Simon Tan 0 Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 Having nothing nice to say, I say nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gavin-Phillips 0 Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 The LSW was briefly reintroduced as a DMR - its replacement is the L129A1 DMR (an LMT 7.52x51 AR). The L7 replaces two Minimi Paras, which replaced two LSWs, which replaced one L7 As for an LMG with a capacity the same as the standard rifle, the USMC seem to be OK with it having replaced the M249 with the M27. A new idea becomes an old idea which then is released as a new idea again! Thanks for the information, Chris. I'd be interested to know just how well the LSW actually performed in a DMR role? The L7 looks a fairly substantial and heavy piece of kit to lug around the battlefield. Its a shame the Minimi Para couldn't have been rechambered for a 7.62mm round? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Adam_S 0 Posted November 21, 2018 Report Share Posted November 21, 2018 Nice to see that after coming up against those pesky Boers, they've finally decided they need something with a bit more range. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon Tan 0 Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 Mk48...aka Maximi. Disposable receivers. PK just betterer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sunday 0 Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 Mk48...aka Maximi. Disposable receivers. PK just betterer. This? https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/02/16/hands-polish-zmt-ukm-2000/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon Tan 0 Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 Regular PK. Push through links are just less reliable as far as the action stroke. That is why PK can be light and reliable. Use pull out links when possible. PK is going to be a science project some day. I have my cunning plan already. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Panzermann 0 Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 Regular PK. Push through links are just less reliable as far as the action stroke. That is why PK can be light and reliable. Use pull out links when possible.PK is going to be a science project some day. I have my cunning plan already. But even in .308 a PK is more durable than a Minimi or Maximi. How is durability with the south african SS-77 and its derivatives or the israeli Negev MG? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bojan 0 Posted November 22, 2018 Report Share Posted November 22, 2018 Bulgarian 7.62x51 PKM still uses pull-push. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon Tan 0 Posted November 23, 2018 Report Share Posted November 23, 2018 (edited) Have HKMod connectors shoved down your throat is why Britain is fail. Edited November 23, 2018 by Simon Tan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Panzermann 0 Posted November 23, 2018 Report Share Posted November 23, 2018 (edited) When the customer does not ask for something else of course H&K sells their own mounting system. Vendor lock-in and all that. Bulgarian 7.62x51 PKM still uses pull-push. Does it? edit: it does, but needs a different belt. I think the Arsenal MG M2 takes M13 and DM1 link belts. Adn thus must have been converted to push through. The MG1M is only offered in three line cartridge on the Arsenal website. http://www.arsenal-bg.com/c/machine-guns-26http://www.arsenal-bg.com/c/machine-guns-26/762x51-mm-mg-m2-56 Edited November 23, 2018 by Panzermann Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bojan 0 Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 (edited) There is also a Serbian mod that keeps pull-push and uses NATO standard belts.http://www.nbinat.rs/index.php/service/service-m84 Edited November 24, 2018 by bojan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon Tan 0 Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 Interesting. This uses the force of recoil stroke to run the cartridge back over the rear detent. Kalatch tractor style. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Panzermann 0 Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 There is also a Serbian mod that keeps pull-push and uses NATO standard belts.http://www.nbinat.rs/index.php/service/service-m84 Oh, that in a PKT like form and I want that in my Leo2 (one can dream) Interesting that they have given up on the filled out stocks and use the typical PK stock with the cutout. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bojan 0 Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 They are private company and use whatever someone requires.They cooperated with Slovenian company Arex in "Rex Zero" pistol, but than again both companies were practically made by former Zastava people. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon Tan 0 Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 I guessed that was the case. Can they get traction domestically? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bojan 0 Posted November 24, 2018 Report Share Posted November 24, 2018 (edited) Very doubtful, not enough bribes involved. PS. They make aluminium AK receiver (with internal steel reinforcements) as Zastava planned but still did not make for a "modular rifle M17" project. Edited November 24, 2018 by bojan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simon Tan 0 Posted November 25, 2018 Report Share Posted November 25, 2018 Stop stealing my plans! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sunday 0 Posted November 25, 2018 Report Share Posted November 25, 2018 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Panzermann 0 Posted November 25, 2018 Report Share Posted November 25, 2018 Great minds think alike? (I for one would start with the SIG SG55x as a starting point) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.