Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, glenn239 said:

Presidents can issue wide ranging executive orders based on national security.  But Trump's done anyways, so there's no point ordering Twitter restore his account now.

What you mean? i said that Twitter will not punish Biden for a racist text.

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
11 hours ago, lucklucky said:

I already posted it.

Democrats are now Marxists. So use racism, sexism as a class system too exploit as a way to get power and punish the groups they find resisting their power.

But i don't think it will be a race war, but a war against government.

I hope that you're right but it appears to me that the elites are trying to create a race war or class war to channel that anger away from it being a war against the government.  

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, lucklucky said:

What you mean? i said that Twitter will not punish Biden for a racist text.

Twitter will not punish Biden because Biden will now has the ability to declare their behaviour contrary to national security, not because the companies that just shit all over the authority and prestige of the Executive Office will suddenly become constitutional patriots.  Trump is on his way out, so Twitter no longer fears Trump bringing down the hammer on them in the form of an executive order.  

Edited by glenn239
Posted
4 minutes ago, glenn239 said:

Twitter will not punish Biden because Biden will now has the ability to declare their behaviour contrary to national security, not because the companies that just shit all over the authority and prestige of the Executive Office will suddenly become constitutional patriots.  Trump is on his way out, so Twitter no longer fears Trump bringing down the hammer on them in the form of an executive order.  

This.

Posted
53 minutes ago, nitflegal said:

I hope that you're right but it appears to me that the elites are trying to create a race war or class war to channel that anger away from it being a war against the government.  

 Unfortunately history has taught us that those thugs that the Elites thought they could control end up taking control almost every dictator has started this way.

Posted
Okay, place your bets. Which country is the US going to invade and have an endless war against in order to "bring us together against a common enemy"? Name the country and the kickoff date and then we can refer back to this to see who wins. (and someone will inevitably win).
Super divided country (polls show about 70% of republicans and 30% of democrats think civil war is probable, and those are just the ones who want to admit it), we've got an unpopular president half the country despises (and the other half doesn't actually like him either, they just voted against the orange dude they really hate) and there is zero common ground between our two mutually exclusive philosophies who hate each other.
So finding some little foreign country to go to war against will be a no brainer for our Ivy League Think Tankers. Democrats love war when they're in charge. Establishment republican leadership also loves war, and they know most republican voters are patriotic, so they'll be busy hating foreigners/terrorists/whatever instead of simmering in discontent against our own useless leadership. We can all unite against Those Guys, and forget about how we're getting fucked over by our own government at home.
Plus, war is a great excuse for government power grabs, which both sides love. Our last endless war is old and tired, and they wrung all the power grabs out of that they could. They can read your mail and tap your phones plus as an added bonus, all those nifty tools meant to be against terrorists can be conveniently be weaponized against your political opponents and you never even get held accountable for it. What politician could resist that?
Hell, they're using one stupid act of civil disobedience that did 1/100th the damage of any given Saturday night in Portland to justify their allies in Big Tech exerting Orwellian control over social media. Just imagine what they could accomplish with something actually destructive?
So war is a no brainer.
Place your bets, who is Kamala Harris going to invade? (because frankly, after listening to his last speech, if Joe Biden outlasts William Henry Harrison I'll be impressed)
If you say China, I'm gonna laugh at you. There's zero danger of that for the next four years.
Say what you will about Trump, love him or hate him, but these were the first debates in 20 years where war wasn't the focus. Hell, I don't think they mentioned war at all. But the establishment loves endless confusing war with nebulous goals and no way out. Democrats act like they hate war, but they LOVE war when they are in charge (they just hate the guys they make go fight it, totally different). Barack Obama still holds the record for drone strikes made by a Nobel Peace Prize Winner. But Kamala is sure to get the peace prize too (for existing) and she strikes me as ambitious!
My money is on Syria, and I'll say it'll kick off August 2021 (September is the end of the fiscal year so it'll work out well for budgeting). Syria is a complicated and confusing situation most Americans don't understand, convenient bad guys, and plenty of video of refugees to tug at the heart strings, so it's perfect.
But then again, they might mix it up and surprise me. It's been a long time since we've invaded anything in South or Central America. I doubt it will be anything in east Asia, because we will fully cede that sphere of influence to the PRC.
Of course, many of you will probably predict that the most likely war will by us vs. us. However our political elites don't actually want that, because they need us to keep paying taxes to pay for the interest on all those gender studies in Pakistan.
I figure the only way we don't invade somebody, is if we're too busy invading ourselves. Otherwise, look out some little 3rd world nation. You're about to get occupied for twenty years.
Posted

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/01/joe-bidens-racist-civil-rights-nominee-part-one.php

 

Biden continues his marxist-racist policies

Quote

Kristen Clarke is Joe Biden’s choice to head the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. But Biden probably doesn’t know Clarke, so in a sense she is the choice of the radical BLM crowd, which demanded a similarly radical pick in exchange for Biden having had the audacity to pick a White male to run the DOJ. It’s no coincidence that Al Sharpton was quick to praise the selection of Clarke.

It turns out, however, that Clarke has a history of racism and anti-Semitism. As a student at Harvard, where she was president of the Black Students Association, she presented her views on the alleged genetic differences between blacks and whites to the school newspaper (The Harvard Crimson).

Clarke claimed that blacks have “superior physical and mental abilities.” In support of this contention she cited the following:

One: Dr Richard King reveals that the core of the human brain is the ‘locus coeruleus,’ which is a structure that is Black, because it contains large amounts of neuro-melanin, which is essential for its operation.

Two: Black infants sit, crawl and walk sooner than whites.

Three: Carol Barnes notes that human mental processes are controlled by melanin — that same chemical which gives Blacks their superior physical and mental abilities.

Four: Some scientists have revealed that most whites are unable to produce melanin because their pineal glands are often calcified or non-functioning. Pineal calcification rates with Africans are five to 15 percent, Asians 15 to 25 percent and Europeans 60 to 80 percent. This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences between blacks and whites.

Five: Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.

Among Whites, Clarke held Jews in particular contempt. She endorsed an anti-Semitic professor, Tony Martin, author of the book, The Jewish Onslaught: Dispatches from the Wellesley Battlefront.

 

Posted

Meanwhile...

PBS (That is Public Broadcast Service)  principal counsel Michael Beller dreamed up big plans to punish his political opponents once Democrats are inaugurated in the White House.

“We go for all the Republican voters, and Homeland Security will take their children away,” Beller said in comments caught on tape and published by Project Veritas, comparing President Donald Trump to Hitler while saying the kids of Trump supporters should be sent to “re-education” or “enlightenment camps.”

They’re [re-education camps] nice,” the tax-payer-funded attorney promised. “They have Sesame Street characters in the classrooms, and [the children] watch PBS all day.” Without them, Beller prophesied, the nation was breeding a new generation of evil, intolerant children who Beller demanded be subject to 20th-century-style internment.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/12/pbs-lawyer-called-for-firebombing-white-house-kidnapping-republicans-children/

Posted

I'm shocked, Shocked, that Biden appointed an anti-Semite to a position of power.

Let me guess; the BJS and FBI stats for hate crimes will no longer categorize anti-Semitic violent crime as hate crime.

 

 

Posted (edited)

Not only anti semite,  look at this, she is a full blown black supremacist.

Quote

Clarke claimed that blacks have “superior physical and mental abilities.” In support of this contention she cited the following:

One: Dr Richard King reveals that the core of the human brain is the ‘locus coeruleus,’ which is a structure that is Black, because it contains large amounts of neuro-melanin, which is essential for its operation.

Two: Black infants sit, crawl and walk sooner than whites.

Three: Carol Barnes notes that human mental processes are controlled by melanin — that same chemical which gives Blacks their superior physical and mental abilities.

Four: Some scientists have revealed that most whites are unable to produce melanin because their pineal glands are often calcified or non-functioning. Pineal calcification rates with Africans are five to 15 percent, Asians 15 to 25 percent and Europeans 60 to 80 percent. This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences between blacks and whites.

Five: Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.

 

Edited by lucklucky
Posted
11 hours ago, glenn239 said:

Twitter will not punish Biden because Biden will now has the ability to declare their behaviour contrary to national security, not because the companies that just shit all over the authority and prestige of the Executive Office will suddenly become constitutional patriots.  Trump is on his way out, so Twitter no longer fears Trump bringing down the hammer on them in the form of an executive order.  

I don't think you understand what is the ideology of Twitter. Even if this was a proposal from a Senator or Congressman Biden this would not be censored by Twitter.

Posted

Old and busted : Trump thinks everyone in his administration is a traitor. 
New Hotness : Biden and the Democrats think everyone on the right is a traitor. 

Posted
5 hours ago, rmgill said:
Okay, place your bets. Which country is the US going to invade and have an endless war against in order to "bring us together against a common enemy"? Name the country and the kickoff date and then we can refer back to this to see who wins. (and someone will inevitably win).

Back into A’stan, big time?

By summer?

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Eastes said:

Back into A’stan, big time?

By summer?

Bolton, and Mattis were very keen in attacking Iran.

Michael Yon, however, says he is working to prevent a civil war that he sees a pretty much inevitable in the first half of this year.

 

Quote

Those who have followed my work for years -- and especially in 2020 -- are not surprised at all at the turn of events.

My focus now is to help avert full-scale civil war by this Spring and Summer. And to be sure, though I am a cup-half-full man, I think it's too late for my efforts. I am still doing CPR on that hope there is still a glimmer that calmer heads will prevail. And this still is possible. Just does not seem probable, nor does it fit the fact-pattern.

(...)

As you know, cancel culture is increasing. At this rate, those doing the canceling so far will start getting canceled. There is always someone with a higher switch. War itself is the ultimate cancel culture. Sickening to imagine where this leads.

(...)

Many of the people making these tech cancel decisions are not thinking it through. There is always someone farther up the food chain, or lower down the food chain, who also can cancel. You can see angry people chatting online about this. They are studying infrastructure. Incredibly dangerous for us all.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Eastes said:

Back into A’stan, big time?

By summer?

Perhaps Colombia vs Venezuela?

Posted
58 minutes ago, sunday said:

Bolton, and Mattis were very keen in attacking Iran.

Michael Yon, however, says he is working to prevent a civil war that he sees a pretty much inevitable in the first half of this year.

 

 

Unfortunately the US right thinks scalar but they only act binary: be quiet while taking harassment from the left, or full violence.

The first mistake they usually make is to not taking account of "terrain" : media, industry, technology, sustainability of their actions, how to get support from independents . For people that praise weapons they seem pretty clueless about what is a conflict.

Instead the left thinks binary , but act scalar so they have a full spectrum of actions. They turned many corporations to the left without a single shot.

The left is also always on, while the right wants only to be left alone. You might want nothing with the Left but the Left wants always "care" about you.

 

 

 

 

Posted
47 minutes ago, sunday said:

Bolton, and Mattis were very keen in attacking Iran.

Biden admin will never attack Iran as long as they are the primary opponent of Israel's existence. In fact, since the Trump administration has created some comity between Israel and the Sunni Arab world, the only friend that the Dems have left in the ME is Iran.

The wild card is, of course, China. If China demands the US go abroad to knock over some pawn to clear a path for the PRC to make a bigger power move, will Biden/Harris do it?

On a related note, former Senator Barbara Boxer first registered as a foreign agent for a Chinese surveillance firm, then de-registered. Oops.

Posted

I don't think Biden/Harris are that close to China, but they have a similar techno-Fascist take on state power. I am seeing a Munich agreement - now willing - about Taiwan.  Nevertheless they would have to destroy the last 20 years of opposing China by US military specially the Navy. So if you see big changes in Navy admirals and top people that might be a sign that the Freedom of Navigation actions in Taiwan Strait and elsewhere are stopped and Taiwan was told to submit.

Posted
9 hours ago, lucklucky said:

I don't think Biden/Harris are that close to China, but they have a similar techno-Fascist take on state power. I am seeing a Munich agreement - now willing - about Taiwan.  Nevertheless they would have to destroy the last 20 years of opposing China by US military specially the Navy. So if you see big changes in Navy admirals and top people that might be a sign that the Freedom of Navigation actions in Taiwan Strait and elsewhere are stopped and Taiwan was told to submit.

Keep in mind that the PRC has been coopting a broad spectrum of American leaders for years. It seems entirely possible, perhaps likely, to me that the PRC has hi-res video of Hunter Biden getting freaky with a 13-year-old girl in a hotel room somewhere (including hard drug usage, of course). When Biden gets a msg from the Chinese diplos that he needs to help the PRC execute a coup in some Africastan to give the PRC dominance in production of some strategic metal or whatever, what's he gonna do?

 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Ivanhoe said:

Keep in mind that the PRC has been coopting a broad spectrum of American leaders for years. It seems entirely possible, perhaps likely, to me that the PRC has hi-res video of Hunter Biden getting freaky with a 13-year-old girl in a hotel room somewhere (including hard drug usage, of course). When Biden gets a msg from the Chinese diplos that he needs to help the PRC execute a coup in some Africastan to give the PRC dominance in production of some strategic metal or whatever, what's he gonna do?

 

The PRC doesn't need that already, they don't need coups to get their "boys" in place, they use the AIIB and leave the locals with their politics, without interfering. They need to have a hand in the US President pocket in case he decides to screw with the flow of greenbacks going to China, like Trump did. They don't care what the US does outside of the US, unless they do it in "China" as they understand it (ie 9 dash line, Taiwan...)

Edited by RETAC21
Posted

https://babylonbee.com/news/biden-releases-skin-color-chart-to-determine-who-gets-federal-aid

article-7747-1.jpg

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, lucklucky said:

I don't think you understand what is the ideology of Twitter. Even if this was a proposal from a Senator or Congressman Biden this would not be censored by Twitter.

Since at least Obama's presidency, (arguably, Reagan's), there has been an assault on the strongest form of democratic power in the United States - the office of the president.  It comes from all sides and in all forms, but recently, Nancy wants some of the power of POTUS for the Speaker of the House.   That's why she talks about the 25th and to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, (both were major constitutional overreaches).  Twitter and Facebook nibble away at POTUS one day, one tweet, at a time.  Suddenly, a president is lower in command structure than the head of Facebook.  You're thinking that it was about Trump.  I'm thinking that Trump was a stalking horse and it's really about the annoying fact that voters have this one last vestige of real democratic power.

Biden is old school and, I think, no fool.  He must be perfectly aware that these forces that railed against Trump can and will turn on him if he moves even slightly out of the lane they've chaulked for him.   But I will do what I've always done - back the sitting president.  And if Twitter steps even slightly out of line with Biden, like they did with Trump, I hope he levels them with an executive order of such stark harshness that they will not dare but to comply to the letter.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by glenn239
Posted

I think that Pelosi wants power for herself, not for the position of the speaker. If she was President she'd want it there too. 

What's odd in all of this is the power that congress has abdicated to the executive branch by way of executive order and wiggle room within the USCs for CFRs to be passed. That's where they'd be rightly working to regain control from the executive branch. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...