Jump to content
tanknet.org

Because The British Royal Family


Recommended Posts

The LAPD will provide its standard celebrity protection level to the couple just fine. Unless they plan on roughing it apart from the thousands of other celebrities of fame and wealth in the area.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Times is British. The Sun is conservative, but columnists and editors do have varied opinions. As I said earlier, there isn't really much interest here as far as I can tell.

 

If they want to live near her family and work, why shouldn't they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should say "no, he had mild symptoms and self-isolated for seven further days."

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52088684

 

The question of Prince Harry's security isn't even a news item here. Americans seem to think of the kind of circus that follows the current President around when they think of security details, but I don't believe that royals generally merit more than a couple of officers when not performing any civic duty, so I suppose that would mean 8 in total if there was a 4 shift system in place.

 

There would be police on site at any civic event as the royals attract the need for crowd control measures. The main residences will have much larger security details, I suppose.

 

As noted above, the print news media and Harry have a poor relationship, predating Meghan, due in part to his outspoken and (frankly, quite valid) opinion as to how his mother was treated by them, and subsequently how his mobile phone messages were "hacked".

 

Specifically, Harry is (or has been) suing the owners of the Mirror and also the Sun over the phone hacking.

 

Meghan is separately suing the Mail on Sunday for what is effectively its ongoing relationship with her father, who appears to be a piece of work, too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should say "no, he had mild symptoms and self-isolated for seven further days."

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52088684

 

The question of Prince Harry's security isn't even a news item here. Americans seem to think of the kind of circus that follows the current President around when they think of security details, but I don't believe that royals generally merit more than a couple of officers when not performing any civic duty, so I suppose that would mean 8 in total if there was a 4 shift system in place.

 

There would be police on site at any civic event as the royals attract the need for crowd control measures. The main residences will have much larger security details, I suppose.

 

As noted above, the print news media and Harry have a poor relationship, predating Meghan, due in part to his outspoken and (frankly, quite valid) opinion as to how his mother was treated by them, and subsequently how his mobile phone messages were "hacked".

 

Specifically, Harry is (or has been) suing the owners of the Mirror and also the Sun over the phone hacking.

 

Meghan is separately suing the Mail on Sunday for what is effectively its ongoing relationship with her father, who appears to be a piece of work, too.

Ah, that explains a lot. The Mirror and Sun are left newspapers? Not as left as the Gruniad but still left? Or are they just trash tabloids?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mirror is vaguely left leaning, the Sun is actually right wing. And both are trash tabloids.

 

His mum could fund her own protection detail, so can they. I really dont know why so much is being made of it, they arent even Royals anymore.

Edited by Stuart Galbraith
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, wasn't there a kerfuffle at one point where Americans decided once and for all not to foot the bill for British royals (or ex-royals)? I'm pretty sure I read about that.

 

--

Soren

See, it was all a waste :P HM glorious realm of Newyorkshire!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...