Jump to content

Post war repurposing of tanks


Mikel2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

There were various Matilda IIs, M3 Mediums etc used on Australian farms as tractors after when peace broke out.  I don't know about Universal Carriers though, as they would have been the obvious choice for any spears into ploughshares efforts, having a simple to maintain and access engine and spare parts being abundantly available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not strictly on topic but, in the Soviet Union in the 1970's the Russians used ex-tanks for farming purposes as due to economic mismanagement they built ten's of thousands of tanks but no farm tractors.

Edited by TrustMe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrustMe said:

Not strictly on topic but, in the Soviet Union in the 1970's the Russians used ex-tanks for farming purposes as due to economic mismanagement they built ten's of thousands of tanks but no farm tractors.

Up the early '50s they have used written off SU-76 and T-70 light tanks, but nothing really in mass use after that.

What did happen is that on "army owned farms" occasionally written off combat equipment was used, but that should not be confused with general practice.

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the above story from my dad. Back in the 1970's, his cousin - who was a committed ultra left winger, went to the Soviet Union for a holiday. When he came back he told my dad that 'There never going to win'. The economic was in such a bad way even then. 

I'll bow to you're knowledge Bojan but I do remember the above story when my dad told me in the late 1980's.

 

Edited by TrustMe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is lot of common myths that originated in SSSR itself. This is one of such. It is not to say there was not a lack of agricultural machinery (in fact even in the '80s they lacked something like 20%), but using turetless tanks because there was not enough tractors is one of those stories. Except maybe some military owned land where they might have actually used "tank" as a tractor for plowing* (you can not really use it for harvesting, it is going to destroy too much of the crop).

That Soviets are not going to win was obvious in the '60s already to those that have paid attention. What people did not realize was that Soviets could collapse, which is entirely different thing from "not winning".

*IIRC locally last use of M3 halftracks was on military owned farms.

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder then if my cousin lied to my dad. Oh well. He was a committed Communist though.

 

I think that after the Great Patriotic war, with 20 million dead and large parts of the country devastated. Having a rivalry with the US whose GDP had increased during the war. It was an uphill struggle to remain parity with it's enemies. 

Edited by TrustMe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TrustMe said:

I wonder then if my cousin lied to my dad.

Did not have to invent it, it was a common myth in USSR itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bojan said:

Up the early '50s they have used written off SU-76 and T-70 light tanks, but nothing really in mass use after that.

That makes some sense. When I read the headline "what about the fuel economy" immediately came to my mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DougRichards said:

There were various Matilda IIs, M3 Mediums etc used on Australian farms as tractors after when peace broke out.  I don't know about Universal Carriers though, as they would have been the obvious choice for any spears into ploughshares efforts, having a simple to maintain and access engine and spare parts being abundantly available.

Some of the carriers were turned into tractors. If you have a look for "Strickland Carrier" you should find some.Usually cut down armour, reduced diameter drive sprockets, and converted to run on power kerosene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've certainly seen a few pictures of M3 or M5 Stuart light tank hulls with exploratory drill rigs mounted on them.  

Certainly Soviet DT75 crawler tractors and similar do indeed have a tank-like look to them but I am unsure if that's just chance or if there is anything more to it than that?  Perhaps the same tooling was used for their fabrication as was used for light tanks during WW2?  I'd like to know more about that one myself.

I suppose one of the most "famous" of repurposed tanks would be the T-34 tank hull with the BS-3 100mm gun; a weird looking hybrid vehicle created by the Egyptians with a number of these being captured by the IDF in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.

There was (or perhaps still is) a T-34 tank hull with jet engines from a MiG installed to clear runways of snow and apparently also used to put out chemical fires as well?  That's a curious one and still being developed from what I understand.  How the vehicle doesn't become airborne itself I'll never know. 😲

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easier to use tanks than to find enough trucks, load them and drive them on the bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bojan said:

Easier to use tanks than to find enough trucks, load them and drive them on the bridge.

Only if there are lots of tanks at hand. Trucks are used in most other places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Converted tanks were used in surface mining in the GDR.  Because of the extremely difficult terrain. As a basis for cranes and excavators.  And for moving the railroad tracks of the very-big bucket excavators - but that has not proven itself, the power transmission was not designed for this, and the wear and tear was excessive.

https://www.bauforum24.biz/forums/topic/22593-militartechnik-im-tagebau/

 

T-34 with rolers, idler and sprocket from T-54/55

IMG_3014.jpg.a1c3a0e40649d5a401bbd2143acf38c2.jpg

 

T-54/55  ( for moving the railroad tracks of the very-big bucket excavators)

1234.jpg.76425be2b2fb191cd1da16e1f71f248e.jpg

Edited by Stefan Kotsch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stefan Kotsch said:

But that has not proven itself.  The power transmission was not designed for this, and the wear and tear was excessive

Indeed. Tracked earth moving vehicles are designed to maximize torque in sprocket/force in the tracks, so they tend to be quite slow. Speed is more important in AFVs, so the final drive parts are not engineered to handle those greater torque values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

French Normandy prospered from the various military mechanicals left in place when the armies moved on, raising it from truly primitive oxen powered agriculture to fully mechanized farming within the decade. Today it still ranks in the forefront. This included using jeep engines and chassis to run the pumps taking water out of the canals and rivers, etc and irrigating their fields. Trucks and tracked vehicles were pressed into all kinds of uses, and a very strong scrap iron business emerged from the battlefield and base leftovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for machinery used in farming, there is a TV programme called Combat Dealers. Guy in it was perusing a farmyard in the Ardenne for stuff that might be left behind. Went in a milding parlour and the column holding the roof up is an 88mm gun barrel from a King Tiger. He told the farmer if they ever knocked it down, he wanted ot buy it. :D

At a military show about 20 years ago, I saw a caravan hauled behind a steam traction engine using what appeared to be Cromwell or possibly Crusader wheels. Id love to know where he found them. Im annoyed I dont have a photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...