Stefan Kotsch Posted Tuesday at 03:44 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 03:44 PM 5 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: That is how this war is changing economy of Russia. Somehow successful market economies work completely differently. Has Russia perhaps discovered unknown economic principles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanoid Posted Tuesday at 03:47 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 03:47 PM 3 minutes ago, Stefan Kotsch said: Somehow successful market economies work completely differently. Has Russia perhaps discovered unknown economic principles? Juche? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn239 Posted Tuesday at 04:31 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:31 PM (edited) 6 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: That is weird take, taking into account amount of "rubles" (actually, USD) were going to Western bank assets etc. Now, if we imagine repairing the submarine, welders and electricians in Sevastopol or Novorossiysk will get Roubles, not waiters or sales assistants in London/Milan/Marbelia/Miami. That is how this war is changing economy of Russia. Many posters for a decade have been espousing the need to stand up to Russia for Ukraine, with deterrence if possible but to the last Ukrainian if necessary. Now that the last Ukrainian is if not in sight, then at least in the cue, you see the switch in narrative to one of there being some sort of strategic value to inflicting attrition on Russian equipment in a Cold War with China. Edited Tuesday at 04:32 PM by glenn239 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Alymov Posted Tuesday at 05:18 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:18 PM 41 minutes ago, glenn239 said: Many posters for a decade have been espousing the need to stand up to Russia for Ukraine, with deterrence if possible but to the last Ukrainian if necessary. Now that the last Ukrainian is if not in sight, then at least in the cue, you see the switch in narrative to one of there being some sort of strategic value to inflicting attrition on Russian equipment in a Cold War with China. Interestingly, the same point about "Weaken the Russia" mantra here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted Wednesday at 03:57 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 03:57 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB Posted Thursday at 02:16 PM Share Posted Thursday at 02:16 PM On 9/19/2023 at 11:06 AM, Roman Alymov said: That is weird take, taking into account amount of "rubles" (actually, USD) were going to Western bank assets etc. Now, if we imagine repairing the submarine, welders and electricians in Sevastopol or Novorossiysk will get Roubles, not waiters or sales assistants in London/Milan/Marbelia/Miami. That is how this war is changing economy of Russia. That's the broken window economic model. It's broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ink Posted Friday at 08:14 AM Share Posted Friday at 08:14 AM 17 hours ago, DB said: That's the broken window economic model. It's broken. It may be broken but it remains very popular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Alymov Posted Friday at 12:23 PM Share Posted Friday at 12:23 PM 21 hours ago, DB said: That's the broken window economic model. It's broken. Wrong analogy is leading to wrong conclusions.You are missing the point of Russian economic model. It is not window, but pipeline system. It was constructed as mechanism to pump out resources from Russia to West (for example, even if it was not Russian oil&gas sold to Europe, but Russian nuclear reactor sold to country outside of West - final destination of money was Westen bank or Western assets). Now this system is broken, and money/resources are staying more or less in Russia. One could complain about "system is broken", others would see it as good result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seahawk Posted Friday at 01:59 PM Share Posted Friday at 01:59 PM After the offensive retook about 0.25% of the area liberated by Russia and killed tens of thousands soldiers, the Ukraine is practically done. It is time that they surrender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Kotsch Posted Friday at 02:56 PM Share Posted Friday at 02:56 PM 54 minutes ago, seahawk said: the Ukraine is practically done. It is time that they surrender. Didn't Ukraine want to conquer Moscow within 3 days? To then de-Stalinize Russia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike1158 Posted Friday at 03:14 PM Share Posted Friday at 03:14 PM They could have hired Wagner for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted yesterday at 03:09 AM Share Posted yesterday at 03:09 AM A cruise missile for a sub is a very good trade, blocking a drydock for a considerable amount of time is icing on the cake. I do agree with Roman is that the days of large warships in the Black Sea are likely numbered, but I do see a need for naval vessels, just smaller and faster ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 14 hours ago, Colin said: A cruise missile for a sub is a very good trade, blocking a drydock for a considerable amount of time is icing on the cake. I do agree with Roman is that the days of large warships in the Black Sea are likely numbered, but I do see a need for naval vessels, just smaller and faster ones. Seems you just found a place to send all those LCSs the USN wants to retire... Edited 10 hours ago by sunday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago On 9/22/2023 at 1:23 PM, Roman Alymov said: Wrong analogy is leading to wrong conclusions.You are missing the point of Russian economic model. It is not window, but pipeline system. It was constructed as mechanism to pump out resources from Russia to West (for example, even if it was not Russian oil&gas sold to Europe, but Russian nuclear reactor sold to country outside of West - final destination of money was Westen bank or Western assets). Now this system is broken, and money/resources are staying more or less in Russia. One could complain about "system is broken", others would see it as good result. The window mender and glass vendor both believe it is a good system, everyone else knows it's shit. Defence spending is a necessary evil, to prevent paranoid maniacs from inventing invasion excuses and murdering their neighbours. Escalating your military spending beyond that required for a credible self-defence capability is dumb as rocks, and predicating your entire economic model on it results in North Korea. You're welcome to that model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now