Ivanhoe Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024036788 Quote No significant difference in all-cause mortality rates or PCR negative conversion between IVM and controls. There were significant differences in MV requirement (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47–0.96) and AEs (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.95) between the two groups. Ivermectin could reduce the risk of MV requirement and AEs in patients with COVID-19, without increasing other risks. In the absence of a better alternative, clinicians could use it with caution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, Ivanhoe said: A cogent comment: Quote It is said that for an experimental drug to be released under emergency rules, there is not allowed to be any other current drug that can be used. Therefore, if Ivermectin was proven to be effective against this issue, then the jab legally cannot be released under the emergency legislation. As the jab is still an experimental, untested drug, Ivermectin is still not officially recognized to have any benefit in this situation. This relates to any other product that could be used to fight this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 EcoHealth Alliance was the NGO working in gain of function research with that Wuhan laboratory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murph Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Prosecute him under Crimes against Humanity. Death penalty if convicted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Francis Collins testifying before House Select Committee January 12, 2024; https://www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024.05.16-SSCP-Staff-Memo.pdf full transcript; https://www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Collins-Transcript-5.16-Release.pdf Quote Q. All it’s calling for is a “yes” or “no.” Is the possibility of a lab leak a conspiracy theory? A. You have to define what you mean by a lab leak. Q. Putting aside de novo, the possibility of a laboratory or research related accident, a researcher doing something in a lab, getting infected with a virus, and then sparking the pandemic. Is that scenario a conspiracy theory? A. Not at this point. Quote Q. Moving on to social distancing and the various regulations surrounding that. On March 22, 2020, the CDC issued guidance describing social distancing to include remaining out congregant settings, avoiding mass gatherings, and maintaining a distance of approximately six feet from others when possible. We asked Dr. Fauci where the six feet came from and he said it kind of just appeared, is the quote. Do you recall science or evidence that supported the six-feet distance? A. I do not. Q. Is that I do not recall or I do not see any evidence supporting six feet? A. I did not see evidence, but I’m not sure I would have been shown evidence at that point. Q. Since then, it has been an awfully large topic. Have you seen any evidence since then supporting six feet? A. No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37064937/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitflegal Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 On 5/16/2024 at 3:33 AM, sunday said: A cogent comment: That's a pretty poor reading of the relevant section in 1025. The relevant section is For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. A potential alternative product may be considered “unavailable” if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need. A potential alternative product may be considered "inadequate" if, for example, there are contraindicating data for special circumstances or populations (e.g., children, immunocompromised individuals, or individuals with a drug allergy), if a dosage form of an approved product is inappropriate for use in a special population (e.g., a tablet for individuals who cannot swallow pills), or if the agent is or may be resistant to approved and available alternative products. The last section is supported by further FDA guidances since 2016 so there is a very purposeful wiggle room that allows the agency to argue that existing treatments have some utility but the virus is going to make that not broadly effective. In simple terms, if an emergency is declared you can't use an EUA if there is already an effective, broadly efficacious treatment already available but you can if there is an existing treatment that has significant limitations. Even if they had recommended Ivermectin and exercise as temporary approaches it wouldn't have stopped the vaccine EUA. I haven't been able to get much information from friends in CDC/NiH but what little I have gotten still makes me think that the primary reason was panic at the Federal level (and in the spring of 2020 it's been under-reported how much those agencies were literally sh*tting their pants that this was a movie level outbreak scenario) and they were afraid of giving people any hope because it would cause a breakdown of their lockdown approaches and have people mingling against their recommendations. And, to be fair, when the vaccines came out exactly that happened and the fatality rates went up again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted May 19 Share Posted May 19 Newfound autoimmune syndrome tied to COVID-19 can trigger deadly lung scarring (msn.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 https://pjmedia.com/kevindowneyjr/2024/05/23/what-do-fauci-hunter-and-the-titanic-have-in-common-n4929261 Quote Fauci's 20-year stooge at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), David Morens, who is also the best friend of Dr. Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, testified before Congress on Wednesday and all but pooped his socks. Apparently, there are discrepancies in Morens' testimony in January and some documents Congress uncovered afterward. Congress brought Morens to Capitol Hill today to ask why he used a Gmail account to dodge the Freedom of Informant Act (FOIA) when communicating about the COVID virus we were assured came, not from a lab, but from a guy who ate a bat salad, so that he could “delete anything he doesn’t want to see in the New York Times.” While being questioned by Rep. James Comer, R-Ky.), Morens stammered like Joe Biden at a Girl Scout meeting. He clearly knew Congress had done its homework. Morens was busted in a big fat felonious lie. Several actually. "He denied discussing EcoHealth and the WIV (Wuhan Institute of Virology) with Dr. Fauci, but in his emails, he did. He denied conducting official NIAID or NIH (National Institute of Health) business over his personal emails. He did,” committee Chairman Brad Wenstrup, (R-Ohio) quipped to the Washington Examiner. Morens advised his "best friend" on how to get his Wuhan grant back after Trump canceled it in 2020. He also sought help from the "FOIA lady" on how to not get busted. "I learned from our FOIA lady on how to make emails disappear," Morens emailed to NIH officials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SSCP-Staff-Memo_Morens-5.22.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 Another conspiracy theory that proves true... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 Dissecting the New York Times' Plea for Vaccine Amnesty Quote •Repeatedly forcing the public (e.g., through mandates) to use unsafe and ineffective therapies (that injured millions) has created a public relations disaster for the establishment. • Various attempts have been made to do the impossible—restore the public’s trust in our medical institutions without any of them admitting fault. •Here, I review each of the previous attempts and how they were used to create the recent infamous article by the NYT—which while monumental for bringing attention to the COVID vaccine-injured, also repeats a variety of strategic and very harmful lies to protect the vaccine industry. •One of the mysteries of the COVID-19 response is what could have possibly justified breaking the public’s trust in the medical institutions our society revolves around. Here I will review the most compelling explanations we’ve come across after three years of investigating this commonly asked question. Remember: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 26 Share Posted May 26 https://biosafetynow.substack.com/p/correcting-congressional-testimony Quote The following statement is written by Milton Leitenberg, a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland (CISSM). . Quote Both Dr. Morens and the Committee counsel who accepted his word were mistaken, and in 2024 they certainly should not have been. The lab did not explode. There was no “explosion.” . Quote Anthracis production at Compound 19 worked in shifts, 24 hours per day. As any such facility must, Compound 19 had an air handling system which filtered the air leaving the plant, and moreover the facility was located within the city limits. The Soviets used an accordion-like filter located in the exhaust ducts to filter particles out of the plant air before the air was expelled to the outside. At the end of one shift a clogged filter was removed, which was a routine occurrence. According to the narrative of the shift supervisor, Lt. Col Nikolai Chernyshev, a new filter was not emplaced directly, but a note was left for the next shift supervisor to do that. The note was overlooked and the next shift switched on the dryers and milled dry powder anthracis spores escaped from the plant through the air vents. After some time the accident was noticed and a new filter was installed, but in the interval a sufficient quantity of spores had escaped from Compound 19 to be lethal four kilometers downwind. Officially 66 people died, but it is suspected that the actual number is higher, perhaps around 100. Dr. Morens’ statement that the release of anthracis spores from Compound 19 in Sverdlovsk “-- wasn't a lab-related thing” is of course nonsense. Human error of whatever kind in a laboratory or related facility handling pathogens qualifies as “an accident.” More importantly, in addition to the error per se, any broader implications that Dr. Morens drew from his false claim are therefore invalidated. Morens is a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 Pfizer reps as slippery as they come; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 Pfizer employees in Oztralia got "special sauce" because reasons. https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2402592 Quote Disorders caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) gained major attention during the pandemic, when platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies were found to explain vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) after coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccination with two adenoviral vector–based vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen). Affected patients often have multiple or unusual sites of thromboses, such as the cerebral venous sinus and splanchnic veins, with high levels of d-dimer. . Quote We conclude that the antibodies induced by adenoviral vector–based Covid-19 vaccination (classic VITT) and the VITT-like antibodies induced by natural adenovirus infection are extremely similar. Such an extraordinary level of autoantibody fingerprint identity between two disorders — at the level of patient-derived antibodies — strongly indicates that VITT and the anti-PF4 disorder that is associated with adenoviral infection are a distinct class of adverse immune responses associated with viral (presumably, adenoviral) structures. I guess the followup question should be, whether caused by infection natural or artificial, where are we at in terms of the diagnosis-treatment-recovery process? Seems like there should be a silver lining to the cloud of vaccine injury and subsequent research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunday Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 It looks like some people has no shame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that. (msn.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now