Ivanhoe Posted October 11 Posted October 11 https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/pfizer-left-covid-19-vaccine-data-out-submissions-fda-documents-show Quote Data on how parts of a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine spread in the bodies of mice were withheld from regulatory submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to a new comparison of those submissions and similar documents sent to Japanese regulators. Byram Bridle, who has a PhD in immunology and is an associate professor of immunology and virology at the University of Guelph in Canada, authored the comparison. It was dated Aug. 13 and released on Oct. 4 by Dr. Robert Malone, a vaccine adviser to the U.S. government. “The findings of this report raise serious questions about the integrity of the health regulatory process during the declared COVID-19 pandemic,” Bridle said in his conclusions. During a September meeting, under questioning by Malone, a Pfizer representative said that its studies of the spread of vaccine elements, known as biodistribution, were done in consultation with the FDA. “Pfizer does not have a further comment other than we did our work in close consultation with the FDA on all our of biodistribution studies that were approved for our licensed product,” the representative said. Quote Pfizer and Moderna did not carry out human biodistribution studies before the FDA cleared their messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines in late 2020. They tested the spread of mRNA in animals. Pfizer and BioNTech tested a surrogate product containing modified RNA, or modRNA, and luciferase, a bioluminescent enzyme found in fireflies, in mice and rats. The distribution was tracked over nine days, according to documents released by the FDA in 2022 under court order. “Highest signal was detected at the first time points after immunization at the injection site and the signal declined slowly over time until day 9,” the BioNTech report on the mice study stated. The testing “showed limited drainage to the liver,” but no signal was detected 48 hours after immunization, according to the report. Quote “The image in the FDA’s version of the common technical document appears to be a version of the image from the Japanese document that was manipulated in numerous ways, potentially to discourage discovery that they are one and the same,” Bridle stated. “It was then cropped to hide clear evidence of systemic biodistribution of the modRNA vaccine.” All of the images sent to American and Japanese regulators cut off at least 25 percent of the mice bodies, including their heads, which prevented any conclusions being made about potential spread to the brain, Bridle said. IANAL, but I think it could be argued in court that the persistent dishonesty from the mRNA peddlers essentially abrogates any civil liability protections given to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J.
nitflegal Posted October 11 Posted October 11 I'll clarify that I haven't looked at the published data but the use of luciferase as a surrogate for IVIS imaging has been a standard for biodistribution studies for years now. It came about because it lets you do imaging to track the marker as a timecourse for an individual animal so you can compare the data within an animal across time. Previous to this you euthanized an animal at each time point, harvested the appropriate tissues at assay, ground them down and then ran your assays. That approach had multiple problems because if each animal/patient has different pharmacokinetics (and they do) you are comparing individual findings in a grouped format and hoping that they are indicative of what happened in a single patient. Which they broadly are but you mask the rarer indications. Basically, if 5% of your test subjects have a weird "this drug shouldn't go to the spinal cord and cause neural degeneration but it did" you'll likely miss it. Luciferase and IVIS imaging are much more sensitive, which is why they have become the standard so the suggestion that they should have tracked the unmodified vaccine displays a misunderstanding of current development methods. In all likelihood, while these studies showed the mRNA in those tissues had they used older approaches (timepointed necropsies) they wouldn't have been evident. Basically, if you administer any substance to the body that isn't into the brain or spinal cord behind the BBB it gets distributed by going into the blood stream and being carried to the target organs BUT it also is diffused into the total blood supply so it goes to every organ until it either all gets taken into the target tissues or processed via the kidneys (typically). Basically every vaccine and every drug not directly administered into the CNS gets carried by the blood to every tissue and organ (because they all have blood vessels) until they either stick at their final organ/tissue or are processed as waste via the kidneys and liver. Which is why in that first 1-7 days every drug spikes in the kidney and liver; the excess drug is being filtered out by those organs. That stated, think of the imaging as shining a light into a parking lot to see how many and where the side view mirrors are; you're going to get a ton of reflections from other objects that you have to filter out. That could be why in the paper the images have been modified, they use filters to eliminate the scattered returns to allow digital analysis of the tissues (our algorithms aren't smart enough to not count the scatter and present them as part of the total). Additionally, the skulls return a bunch of reflection and the imaging doesn't penetrate bone well so you use more 3PM there instead. I'd also point out that the call to do longer studies is the right call and part of the normal drug development process BUT wouldn't have happened under EUA protocols. The whole point of the EUA protocol is to strip out the testing that is nice to very nice to have and leave the barest essentials; the study in question would have been a 9 month minimum along with 1-3 months for data analysis (which is mostly unautomated so it's brute force analysis by a limited number of humans so difficult to accelerate past that, usually it's a 6 month post study analysis) which would have pushed the period out by another year. That's not happening in an EUA pandemic response. Please don't take any of that as a defense of the pandemic response, it's not. I have and will continue to argue that because of the novel platform and the obvious clustering of mortality at the elderly or seriously health compromised the vaccines should never have been mandatory for any populations and should have been warned against or outright prohibited for anyone under 50 until a second wave of testing was conducted and should never have been given to people under 30. We knew that from the data by the end of 2020 and what was done in 2021-2023 was flat out evil and people need to go to jail for the rest of their lives.
Ivanhoe Posted October 22 Posted October 22 https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-10-covid-vitamin-d-fell-pandemic.html Quote Routine data from laboratories reveal a decline in vitamin D levels during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in older women and urban dwellers. The COVID-19 pandemic had effects on human health well beyond the infections themselves. A research team led by LMU epidemiologist Professor Eva Grill has demonstrated for the first time at the population level that vitamin D levels were significantly lower during the pandemic than before. Given the interaction between vitamin D and the immune system, kinda important. I found out I had low D levels from a CBC right in mid-March of 2020, perfect timing to get my levels up. Quote 292,187 patients from all over Bavaria Dunno what sort of lockdown Bavaria had, but here in the States lockdowns were more severe in urban climes. In my little cowtown, the county commissioner bankrupted a lot of small independent businesses* but at least we could travel freely, get outside and exercise, and all that. As for elderly women, given the panic porn on the evening news, maybe those elderly women didn't want to end up in intensive care without meaningful treatment. * Big box stores and supermarkets were un-oppressed. I figure the cause and effect was what Old Tanker would have called lagniappe.
Ivanhoe Posted October 26 Posted October 26 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12465339/ Quote The risks for overall cancer were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and data were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs of thyroid (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.206–1.514), gastric (HR, 1.335; 95% CI, 1.130–1.576), colorectal (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.122–1.468), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.254–1.874), breast (HR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.069–1.340), and prostate (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.348–2.111) cancers significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination. In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers. Large sample size, but only a retrospective study. Pretty obviously a safety signal.
Der Zeitgeist Posted October 29 Author Posted October 29 Noooooo, they're killing him with the vaccine!!11!1
Tim the Tank Nut Posted October 29 Posted October 29 look what has crawled out of the woodwork... As harmful to some as the vaccination has been it is no match for the might of TRUMP!
17thfabn Posted October 29 Posted October 29 5 hours ago, Ivanhoe said: The mighty placebo. Often 50 % effective.
Ivanhoe Posted October 30 Posted October 30 TL;DR bad people did bad things and caused irreparable harms to innocent victims;
Ivanhoe Posted November 2 Posted November 2 Blood vessel stiffening in women possibly accelerated by COVID infection.
Ivanhoe Posted November 2 Posted November 2 https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/46/39/3905/8236450
Ivanhoe Posted November 5 Posted November 5 https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/prominent-virologist-warned-intelligence-community-covid-19-could-have-leaked-from-wuhan-lab-then-he-met-with-fauci-and-changed-his-tune/ Quote A prominent U.S. virologist who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology before the COVID-19 pandemic privately informed the U.S. intelligence community in January 2020 that the Chinese lab may be responsible for the outbreak. But in his public remarks to congressional staffers one month later—and after meeting with former White House health adviser Anthony Fauci—the researcher stayed mum about the Wuhan lab and lent credence to the discredited wet market theory. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill virologist Dr. Ralph Baric warned the Office of the Director of National Intelligence during a closed-door presentation with the agency’s Biological Sciences Experts Group on or around Jan. 29, 2020, that the Wuhan lab, which was conducting risky gain-of-function experiments on bat viruses similar to the one that causes COVID-19, may have accidentally released the virus into the human population. Baric’s presentation, which the Washington Free Beacon obtained from a whistleblower, went beyond mere speculation: Considered one of the world’s foremost experts on coronaviruses, Baric experimented with coronaviruses in 2015 with the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s top researcher, Shi Zhengli. Later, in early 2024, he testified to House investigators that he had privately warned Shi that her lab lacked sufficient biosafety protections and that he always believed a lab leak origin was possible. Quote Baric’s private presentation to the intelligence community in January 2020, which was first disclosed Friday by Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.), was almost identical to a public briefing he delivered to the Congressional Biomedical Research Caucus the following month on Feb. 26, 2020. For the public presentation, however, Baric removed the slides referencing the possibility that the virus could have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Paul should have been publicly commenting on Baric's change of tune. Quote Sen. Joni Ernst (R., Iowa) called on Baric to testify publicly before Congress to clarify why he changed his tune and stayed silent on the lab leak theory. "Americans who simply dared to ask if COVID was from a lab were labeled conspiracy theorists, and yet we now learn that evidence was shown to the intelligence community supporting that theory before our country was locked down," Ernst told the Free Beacon. "In the face of this new timeline, I won’t leave any stone unturned until we get to the bottom of COVID’s true origins. This includes unmasking the role of Dr. Ralph Baric, who was directly involved in batty Wuhan research, and determining why he pushed the wet market story and stayed silent on the lab leak possibility, even while presenting the opposite in closed-door briefings."
Ivanhoe Posted November 6 Posted November 6 https://brownstone.org/articles/the-third-rail-covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer/ Quote As my colleague, internationally renowned cancer biologist Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, and I articulated in the September ACIP meeting on Covid vaccines, nearly 50 publications have reported a temporal association between Covid-19 mRNA vaccination and the onset of cancer. Epidemiological studies (one from Italy and one from South Korea) have also described increased cancer incidence among Covid-vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated groups (albeit with caveats). These reports are mounting and it’s time we acknowledge that something meaningful may be occurring rather than dismissing them outright; this latter response seems to be the dominant reaction in academia, the media, and by our regulatory agencies. As they say in the old country, read the whole thing.
Ivanhoe Posted November 8 Posted November 8 https://vejonhealth.com/covid-19/the-prophet-we-ignored-why-sepsis-diagnoses-dropped-50-but-deaths-keep-rising/ Quote In March 2021, when vaccination campaigns were accelerating globally, Vanden Bossche predicted that mass vaccination during an active pandemic would create unprecedented immune pressure, driving viral evolution at speeds never before recorded. The scientific establishment dismissed this as anti-vaccine fear-mongering. The outcome? The fastest variant evolution in recorded viral history. From Delta through Omicron’s multiple subvariants to the current landscape where major variants now emerge on timescales measured in weeks rather than years, SARS-CoV-2 has rewritten the rules of viral adaptation. Few objective scientists would now dispute that Vanden Bossche was correct about the mechanism, even if they quibble with his timeline projections. Quote IgG4 dominance represents a fundamental shift in immune strategy. These tolerance antibodies—the same type generated during allergy desensitization therapy—signal the immune system to coexist with antigens rather than eliminate them. Research published in 2022 showed mRNA vaccination generates IgG4 levels 45 times higher than natural infection alone. The body has been taught to tolerate the threat. T-cell evasion is no longer theoretical. Vanden Bossche’s analysis shows immune pressure now targeting the nucleocapsid proteins—internal structural components previously considered stable. When these proteins mutate sufficiently, T-cells lose their ability to recognize infected cells. T helper cells coordinate the entire immune response; when they’re evaded, antibodies become ineffective regardless of their levels. Interferon suppression distinguishes COVID from other respiratory viruses. Where influenza triggers strong interferon responses that block secondary infections, COVID suppresses this first-line defense, opening the door to multiple simultaneous infections. Each infection compounds damage, weakening the response to the next. Quote When a T-cell-evasive variant emerges into this landscape—patients with suppressed interferon responses, tolerance antibodies, and T-cells that can’t recognize infected cells—the result may resemble the clinical observations described earlier: silent viral replication until sudden brainstem or multi-organ failure. Vanden Bossche has compared this to a Category 5 hurricane. No matter the preparation level, response capacity can’t keep up when the storm hits at full force. The cost of a false alarm is measured in wasted resources. The cost of being unprepared is measured in lives. Quote The window for preparation is narrowing. The trajectory is clear: variants accelerating toward a threshold where immune evasion becomes complete, where silent replication proceeds unchecked, where presentation is so atypical that standard protocols fail. Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst. The storm isn’t coming. It’s already here. Medicine is just looking at the wrong radar. Geez.
sunday Posted November 10 Posted November 10 On dancing nurses videos and some worrying aspects. https://substack.com/home/post/p-175746469 Quote Prologue Dancing nurses were never about the morale of healthcare workers or stress relief. They were a test, a sorting mechanism, revealing who would accept the contradictions and who would resist them. These videos on TikTok, which appeared simultaneously across all continents while governments declared medical emergencies, represented something unprecedented in the history of propaganda: the authorities showed that they could make populations accept two mutually exclusive realities at the same time. (...)
Ivanhoe Posted November 10 Posted November 10 As for dancing, this link came up in a Reddit discussion of the Case of the Dancing Nurses; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dancing_plague_of_1518 Blamed on ergotism (but then, what isn't blamed on ergotism, really?). Same Reddit thread featured some apparently British common folk quite unhappy with the NHS (statements such as "cancer patients told to eff off"). But wait! There's more! https://jacquideevoy.substack.com/p/danse-macabre-an-update-on-the-dancing Quote The most commonly used excuse was along the lines of “well, they have to let off steam somehow,” but the general response was a stunned silence: how could 12-hour-shift nurses find time to rehearse amidst the chaos of a pandemic? Quote The polished production of many of these videos raised several red flags. Camera angles suggested tripods or crews, not shaky iPhone footage. Moves veered from playful skips to suggestive grinding and hip gyrations. "This is one aspect of the Covid fraud that I haven't managed to nail down," says Dr. Tony Royle, PhD in a recent X thread. "I can't believe that genuine doctors and nurses would have behaved like this... so who were the actors?" In response to the doctor’s comment, former performer Caroline Sergeant states: “Having once been a professional actress/singer/dancer, I agree… You would get a brief via agent/casting site saying they wanted e.g. actors who could dance but were not professional (to look authentic). That’s what it looks like." Government lockdown exemptions for "high-end TV and film production" lent credence to theories of hired talent. A.I. detection tools on screenshots came up inconclusive, but the masks - blue surgical ones obscuring faces - were decried as "essential" for anonymity. Quote To quantify the unease, researchers in Milwaukee conducted a systematic content analysis of 52 TikTok videos from March to December 2020, using search terms like "dancing nurse" and hashtags such as #dancingnurse. Each video averaged 1.51 million views, amassing millions of impressions during peak pandemic fear. Yet the study uncovered 356 violations of core professional standards, including the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics, ANA social networking principles, and National Council of State Boards of Nursing guidelines. Seventy-seven percent (40 videos) featured choreographed dances, far beyond spontaneous fun. Forty-six percent (24 videos) included twerking, while 6% (3 videos) escalated to pelvic thrusts and gyrations - moves deemed "inappropriate and even sexually suggestive." Data on likes, followers and concurrent Covid death rates underscored the irony: as US mortality climbed, these clips racked up engagement, potentially trivialising the toll. The study's discussion is damning and concluded such content "could damage the professional image of nurses and downplay the seriousness of the current pandemic." It calls for urgent education on social media policies, emphasising that nurses must weigh how posts reflect on their duty to patients and the public. https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/nurs/282/ The following paper provides a detailed analysis of the psychological manipulations; https://www.academia.edu/144495780/Dancing_nurses_psychological_warfare_academic Quote The concept of trauma bonding—emotional attachment to an abuser through cycles of mistreatment and intermittent relief—applies to the dancing nurse phenomenon . Videos provided brief emotional relief (cheerful music, smiling faces) embedded within ongoing fear messaging, creating attachment to authorities providing both trauma and relief . Meerloo's (1956) analysis of menticide (mind murder) described how totalitarian systems alternate between terror and promise to break independent thinking[attached_file:1]. Dancing nurse videos functioned analogously: moments of levity that paradoxically deepened acceptance of contradictory authoritative claims. and Quote Official explanations characterized dancing nurse videos as spontaneous morale-boosting initiatives by stressed healthcare workers [25] [35] . Creston Valley Hospital stated: "At a time when the pressures of COVID-19 weigh heavily on all staff working in our health-care sites, this was a fun chance for the team to come together and have some laughs" [20] . Supporting evidence includes: Healthcare worker testimony about stress relief [19] [25] Participation in broader Jerusalema Challenge unrelated to pandemic [22] Professional statements supporting wellness initiatives [35] However, this interpretation struggles to explain: Professional production quality requiring institutional resources [1] [2] 356 ethical code violations documented by nursing researchers [1] [2] Temporal and geographic coordination patterns[attached_file:1] TikTok financial incentives coinciding with video proliferation [24] If you're ever stuck at home with the flu or whatever and want to dive in, this paper has 75 citations to keep you busy. Note that you'll need to create a free account on academia.edu to download the PDF.
Ivanhoe Posted November 10 Posted November 10 In performing a google search for commentary on the dancing nurses thing, this popped up; https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8249241/Nearly-40-000-hospital-beds-lie-operations-treatments-cancelled.html Quote Private hospitals are empty and up to 40,000 NHS beds lie unused amid mounting fury over the handling of non coronavirus treatment as thousands of operations are cancelled and cancers go undetected. Figures suggest that up to four times the number of beds are free than normal for this time of year after a huge slowdown in non Covid-19 admissions as health bosses aim their focus at the pandemic response. Hospitals have cancelled 'thousands' of their non-urgent surgeries - like hip and knee operations and IVF treatment - to free up space for infected patients, and operating theatres, equipped with oxygen supplies, have been turned into coronavirus wards. This was a mere 4 weeks after the global pandemic was declared. People were calling BS on the whole panic thing and dancing "nurses" reaction that quickly.
Ivanhoe Posted November 10 Posted November 10 Another insightful article; https://brownstone.org/articles/above-all-else-it-was-a-spectacle/ Quote Swiss Policy Research conducted an analysis of the Wuhan Covid photos and videos and concluded that many were either staged or had nothing to do with Covid (in fact they were “drunk people, homeless people, road accidents, unspecified medical emergencies, and even training exercises”). So why were they released and marketed to the public as Covid-related images? In retrospect, it now appears that we were being presented with the opening scenes from the movie Contagion transposed from the movie theater to the newspapers. Contagion, more than any other movie, trained us to expect this to happen and now sure enough, it was happening! Quote New York City really outdid itself when it came to pandemic theater. NYC had among the worst pandemic outcomes anywhere in the world. But that was because they obediently followed the lethal and moronic CDC guidelines and hospitals used the wrong protocols (zero prophylaxis or early treatment and overuse of ventilators that killed 90 percent of patients). The images that became iconic were testaments to NYC’s failures to think critically and logically about the challenges at hand. The US Naval Ship Comfort contained 1,000 beds and 1,200 medical personnel and sat mostly empty before departing. Quote In April and May 2020, refrigerated morgue trucks captured the public imagination for weeks. But they were not the result of Covid per se, rather this is what happens when hospitals kill 90 percent of their Covid patients by using the wrong protocols. An analysis by Jeffrey Tucker at Brownstone Institute showed that refrigerated morgue trucks became necessary because lockdowns closed funeral homes and cemeteries, artificially creating a backlog. Quote Nothing captured the psyop better than the thousands of videos on TikTok of nurses and doctors in empty hospital wards at a time when the world was locked down in order “to preserve hospital capacity.” These are elaborate dance routines that would have taken many hours to choreograph, practice, and record. One thing I have not seen mentioned is the fact that dozens (hundreds if not thousands worldwide) of university-educated white people can suddenly do a dance originating from Africa, to a song most of them had never heard before. Sorry, I ain't buying it.
DougK Posted November 12 Posted November 12 If this PubMed topic search I just entered does not itself scare the shit out of you, it should. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=dancing+nurses
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now