lucklucky Posted October 6, 2023 Posted October 6, 2023 (edited) Not directly related but for the value of "consensus"... Ozone Hole is one of the BIGGEST on record https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12596861/Ozone-Hole-one-BIGGEST-record-Gap-Antarctica-three-times-size-Brazil-larger.html Edited October 6, 2023 by lucklucky
lucklucky Posted October 11, 2023 Posted October 11, 2023 Consequences of Ulez London system forcing people to use the underground Quote Parts of the Underground suffer from serious air pollution, discovered following research in 2019 sponsored by the Financial Times. According to the newspaper, the deep Tube is by far the most polluted part of the city because of considerable particulate pollution from metal friction, clothing fibre, and dust in general trapped in the tunnels. And there is a lot of it. Using hundreds of measurements inside carriages within Zone 1, dangerously high levels of pollution were found, particularly on the deeper lines. All the deep lines (Piccadilly, Jubilee, Bakerloo, Northern, Victoria and Central) had particulate PM2.5 levels at least five times higher than the World Health Organization’s safe limit and much higher than average levels on the surface, (generally less than PM1.0) particularly in outer London. https://www.samizdata.net
TrustMe Posted October 11, 2023 Posted October 11, 2023 I didn't believe anything about climit change. Now I vote for the Green party https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-67078674
sunday Posted October 11, 2023 Posted October 11, 2023 3 hours ago, TrustMe said: I didn't believe anything about climit change. Now I vote for the Green party https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-67078674 well, there are worse reasons...
JWB Posted October 16, 2023 Posted October 16, 2023 Settled Science Shock: Earth Temperatures Rise AHEAD of CO2 Emissions, Say Scientists https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/08/settled-science-shock-earth-temperatures-rise-ahead-of-co2-emissions-say-scientists/?fbclid=IwAR2zEDWttOL4gl-Z8OYgydml8cbZ5duj9MspooeGLAKTflzorbGpfyjR3V4
Tim Sielbeck Posted October 16, 2023 Posted October 16, 2023 7 hours ago, JWB said: Earth Temperatures Rise AHEAD of CO2 Emissions... Been hearing that for more than a few years.
sunday Posted October 17, 2023 Posted October 17, 2023 6 hours ago, Tim Sielbeck said: Been hearing that for more than a few years. Indeed. MIT's Richard Lindzen, for instance, was stating that. https://www.epw.senate.gov/105th/lind0710.htm https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-committees/energy-and-climate-change/Professor-Richard-Lindzen-IPC0047.pdf https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/12/04/mit-climate-scientist-dr-richard-lindzen-rejects-climate-change-as-a-quasi-religious-movement-predicated-on-an-absurd-scientific-narrative/
lucklucky Posted October 18, 2023 Posted October 18, 2023 Greta fights against Green Colonialism - i wonder if this should not be in Culture Wars. Quote The turbines sit on the land of a semi-nomadic indigenous people, the Sámi, whose at least 70,000 members mostly live in Norway, but also inhabit Sweden, Finland and the Kola Peninsula in the Russian Federation. At issue are the Sámi ancestral lands and the pastures of reindeer herders. For Greta, their rights, and those of indigenous peoples everywhere, trump humanity’s need for electricity – even if that electricity is green. In this case, the Fosen Vind development is held to have broken national and international law by erecting the turbines, and by building 131km of connecting roads and power lines. Its actions, critics say, ‘have destroyed winter pastures and migration routes crucial for maintaining sustainable reindeer herding’. And so Fosen Vind is held up by activists as an example of ‘green colonialism’. https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/10/17/why-is-greta-protesting-against-a-wind-farm/
Ssnake Posted October 18, 2023 Posted October 18, 2023 It isn't about climate, it's about taking control of our economies by weaponizing morality.
Tim Sielbeck Posted October 18, 2023 Posted October 18, 2023 (edited) Edited October 18, 2023 by Tim Sielbeck
lucklucky Posted October 22, 2023 Posted October 22, 2023 (edited) This seems to be the first institutional paper that goes against CO2 drives temperatures. “the results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.” From Statistics Norway - the Official Statistics Office of Norway https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/ https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.pdf Edited October 22, 2023 by lucklucky
sunday Posted October 22, 2023 Posted October 22, 2023 27 minutes ago, lucklucky said: This seems to the first institutional paper that goes against CO2 drives temperatures. From Statistics Norway - the Official Statistics Office of Norway https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/ https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.pdf Looks like a piece of good news. Let's see if the SJWs in power would cut the head of those uppity statisticians.
Ivanhoe Posted October 22, 2023 Posted October 22, 2023 4 hours ago, lucklucky said: This seems to be the first institutional paper that goes against CO2 drives temperatures. Math is racist. Especially algebra.
NickM Posted November 6, 2023 Posted November 6, 2023 (edited) I cannot show any examples (mostly due to my personal distaste), but on Y/T I have noticed a couple of new adds: Something by a group called 'Climate Moms or Science Moms' and another one by, I think it's called, 'Climate Equity; both show storms and fires and droughts and of course the EEEEVUL oil execs talking about their EEEVUL profits. Anyway, something MUST be in the offing: I can neither bypass nor can I mute these ads. EDIT: It's called Committee for Climate Integrity and they opine Oil Company Exec Greed is fueling climate change. Edited November 19, 2023 by NickM
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now