Jump to content

War in Ukraine, technical and military aspects only


bojan

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, crazyinsane105 said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-buys-81-soviet-era-145127813.html
 

Quite surprising that Russia didn’t bother purchasing them just for the sake of ensuring they didn’t fall into Ukrainian hands. 

30 years of Kazakhstan climate (Sahara like summers and Siberia like winters) makes those practically useless for anything other than mockups. IMO no useful spares can be really acquired from those.

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It might have just been a bulk rate deal to clear the entire inventory; I cannot imagine most of those aircraft are good for anything but scrap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bojan said:

30 years of Kazakhstan climate (Sahara like summers and Siberia like winters) makes those practically useless for anything other than mockups. IMO no useful spares can be really acquired from those.

Also, one of the conditions for buyer is to scrap the aircraft in Kazakhstan. It seems someone published the information, and as it circulates the possibility becomes a fact. 

Good article in El País about how Russia has adapted and improved Armed Forces following lessons learned in Ukraine. Authors interviewed Ruslan Pukhov, director of CAST.

https://elpais.com/internacional/2024-04-28/rusia-aprende-de-los-errores-militares-en-ucrania-y-perfecciona-su-ejercito.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Josh said:

It might have just been a bulk rate deal to clear the entire inventory; I cannot imagine most of those aircraft are good for anything but scrap.

A thought occurred to me. I wonder if they are buying American, and offloading their old junk was part of the deal? Kind of like getting the delivery guys delivering your new oven to take away the old one. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Josh said:

A lot of the Ukraine aid package is actually money funding US production. Apparently it puts the US Army arsenals back on track for 100,000 155mm per month in a little over a year:

https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/04/goal-100k-artillery-shells-month-sight-army-says/396047/

 

And a lot of that money is going to go... Well, we all know how defence budgets work by now, don't we?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought GLSDB was going to be of little use. Its flight profile is an unpowered glide from high altitude and its payload is all of 40lbs of HE. The slow approach is going to make it more vulnerable to shoot downs and keep it inside a GPS denied area longer, while the blast radius is small enough that effectiveness rapidly falls off with inaccuracy. There’s a reason the U.S. never bought it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russian mechanics inspect the Ukrainian M1150 demining vehicle. The video shows a Ukrainian M1150 mine clearance vehicle made in America. The M1150 was hit by a drone in the weak spot of the surveillance camera, the crew lost visibility and drove into a minefield in the Berdychi area. It was difficult to evacuate the M1150 due to its heavy weight, it reaches 75 tons; several vehicles were used for evacuation. Due to its heavy weight, it is better to use the machine on dry ground. The M1150 mine clearing vehicle was developed in 2009 on the basis of the M1A1 Abrams tank and is considered the best in the US Army for work on the front line. The M1150 has good armor with dynamic protection and is designed for making passages in minefields. The M1150 is equipped with a blade mine sweeper that plows the ground, lifting mines to the surface and throwing them aside. The trawl can be dropped without leaving the car; it is mounted on a hydraulic “High Lift Adapter”. Also, instead of a trawl, the “adapter” provides for the installation of a bulldozer bucket, after which the machine can be used as a bulldozer. The machine has signal flags that are stuck into the ground by two pneumatic devices, indicating the demining area. In the rear compartment of the vehicle there are MK22 Mod 4 rockets with charges attached to them, which are 107-meter fabric “sleeves” equipped with a detonation cable and filled with explosives. The projectile is fired from the M58A3 launcher at a length of 100 meters; after detonation, an area up to 8 meters wide is cleared. The M1150 mine clearing vehicle is armed with a 12.7 mm machine gun, has a crew of 2 people, and the estimated cost of the M1150 is about $14 million. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bojan said:

30 years of Kazakhstan climate (Sahara like summers and Siberia like winters) makes those practically useless for anything other than mockups. IMO no useful spares can be really acquired from those.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mandeb48 said:

Steel production in the last 25 years. Not directly related to the topic of war but....

c2RlbGFub3VuYXMucnUvdXBsb2Fkcy85LzEvOTE3MTcxNDM4MjA0MV9vcmlnLmpwZWc_X19pZD0xNTk0NDk=.jpg

The decline of Ukraine is sharper if we go back further. In 1990 it produced over 54.6 million tons. In 1980 it even outproduced China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Josh said:

I doubt American, but what are they replacing their planes with? Chinese?

I don't think they have acute need for new combat aircraft, they have reasonably new fleet of Su-30's.

Motivation for US in this deal might have also been to prevent any possible resale to Syria.

Kazakhstan was the last MiG-27 operator, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yama said:

I don't think they have acute need for new combat aircraft, they have reasonably new fleet of Su-30's.

Motivation for US in this deal might have also been to prevent any possible resale to Syria.

Kazakhstan was the last MiG-27 operator, right?

Correct, India retired their MiG-27s a while ago 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, crazyinsane105 said:

Yeah, the MiG-21s are still being used. They are hoping that MiG-21s can be replaced with Tejas and future orders of Rafales…who knows 

Jesus that must suck...there is no way the pilot is younger than the airframe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Josh said:

I doubt American, but what are they replacing their planes with? Chinese?

Rafales apparently. Well, bang goes that idea.

https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2023/11/28/kazakhstan-and-uzbekistan-plan-to-buy-rafale-fighter-jets-and-a400m-transport-aircraft-retires-russian-jets/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...