More Chieftain's Hatchiness

[Rickard N]

How lovely it is to see these without background music

 

/R

[DKTanker]

How lovely it is to see these without background music

 

/R

+10

[shep854]

I'm weird. I like the background music. I was a bit surprised that the armor was that thin.

Edited September 3, 2018 by shep854

[DogDodger]

I'll always have a soft spot for the M41, as there was one in a local park when I was a kid. I have great memories of climbing on it (and sometimes trying not to get stung...).

[Colin]

It really says "Tank" to you when you look at it.

[Stefan Fredriksson]

Agreed. No background music is better.

[Rickard N]

I'm weird. I like the background music. I was a bit surprised that the armor was that thin.

I general I have no problem either, sometimes it's mixed so that the music is as loud or louder than the Chieftain himself...

 

/R

[JasonJ]

No brief interruptions of game tank logo either.

[shep854]

What we've been waiting for! Nick goes inside:

[shep854]

[Markus Becker]

You beat me to it.

[shep854]

He fits!

[wendist]

Probably the easiest climb onto a tank he has ever had.

[Manic Moran]

Watch my Object 416 video....

[Markus Becker]

He fits!

The only explanation is that it's "bigger on the inside".

[Adam_S]

I was sort of expecting his feet to come out of the bottom like the cars on the Flintstones.

 

When can we expect the Tetrach "oh bugger the tank is on fire" test then?

[shep854]

As his channel grows, fewer people seem interested in the vehicles themselves and more in Nicks contortionism.

[Mikel2]

As his channel grows, fewer people seem interested in the vehicles themselves and more in Nicks contortionism.

Suggestion for next video?

 

[wendist]

Watch my Object 416 video....

Just watched it and yes, that looked even easier.

[DougRichards]

I was sort of expecting his feet to come out of the bottom like the cars on the Flintstones.

 

When can we expect the Tetrach "oh bugger the tank is on fire" test then?

 

You are showing your age

[Interlinked]

I'm still waiting for a review of the T-72! And no, it's not that I want Nick to suffer. I'm just interested in the tank

[bojan]

Other than a driver's position it was OK for me, and I am 196cm tall.

[shep854]

The Object 416 video also got me to wondering--is there a 'too low' for AFVs?

[Panzermann]

Other than a driver's position it was OK for me, and I am 196cm tall.

 

I am 191 centimetres and it was okay on the gunner and TC seats. The driver was uncomfortable. It was an ex-NVA one, so the modernized ones with the added screens and optics and stuff on the inside may not be as comfortable anymore.

 

 

the T-64-73-80-90-84 are so low, because there is no need to have space for a standing loader. simple as that.

Edited October 13, 2018 by Panzermann

[Interlinked]

What are the deficiencies of the driver's station? I heard from my friend (6'2") that you can put your legs perfectly straight in there and the headroom was more than enough. The bucket seats was also very comfortable, according to him. Perhaps the location of the pedals takes some of that legroom away?

Edited October 13, 2018 by Interlinked