Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Rick said:

All of what is being discussed about governmental finances; past, present, and future,  has been verified and will be so again in the Bible, specifically the Book of Revelation.  I wouldn't trouble yourself to go very deep into the details and nuances of this prophetic book, but it is an eye opener into what was written long ago and what is happening now. 

For the U.S., we are seeing this in the actions of one of the close associates of the "Whore of Babylon," the Democratic Party, the syphilitic chancre on and in the politics of our once great nation. 

15898445837861774098aa6a75449e07d.jpg

 

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Josh said:

15898445837861774098aa6a75449e07d.jpg

 

All we need (in addition to other highjacks) is a Bible thumpers vs Satanists (even in jest) flame war here 🙄

You are on notice of my MAD response to your fav topics ;) 

Edited by Strannik
Posted
On 10/5/2023 at 1:15 AM, Josh said:

The other problem is that just like China, a U.S. depression would not occur in a vacuum. Actually what I think is more probable is that either China or the US hits the wall, and then that brings down the other one. And of course that ruins everyone else as well, since that would be half the global economy.
 

But it is not the case that either nation could have a thriving economy while the other crashed…they, and the world, are linked together too closely for any meaningful decoupling.

Oh, I think that a decoupling will be painful for everyone. But I think that Zeihan makes a pretty good case that the U.S. could establish a pretty solid, non-globalized economy (maybe linked to Scandinavia, UK, Australia, Taiwan and Japan, but not completely globalized) in a way that most other countries cannot, for a variety of demographic and geographic reasons. Your assessment of his logic may vary, I find him persuasive.

Posted
33 minutes ago, FALightFighter said:

Oh, I think that a decoupling will be painful for everyone. But I think that Zeihan makes a pretty good case that the U.S. could establish a pretty solid, non-globalized economy (maybe linked to Scandinavia, UK, Australia, Taiwan and Japan, but not completely globalized) in a way that most other countries cannot, for a variety of demographic and geographic reasons. Your assessment of his logic may vary, I find him persuasive.

Well I would agree that the US would be in a better position to organize an economic block that China, after a painful decoupling. The US is less dependent on trade and geographically has a much better position. But any decoupling over almost any time scale is going to be painful for both and at this point an economic crash in one almost certainly affects the other the same way. In 2008 China largely avoided economic damage with huge stimulus to infrastructure projects; they  already are over invested in infrastructure and have run up about as much debt as the US in record time. Neither country's economy could withstand a large global downturn, whatever the casue.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Why America is all out of munitions.

Basically comes down to a responsible financial management in Pentagon (I know, feature, not a bug ;) ) so posting here:

“we have a trillion dollar defense budget, but there are just two people in the Department of Defense who look at mergers in the defense base. You couldn’t staff the morning shift of a small coffee shop with that”

https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/why-america-is-out-of-ammunition

Edited by Strannik
Posted

Meanwhile Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the surge in longer-term bond yields reflects a strong US economy, not the jump in government borrowing 🤣.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Rick said:

Only temporarily. We win in the end.  

Assuming either side exists at all, which I personally doubt.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
18 minutes ago, glenn239 said:

Add it to the list of Biden-era avoidable disasters.....

There is nothing avoidable there... at least not in a scope of any single presidency.

Posted
1 hour ago, Strannik said:

Moody's Cuts USA's Aaa Rating Outlook To 'Negative'

Ironically because a bunch of MAGA republicans who are all about reducing debt are holding the US credit rating hostage, rather than the underlying debt.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Josh said:

Ironically because a bunch of MAGA republicans who are all about reducing debt are holding the US credit rating hostage, rather than the underlying debt.

No party is serious about that.  It will go on until it will blow up.

Posted
4 hours ago, Strannik said:

No party is serious about that.  It will go on until it will blow up.

I’m not arguing that, but one party is making it worse for the sake of performance art rather than making it better.

Posted
11 hours ago, Strannik said:

Moody's Cuts USA's Aaa Rating Outlook To 'Negative'

Reasons for the cut:

1. Downside risks to U.S. fiscal strength have increased

2. Fiscal deficits to remain very large

3. Debt affordability to be significantly weakened

Posted
5 hours ago, Josh said:

I’m not arguing that, but one party is making it worse for the sake of performance art rather than making it better.

Trump handed Biden a viable portfolio on the debt and deficit.  Biden proceeded to make things much worse.

Posted
On 10/28/2023 at 5:46 PM, Josh said:

Assuming either side exists at all, which I personally doubt.

Read Titus. 

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Remember when middle class was considered a backbone of America?  Well it's in a sorry state now.

1971 - 61% of U.S. adults were considered middle class.

 2021 -  it's just 50%.

The top 1% now holds more wealth than all of the middle class.

 

Image

  • 1 month later...
Posted

This explains constant moaning of libdem media and pundits a la Krugman about stlilly unwashed masses seeing inflation when there is none - just because you cooked the books it doesn't make the issues go away - if US had kept calculating CPI in the same way as in the 1970s, inflation last year reached 18%...

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...