Jump to content

Haenel wins German G36 replacement award


Dawes

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well the complaint isn't about the magazine, but an actual HK patent from 2007 on a bolt system enabling safe function after immersion in water. Or more specifically, one of the inventors named in the patent is Robert Hirt, co-developer of the HK 416, who went on to design the CAR816 for Caracal, Haenel's mother company. There is already a lawsuit on the issue, though formally against use of the system in the MK556's semi-auto CR223 version which has been procured by police in several German states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Haenel has been excluded from the program on grounds of patent infringement, allegedly both over HK's bolt design and Magpul's magazine. Whether that means the contract will go to one of HK's two entries or the whole process will be started over is not clear yet. Of course now Haenel is likely to sue as they commissioned their own expertise to prove they infringed on nuthin'.

I'm just glad that unlike larger bits like the spiraling procurement of new heavy transport helicopters or fleet oilers the whole circus is largely inconsequential, since there remain few complaints about the current G 36 from actual users despite the original excitement over hot accuracy which led to the replacement process. Some even suggest the MoD is quite happy to delay this as it gives them some additional time to watch developments in the rifle sector which might improve the sense of replacement.

ETA: Official statement says the order will go to the HK 416.

Edited by BansheeOne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2021 at 6:45 AM, Simon Tan said:

Even if they infringed on a patent, they can just pay HK a royalty. 

Still, with the knowledge the German government can not give them the contract unless HK would licence the design to Haenel. I personally expect that the tender will be dropped and restarted after new requirements are set and HK will probably get a limited order for more and improved G36s. It would be wise to draw this out unless NATO decides on a new round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, seahawk said:

Still, with the knowledge the German government can not give them the contract unless HK would licence the design to Haenel.

In the USA that could be forced under eminent domain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/4/2021 at 4:46 PM, Simon Tan said:

HK is used to fixed tenders......

I'm guessing here, but I assume you mean fixed as in " the fix is in" as opposed to "fixed price".

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

And H&K potentially getting sued by Magpul. This is funnier than a circus, keep it going for at least 5 more years. :D

https://soldat-und-technik.de/2021/04/bewaffnung/26773/system-sturmgewehr-bundeswehr-neue-unklarheiten-bei-patentrechten/

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say it again, good thing this is no really pressing issue, unlike the procurement cockups for much more urgently needed bigger systems. The article notes at the end that many G 36s are worn out and only part has interfaces to accept modern optics and night vision equipment, but can be replaced/adapted bit by bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BansheeOne said:

The article notes at the end that many G 36s are worn out and only part has interfaces to accept modern optics and night vision equipment,[b] but can be replaced/adapted bit by bit.[/b]

That would be....simple and inexpensive. No way it's going to happen unless the CDU finds itself in the opposition after the fall. Otherwise the G36 is out because keeping it would show the politicians made a mistake. 

Now the consequences of that new lawsuit. Do we have some G3 in storage? I hear the modernized Swedish ones are rather nice. 🤓

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recapitalizing G36 is pointless. Haenael should receive the award with half the contract given to Mauser for production and the German government will bear any damned royalties. Unbelievable how incompetent Germans are to just buy a stupid rifle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of the status of Krupp as *The* Reich's Armory between the end of the Franco-Prussian War and the end of WWI. Krupp considered themselves free to sell quick firing cannon to the Imperial Chinese, cannon that was used against German forces during the Boxer Rebellion, but they raised a monumental stink when rumors of the Heer buying from Vickers became known.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2021 at 4:02 PM, Simon Tan said:

Recapitalizing G36 is pointless. Haenael should receive the award with half the contract given to Mauser for production and the German government will bear any damned royalties. Unbelievable how incompetent Germans are to just buy a stupid rifle. 

You only think this because it's been a while since the UK bought a new one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2021 at 5:02 PM, Simon Tan said:

Recapitalizing G36 is pointless. Haenael should receive the award with half the contract given to Mauser for production and the German government will bear any damned royalties. Unbelievable how incompetent Germans are to just buy a stupid rifle. 

The gun seems sound. New production with a good barrel and pic rail instead of a fixed optic and you are done. Or are the new rifles even better? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not. There are quite a lot of aspects of G36 that are far from ideal. The HK433 and even 416 are architecturally and technically much better. Bizzaroland German thinking ignores the reality of a really quite resurgent German small arms industry which is commercially and export driven. It really shows how corrupt the civil service and politicos are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Federal Antitrust Office has rejected a Haenel complaint against the order being handed over to HK. However, the decision is not based upon the whole patent infringement thing, but the fact that a recalculation of the price offered by Haenel meant it was now economically inferior to HK's. Which of course poses the question just when this was recognized; it was certainly never mentioned before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...