Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Mr King said:

 

You can put away your pitchforks.  As best I can tell these comments go all the way back to 17Feb.  That's after the oral arguments in front of SCOTUS over Trump being on several state ballots and before SCOTUS came out with their ruling.  Between that ruing and some legislation Raskin tried to push (and failing to get it through) addressing insurrection the law is pretty clear and there doesn't seem to be any reason to think this 'plan' is a thing as implied in the clip above.

  • Replies 34k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Stuart Galbraith

    3196

  • rmgill

    3012

  • DKTanker

    2015

  • Murph

    1891

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
5 minutes ago, Skywalkre said:

You can put away your pitchforks.  As best I can tell these comments go all the way back to 17Feb.  That's after the oral arguments in front of SCOTUS over Trump being on several state ballots and before SCOTUS came out with their ruling.  Between that ruing and some legislation Raskin tried to push (and failing to get it through) addressing insurrection the law is pretty clear and there doesn't seem to be any reason to think this 'plan' is a thing as implied in the clip above.

They moved on to plan B, since that didn't work, whats plan C going to be?

GSb-Vbk2-Ws-AAzkx8.jpg

 

Posted

Who needs security?

Posted
17 hours ago, Mr King said:

They moved on to plan B, since that didn't work, whats plan C going to be?

GSb-Vbk2-Ws-AAzkx8.jpg

 

You'd think, considering Blackrock and all the other actors behind the curtains have their paws in everything, that they would have picked a better sleeper agent than some kid who couldn't even make his high school rifle team...

Posted

That's a logical thought, so what makes you think he's not simply the patsy to get graped by the "good guys" and close off that storyline?  S/F...Ken M

Posted
6 hours ago, EchoFiveMike said:

That's a logical thought, so what makes you think he's not simply the patsy to get graped by the "good guys" and close off that storyline?  S/F...Ken M

The MAGA crowd is desperate for one of these borderline conspiracy theories to be true (so many still cling to the 'stolen' election, FFS).  There are so many hands in the jar of this investigation and despite what folks on here claim there are plenty of MAGA-sympathetic individuals in the various agencies investigating this (coupled to Rs on the Hill with subpoena power and the bully pulpit).  Good luck keeping a secret in that environment that's vastly different than official sources are saying.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Skywalkre said:

The MAGA crowd is desperate for one of these borderline conspiracy theories to be true (so many still cling to the 'stolen' election, FFS). 

Which stolen election?

 

  1. The one with the conspiracy of hanging chads / and Supreme Court?
  2. The one with the conspiracy of Russian collusion / piss tapes/ and $50,000 of facebook ads?
  3. The one with the conspiracy between the establishment, and folks like big tech who then colluded with the government to censore all discussion of the possibility of a stolen election in the immediate aftermath?
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr King said:

Which stolen election?

The one Trump keeps talking about - the notion there was widespread fraud back in '20 that resulted in a Biden win.

Posted
1 minute ago, Skywalkre said:

The one Trump keeps talking about - the notion there was widespread fraud back in '20 that resulted in a Biden win.

As opposed to the establishment and their media lap dogs still putting forth the narrative that trump conspired with the Russians to steal the 2020 election.

Posted

You mean 2016 election?  Since that report came out a year ago I can't recall ever hearing anything about it.  But yeah, that's totally comparable to the constant comments by Trump and his supporters (such as the thread Murph keeps posting to here on TN) about 2020... 🙄

Posted (edited)

Oh. Yes. The comments by folks on the forum far outweigh anything that CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS & BBC amplified about pee dossiers, Russian spies and the like in 2016-2020. To say nothing of the minuscule efforts by the CIA experts and their effect in 2020. Or then twitter shutting down the postings of the New York Post. 

Edited by rmgill
Posted
7 hours ago, rmgill said:

Oh. Yes. The comments by folks on the forum far outweigh anything that CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS & BBC amplified about pee dossiers, Russian spies and the like in 2016-2020. To say nothing of the minuscule efforts by the CIA experts and their effect in 2020. Or then twitter shutting down the postings of the New York Post. 

There was also a "whistle blower" in the white house, and when it came out he was CIA, big tech conspired with the government to shut down and censor all discussion on social media of who he was. Big tech also conspired with the government to shut down and censor all discussion on social media of covid / vax that strayed from the official narratives that were clearly false and have been proven so since then. Then there was the very very convenient timing of covid. The same covid which went on to kill millions across the globe. The same covid which has since been revealed to have been engineered in a lab.

 

But clearly the problem is the evil maga

 

Posted

https://apnews.com/article/iran-pakistan-murderforhire-trump-justice-department-5a3abe0895ae7c2be14f89fc4e49bc53
 

Quote

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Pakistani man alleged to have ties to Iran has been charged in a plot to carry out political assassinations on U.S. soil, including potentially of former President Donald Trump.

The case disclosed by the Justice Department on Tuesday comes two years after officials disrupted a separate scheme that they said was aimed at former Trump administration national security adviser John Bolton.

Asif Merchant traveled to New York in June for the purpose of meeting with men he thought he was recruiting to carry out the killings, even paying a $5,000 advance to two would-be assassins who were actually undercover law enforcement officers, federal officials said. He was arrested in July as he prepared to leave the United States, after having told the men that he would provide further instructions, including the names of the intended targets, in August or September after he returned to Pakistan.

 

 

Posted

Apparently the US Dept of Justice knew about the plot in April. Correlate that with USSS refusal to provide adequate security for Trump.

Posted

Per expert opinion here on TN grand juries are full of smart folks asking tough questions.

Quote

Arizona prosecutors asked grand jurors not to indict Trump in fake electors case, court records show

The Arizona grand jury that indicted 18 Republican supporters of former President Donald Trump who falsely claimed he won the state in the 2020 election wanted to consider also charging Trump, but prosecutors urged them not to, according to court documents filed this week.

...

As grand jurors were considering possible charges, a prosecutor asked them not to indict Trump, citing a U.S. Justice Department policy that limits the prosecution of someone for the same crime twice, and making a PowerPoint presentation on that policy. The prosecutor, who isn't identified in the records, also didn't know whether authorities had all the evidence they would need to charge Trump at that time.

"I know that may be disappointing to some of you," the prosecutor said. "I understand."

Ultimately, the grand jury indicted 18 people on forgery, fraud and conspiracy charges, including the 11 Republicans who submitted a document falsely claiming Trump had won Arizona, five lawyers connected to Trump and two former Trump aides.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/arizona-prosecutors-asked-grand-jurors-not-to-indict-trump-fake-electors-case/

Posted
On 7/29/2024 at 11:04 AM, sunday said:

I thought that the independence of Catholic Belgium from the Protestant Netherlands, and the subsequent establishment of a Parliamentary Monarchy was enough to show that Laicism is not a must for having a functioning democratic form of government.

Belgium has "proven" in more recent times that it runs just fine for years without an incumbent government. Do you recommend that as a shining example, too?

Posted
13 hours ago, sunday said:

I feel the twit post in question has some interest:

 

Some busy body in the EU, interfering in UK politics after we left them?

How outrageous.

Posted
8 minutes ago, DB said:

Belgium has "proven" in more recent times that it runs just fine for years without an incumbent government. Do you recommend that as a shining example, too?

Things were a bit different in the 1830s.

Posted
8 minutes ago, DB said:

Some busy body in the EU, interfering in UK politics after we left them?

How outrageous.

Now, in USA politics, perhaps Venezuela politics in some years, once some Fascist or other replaces Maduro, the darling of Eurocrats.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...