sunday Posted June 23 Posted June 23 When it was that someone in this same Grate Sight wrote that the use of the term "turbo-cancer" was an indication of the writer being an anti-science, conspiracy theorist?
Ivanhoe Posted June 23 Posted June 23 37 minutes ago, sunday said: When it was that someone in this same Grate Sight wrote that the use of the term "turbo-cancer" was an indication of the writer being an anti-science, conspiracy theorist? Amusingly, that particular guy calls out the researcher who invented the term, and then goes on to use it repeatedly in multiple videos rather than the more science-y term.
Ivanhoe Posted June 25 Posted June 25 https://modernity.news/2024/06/22/biden-admin-asked-amazon-to-hide-vaccine-critical-books-during-the-pandemic/ Quote The Biden Administration pressured Amazon to hide books for sale on its platform that were critical of vaccines during the pandemic, it has been revealed. The findings were presented by the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in documents that show Amazon reduced the visibility of titles that the government deemed overly critical of big pharma shots. The documents show that some books were simply generally critical of vaccines, with several written by medical professionals. Some were even just reviews of scientific studies. The Federal government compiled a “Do Not Promote” list, to which more than 40 titles were added. In a series of X posts, Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jim Jordan explained how internal emails from Amazon contain employees revealed that “the impetus for this request is criticism from the Biden Administration.” Fahrenheit 451 is supposed to be a warning, not a how-to manual.
Ivanhoe Posted June 25 Posted June 25 https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/06/02/six-foot-rule-covid-no-science/
Ivanhoe Posted July 6 Posted July 6 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/7/1343 Quote Immortal time bias (ITB) is common in cohort studies and distorts the association estimates between the treated and untreated. We used data from an Italian study on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, with a large cohort, long follow-up, and adjustment for confounding factors, affected by ITB, with the aim to verify the real impact of the vaccination campaign by comparing the risk of all-cause death between the vaccinated population and the unvaccinated population. We aligned all subjects on a single index date and considered the “all-cause deaths” outcome to compare the survival distributions of the unvaccinated group versus various vaccination statuses. The all-cause-death hazard ratios in univariate analysis for vaccinated people with 1, 2, and 3/4 doses versus unvaccinated people were 0.88, 1.23, and 1.21, respectively. The multivariate values were 2.40, 1.98, and 0.99. Possible explanations of this trend of the hazard ratios as vaccinations increase could be a harvesting effect; a calendar-time bias, accounting for seasonality and pandemic waves; a case-counting window bias; a healthy-vaccinee bias; or some combination of these factors. With 2 and even with 3/4 doses, the calculated Restricted Mean Survival Time and Restricted Mean Time Lost have shown a small but significant downside for the vaccinated populations.
Ivanhoe Posted July 6 Posted July 6 https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/bmjph/2/1/e000282.full.pdf Quote Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality.
Ivanhoe Posted July 6 Posted July 6 https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/documents-catch-nih-officials-misleading Quote On the other hand, Ohio State University researcher Linda Saif told Science Magazine’s Jocelyn Kaiser that she was worried that excessive regulation could “greatly impede research into evolving or emerging viruses” and drive research overseas, where U.S. regulations don’t apply or are looser. Oddly enough, I previously reported that Saif helped orchestrate a February 2020 essay ghostwritten by Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology that called the possibility of a Wuhan lab accident a “conspiracy.”
Ivanhoe Posted July 6 Posted July 6 https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/top-medical-journals-promoting-ethics Quote Medical journals continue to ignore evidence that one of their own members of the International Committee of Journal Editors (ICMJE) refuses to investigate calls to retract an unethical Nature Medicine paper that Members of Congress have reported is ghostwritten by funders, after congressional investigators examined emails and deposed authors. Editors at multiple journals that help promote ICMJE’s ethical standards did not respond to emails regarding Nature Medicine’s unscrupulous behavior. “I understand that you have contacted individual members of ICMJE and I am responding on behalf of ICMJE collectively to your inquiry below,” emailed ICMJE Secretary Christina C. Wee, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. “ICMJE is a small volunteer committee of medical journal editors and while we publish what we consider to be best practices, we do not have any oversight or enforcement authority and do not comment or offer advice on specific cases.” When asked if ICMJE will allow Nature Medicine to remain an ICMJE member while violating ICMJE's own standards on authorship, Dr. Wee refused to respond.
rmgill Posted July 7 Posted July 7 The medical community and regulators both have been captured by the large pharmaceutical corps.
lucklucky Posted July 8 Posted July 8 I don't think that is all it. This corruption is more of arrogance and hubris.
Murph Posted July 8 Posted July 8 Can this be the beginning of the End for Doctor Death Fauci, and his illegal schemes, endorsed and supported by the liberal medical associations? I hope so, this spanks the Galveston District Judge, and sends it back telling him, please try again, and this time obey the law. I want to see them bankrupted, and forced to grovel. https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/23-40423/23-40423-2024-06-03.pdf?ts=1717435815
Ivanhoe Posted July 13 Posted July 13 https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Testimony-Quay-2024-06-18.pdf Quote I do not receive any funding from either NIH or NIAID and therefore do not have a conflict of interest with respect to my testimony as it relates to the topics of today’s hearing. Scientists whose livelihood depends on NIH or NIAID funding may have pressure to publicly agree with orthodoxies that, in their private communications with their colleagues, they admit are not correct. Quote In 2018, Baric and Daszak from the US, Shi from the WIV, and Linfa Wang from Singapore wrote a grant to DARPA called DEFUSE. In this grant they proposed to hunt for viruses from the caves in Yunnan that RaTG13, the closest virus to SARS2, came from. They were looking for viruses that were about 25% different from SARS1. They would adapt these viruses to infect and kill human cells by growing the new viruses in human cells in a petri dish and in transgenic animals with human lung ACE2. They proposed using the same restriction sites in the analysis I just conducted to move pieces of the genetic material around. They also proposed inserting a “human specific” furin cleavage site, like the one found in SARS2 at an exact spot in the gene called the S1/S2 junction. SARS2 has the proposed backbone from the proposed region of China, has the proposed adaption for human killing, has the proposed 22% diversity from SARS1, has the proposed No See Em cleavage site profile, and the proposed human furin cleavage site at the proposed S1/S2 junction. The grant from the WIV and US colleagues predicts seven features found in SARS2!
Tim the Tank Nut Posted July 13 Posted July 13 that last quote... It is chilling and not in a good way
Ivanhoe Posted July 15 Posted July 15 https://amgreatness.com/2024/07/12/former-cdc-director-says-fda-underreported-adverse-side-effects-of-covid-injections-to-prevent-vaccine-hesitancy/ Quote Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said Thursday that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pushed a false “safe and effective” COVID vaccine narrative by underreporting adverse events. The mRNA shots “never should have been mandated,” Redfield told the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Thursday. The Democrat-controlled Senate oversight hearing entitled “Risky Research: Oversight of U.S. Taxpayer Funded High-Risk Virus Research,” included witnesses Dr. Gerald Parker, Dr. Carrie Wolinetz, Dr. Kevin Esvelt, and Redfield. Former President Trump’s CDC director accused the Biden government of suppressing data about vaccine injuries in an effort to prevent vaccine hesitancy.
Ivanhoe Posted July 15 Posted July 15 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/yet-another-mhra-drug-scandal-part-one/ https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/yet-another-mhra-drug-scandal-part-two/
JWB Posted July 15 Posted July 15 The development of pericarditis (and myocarditis) after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is very rare but has still been reported more often than expected. A study that analyzed data from 40 healthcare systems in the United States (same as above) found the incidence of pericarditis or myocarditis after the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be the following across all age groups and after any vaccine dose:6 For males: 6.5 cases per 100,000 among males ages 5–11 years 37.1 cases per 100,000 among males ages 12–17 years 22.0 cases per 100,000 among males ages 18–29 years 15.8 cases per 100,000 among males ages 30 years or older For females: 0 cases per 100,000 among females ages 5–11 years 7.5 cases per 100,000 among females ages 12–17 years 8.7 cases per 100,000 among females ages 18–29 years 10.1 cases per 100,000 among males ages 30 years or older https://www.verywellhealth.com/pericarditis-and-covid-8423590
Ivanhoe Posted July 21 Posted July 21 No bombshells, as Fauci was as careful with electronic communications as any other criminal; https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-06-21/read-dr-fauci-s-covid-pandemic-text-messages Here's the actual story; Quote NIAID had already given me thousands of pages of Fauci’s emails. But the agency wasn’t eager to turn over his text messages. More than three years after I filed my initial request, and then sued, NIAID claimed that I’d dropped that portion of my request and therefore wasn’t entitled to the text messages. Me? Drop part of my FOIA request? No way! It was just one of many tactics by NIAID to skirt transparency after Covid was declared a pandemic. Ultimately, after weeks of back and forth last summer, NIAID backtracked and started releasing the texts, one of which merited a brief mention in a recent edition of FOIA Files. This is what I’ve gotten so far: 42 pages of texts with about 15 people. NIAID is staffed by liars, plain and simple.
Ivanhoe Posted July 26 Posted July 26 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2024/07/26/covid-vaccine-us-china-propaganda/74555829007/ Quote Washington, D.C. – The U.S. Defense Department admitted it spread propaganda in the Philippines aimed at disparaging China’s Sinovac vaccine during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a June 25 document cited by a former top government official earlier this month. The U.S. response to the Philippines was recounted in a podcast by Harry Roque, who served as spokesman for former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. Reuters subsequently reviewed the document, which hasn’t been publicly released by either government. The news agency was able to verify its contents with a source familiar with the U.S. response. “It is true that the (Department of Defense) did message Philippines audiences questioning the safety and efficacy of Sinovac,” according to the document, which references information sent from the U.S. Defense Department to the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs and Department of National Defense. According to the document, the Pentagon also conceded it had “made some missteps in our COVID-related messaging” but assured the Philippines that the military “has vastly improved oversight and accountability of information operations” since 2022. But wait, there's more; Quote The U.S. admission followed a June 14 Reuters investigation that revealed how the Pentagon launched a secret psychological operation to discredit Chinese vaccines and other COVID-19 aid in 2020 and 2021, at the height of the pandemic. Through phony internet accounts with tens of thousands of followers meant to impersonate Filipinos, social media posts decried the quality of face masks, test kits and China's Sinovac shot. As a result of the Reuters investigation, the Philippine Senate Foreign Relations Committee launched a hearing into the matter and sought a response from the U.S. Gosh, DOD sure spooled up that psyop Rikki-Tik.
rmgill Posted July 26 Posted July 26 So the DoD and CIA were working for "US" Multinational corporations by targeting the citizens of our allies? No, that's not suspect at all.
Ivanhoe Posted July 27 Posted July 27 Behind a paywall; https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/navy-to-expunge-records-for-seals-sailors-who-refused-covid-vaccines-5694073 Quote The U.S. Navy has agreed to correct the records of SEALs and sailors who declined to receive COVID-19 vaccines due to their religious beliefs, under a settlement approved by a federal court on July 24. “Defendants agree to re-review the personnel records of all class members to ensure that the U.S. Navy has permanently removed records indicating administrative separation processing or proceedings, formal counseling, and non-judicial punishment actions taken against the class members solely on the basis of non-compliance with the COVID-19 vaccine mandate and adverse information related to non-compliance with the COVID-19 vaccine mandate,” the settlement agreement states. The review must be finished within nine months, according to the agreement. Expand Its a good start.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now