shrike6 Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 This is a document dump showing some of the thoughts and proposals for USARS Determining Priority for Regiments Aug 1982 https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/378376/20181760MNBT989107372F169205I001.pdf Regimental Grouping Proposal Sept 1985 https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/758873/20184115MN004802.pdf AR 600-82 May 1986 update https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/402284/20184897MNBT989110590F67938I012.pdf Aviation Lineage and tank Destroyers Jan 1987 https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/572475/20184507MN002534.pdf Regimental/Corps Affiliation Apr 1987 https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/971763/20181396MN000052.pdf Information Paper Apr 1987 https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/402276/20184897MNBT989110590F67938I004.pdf AR 600-82 June 1990 https://www.17thinfantry.org/documents/dmor/AR 600-82 US ARMY Regimental System.pdf
shrike6 Posted August 25, 2023 Author Posted August 25, 2023 Rankings of Regiments unknown date https://emu.usahec.org/alma/multimedia/378367/20181760MNBT989107372F169203I006.pdf
RichTO90 Posted August 26, 2023 Posted August 26, 2023 Only the U.S. Army would think to lump the lineage of aviation and tank destroyer elements together...
shrike6 Posted August 26, 2023 Author Posted August 26, 2023 True although it was just a subject that was brought up. Thankfully logic prevailed and they kept all aviation regiments tied to aviation.
FALightFighter Posted August 27, 2023 Posted August 27, 2023 On 8/26/2023 at 1:17 PM, RichTO90 said: Only the U.S. Army would think to lump the lineage of aviation and tank destroyer elements together... As you probably know, but others may not, the linkage of aviation and tank destroyer was not a serious proposal by the Army, but apparently the idea submitted by one CPT. At the time, Aviation was just becoming a stand-alone branch, and not a secondary skill set where individuals were seconded from a basic branch. The proposal, apparently, was to highlight the anti-tank capabilities of the Apache (which was also coming into service at around the same time) separately from the rest of the branch instead of focusing on the commonality (they all fly) across the branch. Alternately, linking aviation to tank destroyers makes a much sense as linking it to horse cavalry
shep854 Posted August 28, 2023 Posted August 28, 2023 In his tank destroyer videos, Manic Moran has pointed out that Apaches, given their primary mission as tank hunters, are essentially the airborne successors to TDs.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now