Mr King Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 I don't expect this post to really go anywhere and is a bit of a wankfest on my part, but I am curious about any AFV's or other ground vehicles that were developed and deployed secretly that later were brought into the public light. Three examples I can think of off the top of my head are the original tanks, canal defense light, and the Israeli Pereh missile carrier. I am mainly interested in post war vehicles and variants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 DD? The 183mm Tank Destroyer seems to have been kept fairly quiet. Probably didnt want anyone in Parliament to ask any questions about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzermann Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 DD? The 183mm Tank Destroyer seems to have been kept fairly quiet. Probably didnt want anyone in Parliament to ask any questions about it. Hobart's Funnies were certainly kept secret. But post WW2 I can only think of projects that went nowhere, or details of tanks like the fence on the Strv103 that were kept secret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 I guess the soviet ones should be included. I found the first photo of a T80 in one of the USMLM reports, initially of just a wheel under a tarp. it was like one of those photographs you get at a car show when they dont quite want to unveil it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzermann Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 I guess the soviet ones should be included. I found the first photo of a T80 in one of the USMLM reports, initially of just a wheel under a tarp. it was like one of those photographs you get at a car show when they dont quite want to unveil it yet. Pretty similar situation, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Warford Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Well...then there's the SU-122-54! 1949: development starts1954: adopted by the Soviet Army1955: first vehicles delivered1955-1957: in production1958: first reported at the SECRET level1969: first (and maybe only) photo published at the SECRET level1996: first official recognition of the SU-122-54 at the unclassified level (41 years after delivery to the Soviet Army) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Estes Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 US heavy tank development in the 1950s used 155mm firing APC and HEAT as a possible guarantee vs Soviet tanks not yet known. There were also projects for laser RF, nuclear engines, glass and other laminate armor, auto loaders, variable suspensions and so forth. As in the 1930s, US Ordnance preferred to work on advanced components vice complete tank designs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Werb Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 Ken, I remember reading an interview in a late 1950s Flight magazine with a senior USArmy officer anticipating nuclear rifle grenades to be issued to individual infantrymen in the not too distant future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R011 Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Starfleet had a light mortar with nuclear* rounds! * or antimatter or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr King Posted August 4, 2019 Author Share Posted August 4, 2019 In the not so distant future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 (edited) Ken, I remember reading an interview in a late 1950s Flight magazine with a senior USArmy officer anticipating nuclear rifle grenades to be issued to individual infantrymen in the not too distant future. I remember reading a book written by Arthur C Clarke 30 years ago (well a compendium headed by him anyway) predicting by July 20th 2019 we would have had a third world war, and all the soldiers, in danger of being shredded by NBC weapons, would be incapable of ever going outside their vehicles. Even infantry sections would have to fight from inside. Even smart guys will believe the strangest things. Edited August 4, 2019 by Stuart Galbraith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Estes Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Ken, I remember reading an interview in a late 1950s Flight magazine with a senior USArmy officer anticipating nuclear rifle grenades to be issued to individual infantrymen in the not too distant future. So it was, Chris, with the Davy Crockett spigot mortar, you had a granate roughly the size of a regulation US softball, 12" circumference. Its inventor was on the university lecture circuit in 1983 and told the story of how a few of the scientists wondered just how small a nuc they could do, amidst all the miniaturization projects then ongoing. When they showed it to the general, he immediately told them to weaponize it. President Kennedy was horrified when told that an infantry battalion commander had its release authority, so he ordered it removed from service. The blast and radiation effects were considered dangerous within its firing range.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted August 4, 2019 Share Posted August 4, 2019 Micronukes are very dirty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougRichards Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 Ken, I remember reading an interview in a late 1950s Flight magazine with a senior USArmy officer anticipating nuclear rifle grenades to be issued to individual infantrymen in the not too distant future. I remember reading a book written by Arthur C Clarke 30 years ago (well a compendium headed by him anyway) predicting by July 20th 2019 we would have had a third world war, and all the soldiers, in danger of being shredded by NBC weapons, would be incapable of ever going outside their vehicles. Even infantry sections would have to fight from inside. Even smart guys will believe the strangest things. The original Blade Runner was set in 2019..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougRichards Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 (edited) Starfleet had a light mortar with nuclear* rounds! * or antimatter or something like that. If you eat pasta and then eat ante pasta will you stay hungry? Edited August 5, 2019 by DougRichards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KV7 Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 (edited) What is the yield on the nuclear rounds for M-240 ? IIRC it was ~2 kt or for the original round but the later one was somewhat more powerful. Edited August 5, 2019 by KV7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inhapi Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 (edited) What about the US nuclear tank concepts ? Did the USSR have something similar that has turned up since 1991 ? (apart from mobile power stations ?) Edited August 5, 2019 by Inhapi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzermann Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 Ken, I remember reading an interview in a late 1950s Flight magazine with a senior USArmy officer anticipating nuclear rifle grenades to be issued to individual infantrymen in the not too distant future. I remember reading a book written by Arthur C Clarke 30 years ago (well a compendium headed by him anyway) predicting by July 20th 2019 we would have had a third world war, and all the soldiers, in danger of being shredded by NBC weapons, would be incapable of ever going outside their vehicles. Even infantry sections would have to fight from inside. Even smart guys will believe the strangest things. This scenario is what many cold war AFVs were developed for. Hence the ports on the sides of Marder, Bradley, BMP1/2, BTR-60/70/80 series etc., NBC protection filters and pverpressure systems in the vehicles etc etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakka Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 In the BTR-60 and BTR-70, the firing ports are not designed to maintain an air seal. They're just portholes in the armour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Kotsch Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 (edited) The BTR-70 are also equipped with a filter ventilation device with NBC filter. When operating the device an overpressure is generated in the interior. The BTR-60PB is quipped with a dust filter ventilation device without, as far as I know, NBC filter. The firing ports do not have (and other) to be 100+ percent sealed. The overpressure inside is sufficient to prevent gases/dust and so "nbc things" from entering through the ports and other small (!) holes. But, a flat rubber seal is at the firing ports, if I remember correctly. Because the BTR able to swim. That would be a leak on these many firing ports a problem. Edited August 7, 2019 by Stefan Kotsch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolas93TS Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 So, if I understand correctly, BTR-60PB would have a very limited if null protection in NBC conditions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Kotsch Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Yes. Only protection against radioactive dust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interlinked Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 I think what he meant is that the firing ports do not maintain a proper seal when they are opened, unlike the firing ports in the BMP-1/2 and BTR-80 which have adaptors that fit over the barrel of an AK. This type can be used even in a contaminated environment, but of course, the barrel and muzzle of the rifle will become contaminated since it's on the outside... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Kotsch Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Shooting through the ports has always been a controversial issue. How do we imagine a BTR in the contaminated area and who will shoot out there on the BTR? And of course, the commanders could well choose whether to order BTR or BMP in to nuke zero point. Tracked vehicles were always the first choice for "Ascension Commands". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now