Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It has been 19yrs since I'd left Singapore to live abroad. 19yrs since I'd served in uniform as a reservist.

 

1983 - 1985 Full time National Service S2 Branch Infantry Brigade

1987 - 1997 Reservist Rifleman.

 

Here's my attempt at recording of what this little army that has never fought a war is made up of.

 

Some of the stuff from my time are still in use. Many are phased out.

 

72,000 (active, including 35000 conscripts)
350000+ (reserve)

(numbers probably exaggerated)

 

We are a well-equipped force in SE Asia.

 

This record include stuff that are since obsolete (like me), foreign bought stuff, stuff that we developed ourselves, some built under-license, some locally-modified.

 

It is surprising that along with China, Japan, S Korea, N Korea, we are one of the most well-developed arms manufacturers in Asia. (I'm sure India makes a lot of stuff too but they make shite most of the time.)

 

It would appear our "defense" industry has been trying to carve out a niche by creating lightweight, small-sized, simple, cheap but effective stuff. As opposed to overly large, overly high-tech, expensive super duper stuff.

 

The industry learned its craft in the last 40 years by building M16 under license, repairing and upgrading obsolete tanks.

Edited by chino
  • Replies 251
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

The Bionix Family

Over 700 vehicles

(locally-developed)

Operational since 1997 till today

 

Trialed by US Army but rejected in favour of what is now the Stryker.

Fits into the C-130.

 

Bionix I 25mm Bushmaster (made 1997 to 2001)

 

 

Bionix 40/50

 

Bionix I 25mm & 40/50

 

 

 

Bionix II 30mm Bushmaster

 

 

Bionix ARV

Bionix_ARV.jpg

 

Bionix AVLB

Bionix_AVLB.jpg

 

Bionix CMV Trailblazer (counter mine vehicle)

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

F-15SG

(Quietly expanded from 20 to 40 in service)

 

050013_RSAF_F15SG_MO_PAEI_JULY11_BANK1FS

05-0007MO.-F-15SG.-428FS.-Republic-Singa

f15-hdr-3.jpg

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

Formidable Class (derivative of French La Fayette Class Stealth Frigates)

First one built in France, the other five built locally.

 

 

The radar cones keep changing shape.

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

Primus 155 SSPH 1

(locally developed)

50 in service

 

 

4521a451fac116eb43cfa35769364c4b.jpg

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

RSAF G550 AEW

4 in service

With this level of surveillance, it is surprising we released no data about the flight path of the missing MH370. It is probably so that we don't reveal the range our surveillance reach in the region.

 

2373996_Tinhte.vn-Gulfstream-G550-AEW_5.

Edited by chino
Posted

Singapore Leopard 2SG family

About 200 vehicles including non-MBT types.

(MBT locally modified)

Posted (edited)

Submarines

They are 20 and 40yr old platforms refurbished Swedish subs.

 

4 Challenger (Sjöormen) class. (40yr-old refurbished, 2 decommissioned)

2 Archer (Västergötland) class. (20yr-old refitted with air independent propulsion for more stealth and longer submersion)

2 ThyssenKrupp Type 218SG (new, on order)

 

 

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

CIS 50MG
(Locally developed)

 

(Licensed manufacture by Indonesia)

 

10329987_707715219292666_641490604265709

2560px-thumbnail.jpg

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

20 F-16C

 

Contract signed with Lockheed to upgrade including AESA radar

 

RSAF_F-16_in_alert_fighter_taxi-ing.jpg

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

40 F-16D Block 52/52+

 

 

RSAF_F-16D_Block_52%2B_Fighting_Falcon_w

RSAF_F-16D_Block_52%2B_Fighting_Falcon_w

Edited by chino
Posted

Who are the biggest threat to Singapore and where are the most likely attach routes?

 

Most likely the land route from Malaysia like in WW2. But no clear threat from any neighbouring country anymore. More likely to be Islamic terrorism as the biggest threat just like everyone else.

Posted

Expansion of F-15SG fleet, and refitting of F-16 fleet, indicates delay in original decision to buy F-35.

Posted

The one single reason:

 

Great geographic location making us the go-to seaport crossing from Pacific, SCS to Indian Ocean.

 

If not for this, we can have the right government, policies, people etc and it could still fail, given our tiny size.

Posted

The one single reason:

 

Great geographic location making us the go-to seaport crossing from Pacific, SCS to Indian Ocean.

 

If not for this, we can have the right government, policies, people etc and it could still fail, given our tiny size.

 

Hong Kong.

Posted (edited)

Specialised Marine Craft Type ?

Stealth Naval Interceptor

Edited by chino
Posted (edited)

Type 2

(Under development)

 

Edited by chino
Posted

Singapore also gets a lot of foreign investment.

 

http://sbr.com.sg/markets-investing/news/guess-who-are-singapore%E2%80%99s-top-foreign-investors-now

 

Good use of investment is critical, to not let it go to waste.

 

Of course geography is also a factor, but saying that it is the only factor completely ignores quality of human resources. I don't think it is difficult to find other places that are at strategic locations and yet still fail in development an impressive economy, let alone a half decent one. As far as I can tell, only massive amounts of oil can make up for weak human resources in enabling a small country to becoming wealthy. High quality human resource is most critical. What would happen to Singapore if they continue their massive immigration of low skill workers? Or rather, for thought experiment, if the entire population of Singaporeans were exchanged for a full replacement of said immigrant population, would it still be reasonable to expect the economic miracle to occur? I think not.

Posted

Singapore also gets a lot of foreign investment.

 

http://sbr.com.sg/markets-investing/news/guess-who-are-singapore%E2%80%99s-top-foreign-investors-now

 

Good use of investment is critical, to not let it go to waste.

 

Of course geography is also a factor, but saying that it is the only factor completely ignores quality of human resources. I don't think it is difficult to find other places that are at strategic locations and yet still fail in development an impressive economy, let alone a half decent one. As far as I can tell, only massive amounts of oil can make up for weak human resources in enabling a small country to becoming wealthy. High quality human resource is most critical. What would happen to Singapore if they continue their massive immigration of low skill workers? Or rather, for thought experiment, if the entire population of Singaporeans were exchanged for a full replacement of said immigrant population, would it still be reasonable to expect the economic miracle to occur? I think not.

 

And massive amounts of oil are not sufficient. Look at Venezuela.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...