Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think they're going to be wary of Algeria either way. The Algerians know which side their bread is buttered on though, I don't expect anything too stupid from them.

  • Replies 411
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
14 minutes ago, urbanoid said:

The yuan becoming a global currency was never in the cards and I don't think even Strannik considered that a possibility, for reasons in that link and others similarly involving control. China will never let the yuan be a freely traded currency, so Do Not Pass Go. The only thing that sounded like it had a hope of truly dislodging the dollar in a noticeable way was a gold standard BRICS currency, and even then, the bulk of world trade would still likely use dollars or Euros or yen just because most of the industrialized world has no interest in increasing China or Russia's power at the expense of the US.

Posted (edited)

BRICS Update:

- Xi: "... International rules must be written jointly, rather than dictated by those with the strongest muscles or the loudest voice!.. We need to accelerate the BRICS's expansion process."

- Naledi Pandor, SA FM: "we have agreed on the matter of #BRICS expansion"

Announcements will be made shortly.

 

Edited by Strannik
Posted (edited)

BRICS have agreed to admit six more countries.

The following countries will be full members of BRICS effective of 1/1/2024:  

🇦🇷 Argentina
🇪🇬 Egypt
🇪🇹 Ethiopia
🇮🇷 Iran
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
🇦🇪 UAE

Edited by Strannik
Posted

Lula: BRICS initiates 'working group' to explore Trade Reference Currency ("which would not replace our national currency")

Posted

This shows that a key leverage the US had versus Iran - Washington being the gatekeeper for who is in and who is out of the community of nations - is now almost completely lost. This is a leverage the US had during the earlier JCPOA negotiations.

As the world moves away from unipolarity, the US is also losing the GateKeeper power. No one single state can any longer decide who is in the community of Nations and who is a pariah.

This does not mean that Iran no longer needs a deal with the US to lift sanctions, or that those sanctions are meaningless. Rather, it means that the US has less leverage than before in such a negotiation. Because new options are opening up for Iran. 

What the US controls, however, is who is a member of the ill-defined "rules-based order." Which increasingly is becoming nations who seek to sustain American unipolarity and resist the global shifts in power. The RBO is turning into a bloc rather than the governing system. 

Fascinating that the UAE and Saudi are also joining. That makes it difficult for the US to portray it as an anti-American grouping. As my colleague @globalsarang points out, after all, the US had troops in those countries.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Strannik said:

Fascinating that the UAE and Saudi are also joining. That makes it difficult for the US to portray it as an anti-American grouping. As my colleague @globalsarang points out, after all, the US had troops in those countries.

Had or still has?

Posted
1 hour ago, urbanoid said:

Had or still has?

Definitely still in Al Dhafra. Don’t think there’s a significant KSA presence now.

Posted (edited)

With these new members BRICS+ will:

- control 40% of world oil reserves

- control 50% of world oil production 

- become the biggest oil importing trading block

- has the largest oil importer in their ranks (China)

This and increasing trade in local currencies will be putting pressure on petro$ and then the block's "reference currency" will come.

$ of course is here with us to stay, but with time (and considering the fact that US will  have to inflate their debts away) it will be relegated to same role as British pound had (sic)

Edited by Strannik
Posted (edited)

Saudi Arabia is the most interesting case here.  US is still trying to make a three way deal (SA/US/IL) - a good article describing who wants what 👇 but looks like SA wants to sit on both chairs at the very least if the deal pans out, or to hedge if it won't.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/energy/2023/08/22/a-saudi-israeli-peace-deal-who-wants-what-and-why/ad09133e-40c2-11ee-9677-53cc50eb3f77_story.html

Edited by Strannik
Posted
14 hours ago, Strannik said:

With these new members BRICS+ will:

- control 40% of world oil reserves

- become the biggest oil importing trading block

- has the largest oil importer in their ranks (China)

This and increasing trade in local currencies will be putting pressure on petro$ and then the block's "reference currency" will come.

$ of course is here with us to stay, but with time (and considering the fact that US will  have to inflate their debts away) it will be relegated to same role as British pound had (sic)

This extension is the official end of western hegemony and the rise of new world order.

Posted
21 hours ago, Strannik said:

With these new members BRICS+ will:

- control 40% of world oil reserves

- control 50% of world oil production 

- become the biggest oil importing trading block

- has the largest oil importer in their ranks (China)

This and increasing trade in local currencies will be putting pressure on petro$ and then the block's "reference currency" will come.

$ of course is here with us to stay, but with time (and considering the fact that US will  have to inflate their debts away) it will be relegated to same role as British pound had (sic)

And for those who value Peter Zeihan - here is his invaluable opinion:

 

Posted

I have to say the inclusion of Argentina and Iran doesn’t make for a very impressive roster. I wonder what drove the country selection.

Posted
1 hour ago, Josh said:

I have to say the inclusion of Argentina and Iran doesn’t make for a very impressive roster. I wonder what drove the country selection.

As far as Argentina goes, my guess it's Brazil's doing in hope to improve their situation.  Remains to be seen.

Iran produces 4+% of world's oil and is a perfect candidate for this economic block as a lot of it's needs can be fulfilled by China and Russia and China can take all it's oil.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Strannik said:

As far as Argentina goes, my guess it's Brazil's doing in hope to improve their situation.  Remains to be seen.

Iran produces 4+% of world's oil and is a perfect candidate for this economic block as a lot of it's needs can be fulfilled by China and Russia and China can take all it's oil.

 

Not sure what need Russia fills with regards to Iran, outside maybe some day providing the MiG-35s it promised.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Josh said:

Not sure what need Russia fills with regards to Iran, outside maybe some day providing the MiG-35s it promised.

Food.  Weapon systems such as, but not limited to, Su-35s (which I suppose you meant).  Nuclear energy.  And much more.

Posted
10 hours ago, Strannik said:

As far as Argentina goes, my guess it's Brazil's doing in hope to improve their situation.  Remains to be seen.

Iran produces 4+% of world's oil and is a perfect candidate for this economic block as a lot of it's needs can be fulfilled by China and Russia and China can take all it's oil.

 

Both Argentina and Iran are oil producer countries.

Posted (edited)

https://bnn.network/politics/austrian-economist-proposes-division-of-brazil-into-five-states-amidst-brics-partnership-with-russia/

On possible retaliation against BRICS members, another Austrian, moustacheless this time, plays geopolitics

Unless Herr Fehlinger is quickly disauthorized, made to resign, and retire to some monastery, Putin just got confirmation that the current rules of Western World want a balcanization in Russia.

Edited by sunday
Posted (edited)

That piece of excrement in vague humanoid shape?

BTW, Milica Rakic for those unaware.

Edited by bojan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...