Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So this is a complex issue, but basically states that primarily tax consumption will appear more regressive than states that primarily tax income.   In addition, this mixes in both state and local taxes.  Just looking at state-level taxes, in 2018 (the year this data is taken from), the state of Texas levied about $2100 per capita from residents, while the state of California levied about $4400. (https://www.taxadmin.org/2018-state-tax-revenue)

Posted

A Equitable....that's how you know it's bullcrap. 

Posted

The more I look at the actual revenue generated by each state, I just can't see how this could possibly be true.  For example, state and local property tax levied per capita is $1608 in CA vs $1874 in TX (2017 data).  Other than this single study from ITEP, literally everything else out there pegs Texas as a significantly lower tax state than California -- and not just because of California's tax on top incomes.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...