Jump to content

Don't Go Being Politically Insane You Climate Change Skeptics


Recommended Posts

Posted

True. But if the water is deposited as snow, or it manifests more as more cloud cover it has a negative return on heat input. 

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
2 hours ago, lucklucky said:

Instead scientists said that Maldives, New York  already be under water...

TBH, the NYSE is a bit under water lately...

 

Posted
2 hours ago, MiloMorai said:

At this time of year?

 

https://www.weather.gov/buf/lake1415_stormb.html

     "The epic November 17-19th 2014 lake effect event will be remembered as one of the most significant winter events in Buffalo’s snowy history.  Over 5 feet of snow fell over areas just east of Buffalo, with mere inches a few miles away to the north.   There were 13 fatalities with this storm, hundreds of major roof collapses and structural failures, 1000s of stranded motorists, and scattered food and gas shortages due to impassable roads.  Numerous trees also gave way due to the weight of the snow, causing isolated power outages.  While this storm was impressive on its own, a second lake effect event on Nov-19-20 dropped another 1-4 feet of snow over nearly the same area and compounded rescue and recovery efforts.  Storm totals from the two storms peaked at nearly 7 feet, with many areas buried under 3-4 feet of dense snowpack by the end of the event..."

 

https://www.currentresults.com/Yearly-Weather/USA/NY/Buffalo/extreme-annual-buffalo-snowfall.php

Highest daily snowfall recorded at Buffalo each year
Inches              Date         Centi­metres

10.2    November 25, 2005    25.9

24.9    November 20, 2000    63.2

19.0    November 30, 1976    48.3

14.1    November 30, 1960    35.8

13.2    November 29, 1955    33.5

10.3    November 07, 1953    26.2

10.3    November 27, 1952    26.2

16.1    November 16, 1949    40.9

10.1    November 12, 1932    25.7

14.4    November 17, 1920    36.6

Posted
10 hours ago, lucklucky said:

So?

Strange that from 1893, the amount of snowfall levels were pretty consistent except for the odd blip in 1936, 1976, 1982-5, 1995, 2000, 2001 and 2020 when there was major dumps (over 18"). It looks like these major dumps are increasing from 1976. Climate change people say that storms will get more sever and happen more often.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, MiloMorai said:

Strange that from 1893, the amount of snowfall levels were pretty consistent except for the odd blip in 1936, 1976, 1982-5, 1995, 2000, 2001 and 2020 when there was major dumps (over 18"). It looks like these major dumps are increasing from 1976. Climate change people say that storms will get more sever and happen more often.

 

So where's your long term data for storms over the North American Continent? Lets see the data for 500 years ago. 

Posted

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/11/17/flashback-founder-of-climate-group-vandalizing-famous-paintings-said-holocaust-was-normal-event/

Quote

 

Roger Hallam — the founder of Just Stop Oil, a far-left British climate activist organization — once downplayed the Holocaust as a “normal event” and said climate change was a more serious threat.

Hallam, who also founded the climate group Extinction Rebellion, said in 2019 that there were many other instances of cruelty in human history besides the Holocaust, in an interview at the time with German media outlet Die Zeit, according to The Guardian. After facing widespread criticism for the comments, Hallam noted the climate crisis was another Holocaust on a “far greater scale.”

“They went to the Congo in the late 19th century and decimated it,” he continued. “[The Holocaust was] almost a normal event. Just another f—ery in human history.”

 

 

Posted

Patrick Moore on Earth needing more CO2

Quote

Patrick Moore is a founding member and past president of Greenpeace.

He no longer supports the organisation and its devolution into a champagne socialist anti-humanity woke brigade.

Patrick is a scientist with over 30 years of environmental research and peer-reviewed papers behind him, although many groups have since attempted to discredit him because he rejects the “scientific consensus“.

When it comes to climate change, he knows more than most people, which is why Greenpeace has removed his name from its “founding members” list and claims that he was never a founding member.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...