Ivanhoe Posted January 3 Posted January 3 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/02/cancer-cases-missed-covid-19-lockdowns-who-study-1-million/ Quote Nearly a quarter of all new cancer cases may have been missed during the Covid pandemic, a World Health Organisation (WHO) study has found. Researchers said lockdown restrictions and pressures on healthcare systems saw diagnoses of the disease drop by 23 per cent globally, suggesting it was not identified in around one million people. The findings come after experts analysed the results of more than 240 different studies, providing the first comprehensive worldwide assessment of the impact of Covid on cancer care. The researchers found there had been a 23 per cent drop in the number of cancer diagnoses made after spring 2020, a 39 per cent decline in cancer screening, a 24 per cent drop in diagnostic procedures and a 28 per cent reduction in treatments. Quote A previous study by the University of Oxford found there had been a “substantial impact” on cancer screening and diagnoses in the UK in 2020 and 2021 caused by the pandemic. It estimated that 18,000 breast, 13,000 colorectal, 10,000 lung, and 21,000 prostate cancer diagnoses were missed from March 2020 to December 2021.
Ivanhoe Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Excellent interview, though there is some annoying background noise towards the end;
sunday Posted January 9 Posted January 9 The case of Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis continues to be relevant more than 150 years after his death/assassination
Ivanhoe Posted January 11 Posted January 11 https://nypost.com/2025/01/10/business/biden-officials-screamed-at-meta-execs-to-take-down-vaccine-posts-mark-zuckerberg/ Quote Wearing a brown T-shirt and gold-chain, the suddenly conservative-sounding tech tycoon spent the first hour of the nearly three-hour sit-down discussing the strong-arm tactics Team Biden used to silence those who cast doubt on the COVID vaccine – a topic dear to Rogan’s heart. Biden officials phoned executives at Meta to “scream” and “curse” at them while demanding that they remove any negative posts about the coronavirus vaccine on Facebook, said Zuckerberg, rehashing the the admission he made in front of Congress over the summer. “It was brutal,” Zuckerberg said during the interview on the “Joe Rogan Experience,” released Friday. “The US government should be defending its companies, not be at the tip of the spear attacking its companies,” When Rogan – who sparked controversy by questioning the efficacy of the vaccines — asked whether those phone calls were recorded, Zuckerberg responded that he didn’t think so. Ironically, Meta records everything people do on FB etc., but they don't record incoming phone calls.
JWB Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Never expected this: https://x.com/MailOnline/status/1878397798791442653 Dozens of British women have seen their breasts grow after the Covid jab - experts reveal why.
Ivanhoe Posted January 14 Posted January 14 https://www.paulawrightdysmemics.com/p/episode-7-matt-ridley-viral-the-search Matt Ridley, by the numbers.
17thfabn Posted January 26 Posted January 26 12 hours ago, JWB said: Surprise!!! Can we have a world wide class action suit against the CCP for wrongful death of relatives and injury to others?
rmgill Posted January 27 Posted January 27 On 1/26/2025 at 9:12 AM, 17thfabn said: Can we have a world wide class action suit against the CCP for wrongful death of relatives and injury to others? Have to include the NIH for the Gain of Function research.
Stargrunt6 Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Speaking of, this site takes VAERS data and makes it easier to search: https://openvaers.com/
Ivanhoe Posted January 30 Posted January 30 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/untested-and-uncontested-the-mass-produced-covid-vaccines-that-skipped-clinical-trials/ Quote WHAT IF the vaccine you received had not been in a clinical trial? For millions of people worldwide, this is precisely what happened when they unknowingly received a covid vaccine manufactured using a process where the end product had never been trialled in humans. This manufacturing shift resulted in significantly higher rates of adverse reactions – 13 times more in some cases – representing a regulatory failure with profound implications for public trust and safety. Yet, the UK Covid-19 Inquiry tasked with investigating these critical decisions has avoided addressing this issue, which lies at the heart of the controversy on regulatory failure. Imagine a chef perfecting a recipe in a small kitchen, only to mass-produce it in a factory using different ingredients and techniques. In December 2020, the UK’s drug regulator, MHRA, gave a temporary authorisation to a mass-manufactured vaccine (Process 2 or P2) without requiring human trial data. Available safety and efficacy data were based solely on Process 1 (P1), the small-scale clinical trial method. MHRA relied on lab-based‘comparability’ studies to justify the switch, but these assessments failed to account for potential risks posed by even minor manufacturing changes. This article delves into how the critical manufacturing switch occurred, why it went largely unchallenged, and implications for public health, safety, and regulatory accountability. So, in broad strokes the MHRA did what the FDA did in the US when Cutter Laboratories failed to perform any safety studies of their botched polio vaccine.
sunday Posted January 30 Posted January 30 12 hours ago, Stargrunt6 said: Speaking of, this site takes VAERS data and makes it easier to search: https://openvaers.com/ Were the assumptions about hacking of VAERS debunked already?
Ivanhoe Posted January 30 Posted January 30 AFAIK, the pro-mRNA crowd studiously avoids ever mentioning VAERS these days. They gave up claiming false reports were uploaded, after folks familiar with it pointed out that the reports come from clinicians and can be tracked.
sunday Posted January 30 Posted January 30 Another thing the usual suspects would not apologize for, then.
sunday Posted February 12 Posted February 12 https://gab.com/DFlirt/posts/113988795263798261 Quote Pfizer whistleblower releases internal documents showing they had received over 158,000 adverse reaction reports within 2 months of it's release. https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/b3/83/28/b383285f091a2b0d1f45caae505f9e10.mp4 This should not be allowed to fall into some memory hole.
Ivanhoe Posted February 12 Posted February 12 I believe that video is mostly fictional. A Dr. David Cartland appears to be the source, and appears to me to be all social media amplification and no actual data. That said; https://www.fda.gov/media/184988/download https://www.fda.gov/media/130216/download https://harald-walach.info/2025/01/31/people-with-covid-19-vaccination-are-sicker/ https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/are-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnancy-as-safe-and-effective-as-the-medical-industrial-complex-claim-part-i/ The continuance of research into the numbers, to me, indicates that the quant jocks smell blood in the water.
Ivanhoe Posted February 12 Posted February 12 The Branch Covidians sure act like criminals trying to maintain a coverup;
Ivanhoe Posted February 12 Posted February 12 "hot lots" https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/batch-dependent-safety-of-the-bnt162b2-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-in-the-united-states/ Quote Several years after one of the, if not the, largest pharmaceutical roll-out in human history, there remain many unknowns and unknowables. Which vaccines shipped actually went into an arm? How did administration training differ by service and geography? Was appropriate time given for aspiration of the needle (5 to 10 seconds), and slowly enough to allow the deltoid muscle fibers to expand and retain the injection (10 seconds per milliliter)? How do VAERS classifications align with medical diagnoses? And of course, what is the true differential under-reporting factor? These are just the basics for understanding outcome and none of these are known, which is a disservice to pharmacovigilance and undercuts every statement of safety.
Ivanhoe Posted February 12 Posted February 12 https://billricejr.substack.com/p/maths-a-great-invention-its-a-shame Quote In a recent column, I used basic sixth-grade-level math to prove that Covid is/was not a “deadly virus.” What I did was start with an assumption/hypothesis (which scientists and journalists have to do in our work) and then started using multiplication. Using math and the results of the Red Cross Covid antibody study (which found 2.04 percent of one sample of blood donors had Covid antibodies by December 1st 2019), I extrapolated two percent to the national population of 330 million and deduced that 6.6 million Americans were probably already infected with the virus that’s said to cause the disease Covid-19. I then multiplied the oft-published Infection Fatality Rate of 3.4 percent by 6.6 million people and concluded that 224,000 Americans should have been dead from Covid by around December 22, 2019. (Per the experts, on average, it takes 21 days to die from Covid). The IFRs used in The Narrative have been fictional from the get-go.
Tim Sielbeck Posted February 12 Posted February 12 I liked this part: Dad’s iron-clad New Abnormal Maxims, including these unfortunate conclusions: No experts, authorities, or mainstream journalists know how to use basic, simple math - which I can prove … with math. I don’t think members of the Education Complex particularly like people who actually learned math and know how to apply it to answer questions which should be important for “informed” citizens.
JWB Posted February 12 Posted February 12 For the first time since 2020, Covid is now killing fewer people than flu across the US, official figures show. CDC data showed that in the week to February 1, the latest available, 1.5 percent of all deaths were linked to Covid, while two percent were down to the flu. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14389303/Covid-officially-deadly-seasonal-flu.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=social-twitter_mailonline
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now