Covid-19 Pandemic

[lucklucky]

It was a Trumpian conspiracy theory if we followed NYT, not even an hypothesis, but now...

 

Why the Pandemic Probably Started in a Lab, in 5 Key Points

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/03/opinion/covid-lab-leak.html

[sunday]

A too long video perhaps, but quite deserved

 

[lucklucky]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/covid-vaccines-may-helped-fuel-051100916.html

Quote

 

Researchers from The Netherlands analysed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend continuing despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures.

They said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns” and called on governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible vaccine harms.

 

 

[Ivanhoe]

4 hours ago, lucklucky said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/covid-vaccines-may-helped-fuel-051100916.html

 

Paper here; https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282

[sunday]

8 hours ago, Ivanhoe said:

Paper here; https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282

Dr. Campbell video on that paper

 

[JWB]

In related news:

Syphilis rates continue to rise in the U.S. as experts warn of “out-of-control” STI crisis (msn.com)

[JWB]

 

[Ivanhoe]

Good interview;

https://rumble.com/v2n1dl0-james-miller-being-interviewed-by-alison-morrow.html

 

[JWB]

COVID can seriously damage your vision, even if you didn’t have symptoms, new study says. Experts say to watch for these signs (msn.com)

[Ivanhoe]

https://brownstone.org/articles/over-100-ivermectin-studies-a-summary/

 

[sunday]

More "conspiracy theories"... Now, on impartial, unselfish, disinterested experts. Medical doctors in this case.

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/the-case-of-the-disappearing-article?publication_id=602373&post_id=145602789&isFreemail=true&r=1gndfr&triedRedirect=true

Quote

The disappeared article looks at the murky world of ‘Celebrity’ doctors.

Would you believe it - the doctors who were on TV telling you to get vaccinated were also getting paid by the same pharmaceutical companies selling the vaccines.

Camilla Turner, Sunday Political Editor at the Telegraph, disclosed that high profile doctors had not been declaring the thousands of pounds they had been receiving from pharmaceutical giants before appearing on primetime TV to discuss their products.

The thing I am actually shocked about is how little money the doctors were paid by the pharma companies!

Once again, the Telegraph article only focusses on the AstraZeneca vaccine which seems to have been designated the position of fall guy for all vaccine injuries. And it only discusses recent debates about a “small percentage of cases” displaying a “rare and dangerous side effect” rather than the coercion that was taking place as soon as the vaccine rollout began.

Nevertheless, it is great to see a mainstream paper investigate this massive conflict of interest.

The article looked at doctors such as Dr. Ranj Singh who was paid £22,500 by AstraZeneca. He was on Morning TV leading a discussion about the vaccine, apparently without declaring his payments to the BBC.

Another doctor was Dr. Nighat Arif who had appeared on TV without declaring her £10,000 payment by Astra-Zeneca in 2022.

Dr. Phillipa Kaye was another TV doctor paid £12,500 by AstraZeneca in 2020 and £9,000 in 2022.

This time, the Telegraph does point out that Dr. Kaye “was prominent on social media, posting videos of herself encouraging people to get the Covid vaccine,” during the pandemic.

According to the article, clause 24 of the ABPI code of practice for pharmaceutical companies requires them to include provisions relating to disclosure of payments when they draw up contracts with doctors.

“The code says that “in their written contracts or agreements, companies must include provisions regarding the obligation of the individual to declare that they are a contracted individual to the company whenever they write or speak in public about a matter that is the subject of the agreement or any other issue relating to that company”.”

It seems the doctors are trying to get around this by saying that “they were not paid by AstraZeneca specifically in relation to the Covid vaccine”. All the doctors featured in the article say that they were paid to promote a flu vaccine rather than the Covid one.

What a ridiculously easy loop-hole! If you are being paid by a company to promote one particular product, you are highly unlikely to criticise their other products.

This was good exposure of the murky world of pharmaceutical payments to TV doctors but why was the article taken down?

Furthermore, why the focus on just AstraZeneca? Let’s do Pfizer and Moderna now please.

 

[NickM]

On 6/11/2024 at 8:22 AM, JWB said:

COVID can seriously damage your vision, even if you didn’t have symptoms, new study says. Experts say to watch for these signs (msn.com)

Same page: Keeping health equity a priority

[Ivanhoe]

State of Kansas is suing Pfizer;

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24764930-kansas-suit-against-pfizer

 

 

[sunday]

Quote

Jun 19, 2024
Mr. Kris Kobach, Kansas Attorney General.

Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.

https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx...

Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events,

including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. 

Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. 

Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. 

Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public. 

Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
 
To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
 
Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years. 

Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas. 

Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act
 
Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission. 

28. Millions of Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 

29. In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 

30. Pfizer took advantage of Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. 
in Kansas. 

B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 

57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements with governments around the world. 

C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine.
 
65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, 
analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.”

D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 

E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 

86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine.

87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
 
88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo, more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as of March 13, 2021.

 

[JWB]

Fauci admits school closures were 'not a good idea' | Watch (msn.com)

[17thfabn]

1 hour ago, JWB said:

Fauci admits school closures were 'not a good idea' | Watch (msn.com)

On a related note SAT and ACT scores continue to drop post COVID.

"According to her and others like Vera Murphy Trayner, the owner of Veritas College Counseling, one of the big factors leading to the lower scores is COVID 19. The class of 2023 is the first class to go through high school from the start of the pandemic."

https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/national/act-scores-drop-to-new-30-year-low-sat-scores-drop-as-well

[Ivanhoe]

Its been pointed out a number of times that the strongest proponents of the lockdown were the upper-middle class folks who kept their kids in private schools, which remained open.

Metaphorically pulling the educational ladder up to suppress competition from the poors.

 

[sunday]

A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination

Quote

Highlights

•We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.

•Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death.

•These findings indicate the urgent need to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of death with the goal of risk stratification and avoidance of death for the large numbers of individuals who have taken or will receive one or more COVID-19 vaccines in the future.

•This review helps provide the medical and forensic community a better understanding of COVID-19 vaccine fatal adverse events.

Quote

Abstract

Background

The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and necropsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included. Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Results

We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).

Conclusions

The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

 

[Ivanhoe]

Good interview with Scott Atlas;

 

[Ivanhoe]

Its amusing to hear Atlas talk about Redfield in the early days, versus what Redfield is claiming now. It appears that Redfield is running scared; scared of lawsuit, prosecution, who knows.

 

[Ivanhoe]

The good stuff starts at around 4:00;

Definitely some safety signals being ignored by the Branch Covidians.

[Murph]

Cause=effect maybe?

 

[sunday]

5 minutes ago, Murph said:

Cause=effect maybe?

(...)

In absence of autopsy results, only correlation.

[sunday]

43 minutes ago, Ivanhoe said:

The good stuff starts at around 4:00;

Definitely some safety signals being ignored by the Branch Covidians.

Quote

We review a preprint that introduces a case of lymphoma immediately post vaccination and summarizes all currently scientifically published cases of cancer post mRNA vaccines and what might be the causes of such events.

What we cover:
*Who introduced the term “turbo cancers”
*Why are scientists using non-scientific references these days
*Description of a new case of lymphoma post vaccination
*Summary of past published cases and what has been observed
*Potential mechanisms of cancer development post vaccination proposed by authors

More than worrying.

[Ivanhoe]

One of his following videos talked about monitoring blood levels IgG4 levels*, also about the possibility of a genetic predisposition towards turbo cancers.

 

* Apparently there's a range of "normal" levels of IgG4, and there is concern that a small percentage of mRNA recipients end up with overly high levels.