Stuart Galbraith Posted October 3 Posted October 3 Ah, Budweisergrad. Yes, I think all Europe can get behind that idea.
Stefan Kotsch Posted October 3 Posted October 3 9 hours ago, Stuart Galbraith said: Ah, Budweisergrad. I suggest: Plzeňskýgrad. 😊 (My favorite is the Staropramen Premium. 👍)
Josh Posted October 3 Posted October 3 I rather doubt anyone wants to open that can of worms. Though I suspect in the event of a NATO-Russo war, Kaliningrad is plastered with Polish artillery and airstrikes on day 1.
Mike1158 Posted October 3 Posted October 3 A variation on one of these perhaps? Category: Dark & Decadent | The Garden
Stuart Galbraith Posted October 4 Posted October 4 12 hours ago, Josh said: I rather doubt anyone wants to open that can of worms. Though I suspect in the event of a NATO-Russo war, Kaliningrad is plastered with Polish artillery and airstrikes on day 1. It would have to be taken and occupied in such a situation. They still retaining nuclear weapons stockpiles there, one of them in an old Prussian force that was used for SS-22 warheads during the cold war. Its the same logic that Informed Kennedy's airstrikes posture on Cuba, if they bombed it, they had to occupy it, because no way would an airstrike get all the weapons.
Markus Becker Posted October 5 Posted October 5 (edited) On 10/3/2025 at 11:20 AM, urbanoid said: It's already been decided by the internet long ago that it's going to be Czech, Poland expects economic benefits from Beer Stream 1 and Beer Stream 2 going from Czechia to Kralovec via Poland, to be exported worldwide using the beer terminals there. That came close to costing me one. With the political situation in CZ you guys might have to add it to Poland. The name should be Kormoran Gora OK, they don't live in the mountains but there are none anyway and that's a good local beer from Masuria. Edited October 5 by Markus Becker
Ivanhoe Posted October 10 Posted October 10 On 10/2/2025 at 10:54 AM, JWB said: Wut??????? Ya'll don't know about the Molotovski-Ribbenowitz Pact.
Markus Becker Posted November 17 Posted November 17 There was an explosion on the railway line from Warsaw to the Ukrainian border. The pictures of the damage I saw showed no obvious damage. PM Tusk is rather upset anyway.
Stuart Galbraith Posted November 17 Posted November 17 As pointed out on the NATO thread, there was several incidents, with various things such as chains left on the track, even a screwed down metal plate, which presumably wouldnt trip the track circuit. Sounds for the most part unsophisticated, although that may be less an indicator of state involvement, than the employment of local criminals. Pretty disgusted the international media hasnt noticed how dangerous this is. You only have to have single train full of passengers fall off the track, and we likely are in a war.
sunday Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Some Polish joker publicly thanked someone for blowing up a gas pipeline. Good for the geese, good for the gander.
Stuart Galbraith Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Oh, and about those drones. The narrative they were all decoys turns out to be a fibre.
Markus Becker Posted November 17 Posted November 17 The announcement comes a bit late, even though I think it's correct but a two months delay is a bad PR move.
Stuart Galbraith Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Photograph shows a detonator wire. I suppose you can read it both ways, either they wanted to blow it up under a train, or makesure it didn't go off under one.
JWB Posted November 18 Posted November 18 Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced this morning that they have identified the two suspects in yesterday’s sabotage of several sections of crucial rail line in Poland, with at least one attempt successfully blowing up a rail section using C4, as a pair of Ukrainian nationals long since linked to intelligence services in Russia. https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1990803807157031043
Stuart Galbraith Posted November 18 Posted November 18 And this is why I still cant reject the possiblity that Nordstream was a Russian false flag. Because it has been and Is precisely what they do.
Sinistar Posted November 18 Posted November 18 (edited) even the west tended to drop that angle instead of showing all of its evidence after the investigations wrapped up if russia had done that then leaders or the media in the west would be showing that all over the place in order to whip their public up to prepare to confront russia instead you see the story sort of quietly disappear except to implicate some random unconnected ukrainian individuals it was not the russians who blamed someone from ukraine that came from the west - more or less the official explanation so the russian false flag story makes little sense because the west which evidently knew what happened seemed to point it at something or someone else - which is to say pointed at ukraine- which in itself would raise questions about whether ukraine had done this to its own patron giving them money and resources and equipment and paying them back this way - unless that was deliberate under the direction from washington and / or nato / and or kyiv if they had the evidence that russia had done it then it makes no sense to send signals about ukraine you would just come out and show how russia had done it instead of this circuitous connection to a supposed partner or ally or implicate ukraine in some odd way but it is part of the odd character of the propaganda war of this whole show Edited November 18 by Sinistar
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now