Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 661
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

FWIW....Malaysia started this with our Pulau Layang-Layang.


An often overlooked observation, along with the Nationalist Chinese origin of the 9-dash line and Filipinos sneaking around the SCS intent on asserting their 16th Century ancestral ownership rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Interesting take, and curiously colored glasses. If Iran is a revolutionary regime seeking to destabilise the region, doesn't that make the US a greater threat because of a well known invasion in 2003 and recent support to terrorists in Syria? Apparently is better to have Iran with nuclear weapons rather than without it, because walking away from the agreement does nothing to address those other concerns.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Published on May 11, 2018

The January protests in the streets of Tehran highlighted a set of economic and political frustrations currently felt by the Iranian people. While Iran’s government faces challenges in addressing these frustrations with domestic policy, the country’s foreign policy stance and actions have remained largely the same since the 1979 revolution. What can be identified as the key current foreign policy priorities in 2018 for Iran? And what avenues for potential reform and change are there going forward, in particular, in regards to relations with its neighbours and the US? And is the perceived prioritization of national security and self-defence over other foreign policy initiatives the largest obstacle to potential changes in Iran’s agenda?


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...



U.S. Revives Secret Program to Sabotage Iranian Missiles and Rockets

By David E. Sanger and William J. Broad



Feb. 13, 2019

WARSAW — The Trump White House has accelerated a secret American program to sabotage Iran’s missiles and rockets, according to current and former administration officials, who described it as part of an expanding campaign by the United States to undercut Tehran’s military and isolate its economy.

Officials said it was impossible to measure precisely the success of the classified program, which has never been publicly acknowledged. But in the past month alone, two Iranian attempts to launch satellites have failed within minutes.

Those two rocket failures — one that Iran announced on Jan. 15 and the other, an unacknowledged attempt, on Feb. 5 — were part of a pattern over the past 11 years. In that time, 67 percent of Iranian orbital launches have failed, an astonishingly high number compared to a 5 percent failure rate worldwide for similar space launches.

The setbacks have not deterred Iran. This week, President Hassan Rouhani singled out Tehran’s missile fleets as he vowed to “continue our path and our military power.”

The Trump administration maintains that Iran’s space program is merely a cover for its attempts to develop a ballistic missile powerful enough to send nuclear warheads flying between continents.

Hours after the Jan. 15 attempt, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo noted that Iran’s satellite launchers have technologies “virtually identical and interchangeable with those used in ballistic missiles.”

You have 2 free articles remaining.
Subscribe to The Times

Mr. Pompeo is in Warsaw this week with Vice President Mike Pence to lead a meeting of 65 nations on encouraging stability in the Middle East, including by expanding economic sanctions against Iran. It is largely an appeal to European allies who, while continuing to oppose President Trump’s decision to abandon the 2015 nuclear accord with Iran, also agree that the missile tests must stop.
President Hassan Rouhani of Iran in 2017 in Tehran at an exhibition of the country’s achievements in space technology.CreditIranian Presidency Office, via Associated Press
President Hassan Rouhani of Iran in 2017 in Tehran at an exhibition of the country’s achievements in space technology.CreditIranian Presidency Office, via Associated Press

The launch failures prompted The New York Times to seek out more than a half-dozen current and former government officials who have worked on the American sabotage program over the past dozen years. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the covert program.

The officials described a far-reaching effort, created under President George W. Bush, to slip faulty parts and materials into Iran’s aerospace supply chains. The program was active early in the Obama administration, but had eased by 2017, when Mr. Pompeo took over as the director of the C.I.A. and injected it with new resources.

Tehran is already suspicious. Even before Mr. Trump withdrew last May from the nuclear accord, Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of Iran’s missile program, accused American and allied intelligence agencies of turning their campaigns of “infiltration and sabotage” to Iran’s missile complex from its atomic infrastructure.

“They want to repeat their nuclear sabotage in the missile area,” he told Iranian state television in 2016, vowing the program will never stop “under any circumstances.”

The C.I.A. declined to comment on the sabotage efforts. Government officials asked The Times to withhold some details of its reporting, mostly involving the identities of specific suppliers to the Iranian program, because the effort is continuing.

Because there are so many things that can stymie a launch — from bad timing to bad welding to bad luck — some of Iran’s troubles, aerospace experts warned, could well be the result of normal malfunctions.
Editors’ Picks
He Committed Murder. Then He Graduated From an Elite Law School. Would You Hire Him as Your Attorney?
Julia Cameron Wants You to Do Your Morning Pages
Impose a Speed Limit on the Autobahn? Not So Fast, Many Germans Say
Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of Iran’s missile program, has said that Iran’s pursuit of missiles will never stop “under any circumstances.”CreditMahmood Hossein/Tasnim News Agency, via Wikimedia Commons
Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of Iran’s missile program, has said that Iran’s pursuit of missiles will never stop “under any circumstances.”CreditMahmood Hossein/Tasnim News Agency, via Wikimedia Commons

But the recent rise in failures suggests the effort to subvert Iran’s space launches and missile test flights, and the resulting flows of forensic information needed to lift performance, may now have intensified.

The covert actions against Iran’s missile and rocket program are being taken through countries and companies that supply Tehran’s aerospace operations. French and British officials have joined the United States in calling for ways to counter Iran’s missile program.

At the Pentagon last month to unveil a new missile defense strategy, Mr. Trump noted the Jan. 15 failed space launch. Had it succeeded, he said, it would have given Tehran “critical information” it could use “to pursue intercontinental ballistic missile capability, and a capability, actually, of reaching the United States.”
Sign Up for On Politics With Lisa Lerer

A spotlight on the people reshaping our politics. A conversation with voters across the country. And a guiding hand through the endless news cycle, telling you what you really need to know.

“We’re not going to have that happen,” Mr. Trump said.
The Iranian Target

Long before Iran got serious about producing nuclear fuel for a future weapons program, it was on the hunt for powerful missiles. The spark was its long-running fear of Iraq. In the 1980s, Saddam Hussein’s forces shot waves of missiles at Iranian cities. Hundreds of civilians died, and Iran fired back with Soviet-designed missiles it acquired from Libya, Syria and North Korea.

By the 1990s, Iran was importing a North Korean missile known as the No Dong, which it renamed the Shahab-3, or Shooting Star-3. The missile could hurl warheads about 800 miles, far enough to hit Israel. The No Dong’s powerful engine — seven feet long from nozzle to fuel pumps — eventually became the first-stage propulsion unit for most of Iran’s long-range missiles and for all of its space launchers.
A Shahab-3 missile at a military parade in 2000 in Tehran. The missile can hurl warheads about 800 miles.CreditAtta Kenare/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
A Shahab-3 missile at a military parade in 2000 in Tehran. The missile can hurl warheads about 800 miles.CreditAtta Kenare/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

After the 2003 American-led invasion of Iraq, Washington and its allies stepped up efforts to thwart Tehran’s missile and nuclear ambitions. By 2006, the United Nations Security Council demanded that Iran stop enriching uranium, a main fuel of nuclear weapons. Iran’s refusal prompted the imposition of sanctions that banned the import of parts, materials and technologies for manufacturing nuclear fuel — and for building missiles.

Under Mr. Bush, two covert programs against Iran rose in tandem: one focused on nuclear materials, the other on missiles.

The C.I.A., with help from the National Security Agency, searched for ways to subvert factories, supply chains and launchers.

It did not take much, according to officials from both the Bush and Obama administrations. Flight disruption could take no more than a small design change in a critical valve, a modest alteration in an engine part or guidance system, or a contaminated alloy for making launcher fins, crucial for aerodynamic stability.

American military officials urged Congress to put more money into programs they obliquely hailed in open testimony as “left of launch” techniques — so called because they rely on sabotaging launchers before they are fired.

In Iran’s case, that meant identifying the networks of suppliers and subcontractors who sold aerospace parts and materials to Tehran. The United Nations sanctions meant Iran also relied increasingly on black markets and shadowy middlemen — targets the C.I.A. found comparatively easy to penetrate, according to two former officials.
Targeting Iran’s Missile-Rocket Complex

For at least 12 years, American intelligence agencies have sought to subvert Iran’s supply chains for its production of missiles and space rockets. The complex relies heavily on the No Dong engine, which North Korea developed in the 1980s from a Russian design. Iran often tries to keep its launches secret, but experts say it has fired a dozen orbital rockets since 2008 — eight of which have failed. This translates into a failure rate of 67 percent, compared with a worldwide rate of 5 percent during the 2010s.

The key insight, as several participants described it, was to subvert test launches of new missiles. If the tests failed, Iran would hesitate to embark on mass production.

President Barack Obama quickened the clandestine war with disruptions aimed not only at missiles but also at a newly emerging target — space launchers.

By definition, rockets loft satellites into orbit, and missiles fire warheads though the fringes of space to hit remote targets. Mr. Obama’s first secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, held that the development and testing of one class of launcher could advance the other.

The U.S. has a system in place guarding it from intercontinental ballistic missiles. But it's by no means foolproof. Here's why.

Some rocket specialists have challenged such arguments, saying that whatever overlap exists is too small to be significant. For its part, Iran insists that its satellite launches have no military value and that it seeks no nuclear weapons.

When Mr. Pompeo arrived at the C.I.A., there was relatively little nuclear activity underway in Iran. Most of Tehran’s centrifuges had been dismantled under the 2015 agreement, and 97 percent of the country’s nuclear fuel had been shipped to Russia.

But Iran had ramped up its missile and space program. Mr. Pompeo immediately focused on the supply chain for rockets and missiles, a world he knew intimately.

He had graduated from West Point with a degree in mechanical engineering and founded, with classmates, Thayer Aerospace, named for a famous superintendent of the military academy. The company made parts for Boeing, Lockheed and Raytheon. Mr. Pompeo understood what happens when aerospace parts are produced with less than extreme precision. From 2011 to 2017, he served in Congress, including on the House Intelligence Committee.

When he got to the C.I.A., he pressed to reinvigorate the sabotage program. It was, a former official said, an obvious target.
Evidence of Manipulation

It can take years to “seed” a foreign aerospace program with faulty parts and materials. And typically, it is impossible to know if the bad technology is ever installed in particular launchers.

In one case, the United States got lucky: A short-range Iranian-made missile landed in Baghdad’s Green Zone, but failed to detonate. When experts pulled it apart, they found one of the American-sabotaged parts inside, according to a former senior official.

“Iran hides its failures and exaggerates its successes,” said Shea Cotton, a chronicler of Iranian launchings at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, based in Monterey, Calif.
Iran launched a Simorgh, a satellite-carrying rocket, in July 2017.CreditIranian Defense Ministry, via Associated Press
Iran launched a Simorgh, a satellite-carrying rocket, in July 2017.CreditIranian Defense Ministry, via Associated Press

Geography also affects learning about the repercussions. Launchings from North Korea are relatively easy for Washington to monitor because the peninsular state, about 100 miles wide at its waist, is surrounded by American bases, fleets, radars and allies. Sometimes missiles fall into the sea and are recovered by the United States or its allies.

By comparison, Iran is twice the size of Texas, and missile components can fall into its own territory. But the numbers suggest that the left-of-launch campaign against Iran has taken its toll.

Iran first succeeded in putting a small satellite into orbit in 2009, just as it was ramping up its nuclear program. It did so again in 2011, 2012 and 2015. Jonathan McDowell, a Harvard astronomer who publishes “Jonathan’s Space Report” and specializes in orbital monitoring, recently noted that those four launches were the only clear successes out of a dozen.

At least once, an Iranian rocket exploded on the launchpad, leaving damage so extensive that satellites passing overhead could make out blast scars, burned wreckage and a blackened rocket transporter. Iranian officials kept silent on that disaster, in 2012.

So far, Iran has failed to successfully test the newest generation of its satellite launcher — a bigger, more powerful rocket known as Simorgh or Phoenix. The vehicle, roughly nine stories tall, debuted in April 2016. Iran wrapped the test flight in secrecy, and sky monitors know for sure only that no satellite went into orbit.

In July 2017, another Simorgh roared off a launchpad at the Imam Khomeini Space Center, a complex east of Tehran named for the nation’s first supreme leader. Iran called it a success. But once again, no satellite was seen. Reports said Washington concluded there was a “catastrophic failure.”

In January, Mr. Pompeo warned Iran against launching a Simorgh that spy satellites had detected was in preparation. After it lifted off, on Jan. 15, Iranian officials declared it suffered what they called a third-stage failure.
The return of the classified program was ordered by Mike Pompeo in early 2017, weeks into his yearlong tenure as director of the C.I.A. He is now the secretary of state.CreditJakub Gavlak/EPA, via Shutterstock
The return of the classified program was ordered by Mike Pompeo in early 2017, weeks into his yearlong tenure as director of the C.I.A. He is now the secretary of state.CreditJakub Gavlak/EPA, via Shutterstock

“Sometimes life does not go as expected,” Iran’s minister of telecommunications, Mohammad Javad Azari Jahromi, said in a Twitter post.

Some experts attributed Iran’s poor performance to other factors, including trade embargoes that block the best technology. “It’s not a great record, but it’s not out-of-the-family, especially given the sanctions,” said Dr. McDowell, the Harvard astronomer. “It makes it harder to get parts.”

The secret American program parallels a cybersabotage effort that was aimed at North Korea, which suffered an embarrassing series of missile failures in 2016 before suspending its flight tests a year later.

North Korea has since developed solid-fueled missiles — an effort that Tehran is now racing to match. Solid fuels are not as vulnerable to covert meddling as the welters of hardware behind liquid-fueled missiles.
A Warsaw Warning

In Warsaw, Mr. Pompeo is expected to repeat his warnings about the danger of Tehran’s missile program and to press European and Arab states to expand sanctions and missile defenses aimed at Iran.

There will almost certainly be no reference to the United States’ secret sabotage efforts. But when Mr. Trump spoke at the Pentagon last month, he said nothing about Russia, China or North Korea as missile threats. He spoke only of Iran.

“Our strategy,” Mr. Trump said, “is grounded in one overriding objective: to detect and destroy every type of missile attack against any American target, whether before or after launch.”

David E. Sanger reported from Warsaw, and William J. Broad from New York.



Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) on Thursday held offensive-combat drone exercises in the Persian Gulf, involving dozens of RQ-170 stealth unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that Iran has manufactured based on a model of a US Sentinel drone it captured unharmed in 2011.



Link to post
Share on other sites


Would be fascinating to have an update on the status of Iran's ongoing F14 SLEP program, as they certainly have the motivation to fund such an effort with a blank oil revenue check.


Hey, anyone that keeps F14's flying has to have his heart in the right place financial or other trouble with acquiring new fighter jets, which also leads to other such moves, like upgrade of F-4s (including Ds), refurbishing and putting ex-Iraqi Su-22s into service (for the first time, in current decade, as they never operated them before) etc.


There, fixed

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair to them, I entirely get why they put so much effort into retaining them. There are claims that the F14 community in iran (which would largely have been shah trained) shot down in excess of 100 Iraqi aircraft. Which with the sanctions ongoing and their complete lack of parts meaning I doubt ever more than 40 of them were operational at any one time, is deeply impressive.


It also kind of explains why the Iraqi's were not sporting enough to give the Tomcats trade in the 2 Iraq wars. Every time they saw 'F14' pop up on the RWR, they RAN. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was on the Heatblur forum the other day, and someone posed the question 'What was the natural enemy of the F14 Tomcat', and some wag said 'Dick Cheney'. :D

I thought that was pretty good. :)


No, you are probably right Urbanoid, they probably wouldnt keep them in service if they had alternatives. OTOH, what alternatives are there? None of the modern alternatives, other than perhaps the Mig31, whose production has long since ended,, have anything like its capabilities. And the Russians seem to be very keen to hang onto those that they have. Su30? Maybe, though you still need a replacement for the long range missiles which still seem to be under development in Russia. In the short term there are no good replacements for its range, or its range of capabilities.

Edited by Stuart Galbraith
Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt that any AIM-54s are operational at this point. Has anyone actually photographed Iranian F-14s with ordnance? In any case, the AIM-54s effective range against a maneuvering target was well below its max range for a bomber sized aircraft. Indeed, I believe ripple firing was only possible around 50nm, at least that was the range it was tested at. For most engagements a modern medium range AAM would be superior in performance. As for replacements, the Iranian don't need a dedicated interceptor. Some kind of fighter would do fine. The F-14 is rather long ranged compared to F-16/17 but the newer F-15 and Su-27 models would superior replacements with modern AAMs and far superior radar and avionics. The fact that the Russians aren't selling them anything seems to indicate one of the main problems is money, not politics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I do have to say about the iranians, in 1980 everyone was patting themselves on the back that none of the Iranian F14's were operational, and a year later they seemingly demonstrated they had got 60 of the 79 operational, including a Phoenix missile capability. The Iranians are clearly the most supreme bullshit artists, but we have to give them credit a history of getting the most out of the aircraft, and whilst I doubt there is anything like the 60 operational they once did, I think we have to give them a bit of credit at being some ingenious bastards when they put their minds to something.


The Phoenix is a case in point. They probably dont have much of the original stock left, but they do seem to have an ability to build a 'new' version of it. Supposedly they have taken the missile airframe, reverse engineered it, and put in a seeker head from a Hawk missile that they also have reverse engineered. Im not believing they have the ability to ripple fire 6 of these, but they probably dont need to. But if it gives them a semi active capability out to 60 nautical miles or so (which is about where the Phoenix was most comfortable) then its a useful weapon.



There was an article here where they talk of extending their life out to 2030 or so, including fitting R73's (be interesting to see if they include the Helmet sight). Other reports seem to indicate they want to use the F14's bombing capability, which the USN demonstrated. Supposedly they had bomb racks delivered under the Iran contra deal, but ive no idea if they ever used them.



Its not going to be a threat to F35's, but at low level delivering bombs, or even a long range interceptor, it could still prove a handful. Assuming they have the money to upgrade it like they say, there is a claim I read the other day they only have one F14AM in service, and that the upgrade was too costly. OTOH, we have said things like that before and been disappointed.


I think they do need an interceptor personally. Look at the size of Iran, and the relative lack of missile defences. Yes, an SU30 would probably do, but long range reach is never going to go out of style.

Edited by Stuart Galbraith
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...