Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted (edited)

He finally got the price needed for him to retire from the presidential race.  Biden is out.

A letter from President Biden

 

Edited by DKTanker
Posted

That wasn't Joe Biden writing. He didn't call Trump a fascist or threat to democracy even once in that letter.

On a serious note, connecting the dots on the criminally inadequate USSS protection provided to Trump leads all the way to Jill. Jill surely has been enjoying the fruits of Hunter's and Joe's influence peddling, but obviously she is not up for being grilled by House Republicans concerning the Secret Service.

 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Stefan Fredriksson said:

This is as close to admitting trying to kill Trump as we will ever get.

Sad, but ever so true.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Markus Becker said:

"NBC says he has endorsed Harris for the nomination."

Isn't she even more unpopular than he used to be before the debate debacle? 

 

With the current disarray in the DNC, the Powers That Be may have decided to sacrifice Harris while the Party resets and starts working on the talent pool for 2028.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Markus Becker said:

"NBC says he has endorsed Harris for the nomination."

Isn't she even more unpopular than he used to be before the debate debacle?

She might have been before Biden's tumble after the debate but current polling shows her doing better.  Whether it will stay high is another question.

If you're a D it's unfortunate she's the VP (and overwhelming favorite to become the nominee).  There's been a lot of talk of Sen. Kelly from here in AZ being a possibility.  He would have been a particularly difficult candidate to defeat.

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Ivanhoe said:

With the current disarray in the DNC, the Powers That Be may have decided to sacrifice Harris while the Party resets and starts working on the talent pool for 2028.

If they were smart they'd woo Tulsi back into the fold.  I can think of no other Democrat or one time Democrat that enjoys wider appeal.

Edited by DKTanker
Posted
1 hour ago, Ivanhoe said:

That wasn't Joe Biden writing. He didn't call Trump a fascist or threat to democracy even once in that letter.

On a serious note, connecting the dots on the criminally inadequate USSS protection provided to Trump leads all the way to Jill. Jill surely has been enjoying the fruits of Hunter's and Joe's influence peddling, but obviously she is not up for being grilled by House Republicans concerning the Secret Service.

 

Considering his proven antipathy for the USSS, I think a far more likely candidate is Major.

Posted

Watch for the fight to keep the Kackling Kammi off the ticket and someone else go in.  Watch the Annointed One aka Barak Hussein Obama and see who he annoints.  

Posted

Yeah, I don't see Harris surviving opposition from the Clinton/Obama camp.

 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Ivanhoe said:

Yeah, I don't see Harris surviving opposition from the Clinton/Obama camp.

The Clintons have already endorsed her.

Posted

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/ludicrous-donors-leave-call-harris-frustrated-annoyed-rcna162877
 

Quote

 

PROVINCETOWN, Mass. — A call Friday featuring Vice President Kamala Harris and about 300 major Democratic donors left many who dialed in frustrated, with one donor declaring it “ludicrous” shortly before it ended, according to two sources familiar with the call.

One person on the call referred to it as “mismanaged” and “rushed.” They added expectations had not been managed well and some participants left feeling admonished.

 

.

Quote

One source said before Harris joined there seemed to be an effort to stall, which they said is normal for events with high-ranking officials. But what angered many donors, this source said, was that during the wait — which was about 20 minutes — donors were “admonished.” Participants of the call were told they needed to “lock in and get behind” Biden and to not pursue efforts to push out the president.

.

Quote

“These are donors who are not used to getting admonished and told what to do,” the source said.

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, bfng3569 said:

my money's on Gavin Loathesome

Harris for sure. It would problematic financially and politically otherwise, and quite honestly no one wants to have to create a platform,  a ground game, and all the other trappings of a campaign with only three months left. Kamala can just assume control all the established infrastructure. She will be selected with no opposition. She isn’t a strong candidate, but given her connections to the already established campaign, she is still the strongest bet.

Had Biden never run there would have been a half dozen or more more popular people to run, but it’s too late now.

Edited by Josh
Posted
3 hours ago, Murph said:

Watch for the fight to keep the Kackling Kammi off the ticket and someone else go in.  Watch the Annointed One aka Barak Hussein Obama and see who he annoints.  

No. The party with an incredibly weak anointed candidate is the GOP, and while the Dems corrected their mistake, there is no hope of Republicans correcting theirs. If the GOP loses, it will be because of its slavish commitment to an aging cult leader. And if it loses the presidency, I suspect it loses everywhere else as well.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ivanhoe said:

Yeah, I don't see Harris surviving opposition from the Clinton/Obama camp.

 

No. There will be no opposition inside 48 hours.

Edited by Josh
Posted
8 minutes ago, Josh said:

Harris for sure. It would problematic financially...

No easier for Harris than anyone else if you're thinking about Joe's campaign warchest.  Reason, Biden was never officially a candidate and Harris was never officially his running mate.  Therefore Harris has no more claim to that money than do you.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, DKTanker said:

No easier for Harris than anyone else if you're thinking about Joe's campaign warchest.  Reason, Biden was never officially a candidate and Harris was never officially his running mate.  Therefore Harris has no more claim to that money than do you.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Edited by Josh
Posted
6 minutes ago, Josh said:

No. The party with an incredibly weak anointed candidate is the GOP, and while the Dems corrected their mistake, there is no hope of Republicans correcting theirs. If the GOP loses, it will be because of its slavish commitment to an aging cult leader. And if it loses the presidency, I suspect it loses everywhere else as well.

Isn't that ironic, the dems, champions of "democracy" used thugery to oust their duly elected (democracy) nominee so they can install their own preferred candidate.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, DKTanker said:

Isn't that ironic, the dems, champions of "democracy" used thugery to oust their duly elected (democracy) nominee so they can install their own preferred candidate.

The candidate gave in to political pressure. How many Republicans have been canceled by Donald Trump again? Does he not brag about politically ending anyone who opposes him?

Edited by Josh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...