 is now suddenly "highly suspicious" when they started talking about UK instead of Russia? :)

Edited by bojan
Posted

Man exercising free speech by posting video of free speech oppression, afraid of oppression; Film at 11.

 

Posted (edited)
On 12/15/2023 at 8:42 PM, bojan said:

Why Stuart, Visecrap 24 is now suddenly "highly suspicious" when they started talking about UK instead of Russia? :)

Because it wasnt just them posting it. If you do a search, ALL the British tabloids posted it it, leading usually with 'An unknown man'.... And nowhere along the line is there a confirmation that its not a setup.

 

 

Edited by Stuart Galbraith
Posted

If she had been there with 500 angry friends she could have stayed. Threat of Force is what allows it. Thats been made clear. 

Posted
1 hour ago, lucklucky said:

 

 

Is there more video that shows him being forced to leave because this ends right as he tells the cops he's outside the buffer zone.  Do the cops walk away because they realize they were in error?  Do they point out the protester is mistaken?  Do they just tell him to shut up and move?

Posted (edited)

It is a woman, i'll try to get more.

 

Found more info:

Quote

 

Livia Tossici-Bolt, 63, has brought a complaint against officers who forced her off of a public street, with support from ADF UK 

The retiree held a sign reading “PREGNANT? NEED HELP?”, while remaining outside the “buffer zone” around the local abortion facility in this instance

(...)

The officers accused Tossici-Bolt of standing within the local “buffer zone”; but video evidence confirms that the volunteer was outside of the zone’s boundary, and out of sight of the facility, at a distance of over 150m away. 

(...)

 

https://adf.uk/officers-confront-livia/

Edited by lucklucky
Posted

Well, with high-velocity laser-guided signs, even 150 meters is not a safe distance.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, lucklucky said:

 

These should be those Christian terrorists Stuart is so afraid of.

Edited by sunday
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
13 hours ago, Murph said:

PUSHBACK! FInally: Indiana has a portal for parents and students to report "Socialist Indoctrination" in schools.  Good for them.  Send the blue haired freaks to the unemployment line.

 

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2024/02/16/indiana-launches-portal-for-parents-to-report-socialist-indoctrination-n4926500

You should hear the whine from the local P.B.S. station :D

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 2/17/2024 at 2:35 AM, Rick said:

You should hear the whine from the local P.B.S. station :D

Let me guess, is the show 'DEMOCRACY NOW!', by chance?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...