Culture Wars

[R011]

49 minutes ago, Ivanhoe said:

Affirmative Action has empowered libs to spackle over the effects of policy on crime, education, and personal values. 

 

Exactly.

[rmgill]

23 hours ago, R011 said:

How is improving familiy life and education in the inner cities anti-White?

Rejecting people who are more qualified but white so as to raise the diversity quotient is. 

[rmgill]

 

[JWB]

 

[Rick]

5 hours ago, JWB said:

 

This reads like "journalism" is creating news instead of reporting news. 

[sunday]

1 hour ago, Rick said:

This reads like "journalism" is creating news instead of reporting news. 

In the best tradition of William Randolph "You furnish the pictures. I'll furnish the war." Hearst

[Murph]

Says it all:

[R011]

1 hour ago, Murph said:

Says it all:

Ukraine biolabs?  They would be the bioweapons facilities that only existed in the pages of Pravda, right?

[sunday]

https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3057517/fact-sheet-on-wmd-threat-reduction-efforts-with-ukraine-russia-and-other-former/

Quote

The United States has also worked collaboratively to improve Ukraine’s biological safety, security, and disease surveillance for both human and animal health, providing support to 46 peaceful Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and disease diagnostic sites over the last two decades.  The collaborative programs have focused on improving public health and agricultural safety measures at the nexus of nonproliferation. 

Then, one would consider what Victoria Nuland stated about Ukrainian biological research facilities, facilities that would be a concern were they to fall in Russian hands:

 

[Colin]

Mind you any agricultural country would have "biolabs" as they need to test for animal diseases and viruses and make antidotes and vaccines.

[sunday]

Yes.

[rmgill]

So by questioning biolabs, one reframes them as ‘bioweapons facilities’ to discount? 
 

The CDC’s hot cells are biolabs, not bio weapons facilities. Having a war in Atlanta would be a problem regardless. 

[sunday]

Some facilities could be used of different manners.

[R011]

14 minutes ago, rmgill said:

So by questioning biolabs, one reframes them as ‘bioweapons facilities’ to discount? 

Seeing as the claim about Ukrainian biolabs was that they were BW facilities, yes 

Note "Journalists" have never claimed the labs didn't exist.

Edited July 21, 2023 by R011

[rmgill]

 

[rmgill]

2 minutes ago, R011 said:

Seeing as the claim about Ukrainian biolabs was that they were BW facilities, yes 

The one above you are disputing says biolabs. If it was the Wuhan lab in the middle of a warzone, that’d be fine? The US CDC’s labs in Atlanta?

[R011]

So who's claims about the Ukrainian labs was correct?  The "Journalists"who said they were just normal labs or the "Conspiracy Theorists" who said they were BW labs?

[sunday]

Knowing journos, then...

[rmgill]

How is it amateurs with no degrees in journalism and not invited to all the right parties aren’t always wrong as the Journalist claim? 

[rmgill]

55 minutes ago, R011 said:

So who's claims about the Ukrainian labs was correct?  The "Journalists"who said they were just normal labs or the "Conspiracy Theorists" who said they were BW labs?

Who will actually substantiate what is there in the middle of a war where we have agents of the Us government clamping down on stories with buy in from big tech? 

Who is credible? KJP? 

 

[Murph]

3 hours ago, R011 said:

Ukraine biolabs?  They would be the bioweapons facilities that only existed in the pages of Pravda, right?

So what you are saying is that you can only find one thing that might, theoretically might be not correct, and so therefore everything else on this list is true?  

[R011]

4 minutes ago, Murph said:

So what you are saying is that you can only find one thing that might, theoretically might be not correct, and so therefore everything else on this list is true?  

I'm saying that this was one thing on that list I could call bullshit on without bothering to do much work at the time.  As for the rest, the Covid claims by the Conspircay Theoirst side are either overblown or insufficiently proven.  The Epstien sex Island one I can only assume means the claims that Clinton was banging underage hookers or that Epstein was murdered which are possible, but for which there is no proof and little evidence.  I don't know what the child trafficking difference between "Journalists" and "Theorists" is supposed to be unless it's the ridiculous QAnon crap about that DC pizza parlour.  Hunter, Russiagate, and Steele, yes, the journalists were wrong.

[R011]

36 minutes ago, rmgill said:

Who will actually substantiate what is there in the middle of a war where we have agents of the Us government clamping down on stories with buy in from big tech? 

Who is credible? KJP? 

 

So you admit that the Russian claim about Ukrainian biolabs repested by the so-called "Theorirists" is unsubstantiated.  They made the claim, so they need to provide evidence to prove it.  That you clealry find Putin and cronies at all credible is interesting.

[Murph]

The list looks pretty solid to me, if it comes from an MSM journalist, I know they are lying through their teeth.  

 

[Murph]

We are starting to run the scoundrels out: