FALightFighter Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Yes, units tailor loads. Most patrols in Afghan didn't carry Javelin, although they were often in vehicles. And we even fielded upgraded M72 LAWs (M72A7?) because they were lighter and handier than M136 AT4s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 How "modern" are you looking for. I was going through some old stuff and realized I have a survey of mid-60s NATO infantry company TO&Es, in a Word doc. It's from a book byJac Weller called Weapons and Tactics, Hastings to Berlin, 1966. Somewhere I have similar data from his other book, same thing but for Asia in the Vietnam era, but it's not written up. Let me know if you're interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted May 7, 2016 Author Share Posted May 7, 2016 Post it, I am always interested in development of it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 (edited) Rifle companies in the early to mid-60s, more info later on weapons and drilling down to platoon and squad level Number of personnel by unit, plus the number of rifle platoons Total total Weap rifle rifle rifleCountry HQ plat plat plat companyBelgium 36 0 3 44 132 168Britain 12 24 3 32 96 132Canada 25 24 3 35 105 154Denmark 23 13 3 29 87 123France ?? ?? 3 40 120 ???Germany 16 0 4 32 128 144Greece 10 36 3 36 108 154Italy 13 24 3 29 87 124Netherlands 22 27 3 41 123 172Norway 24 40 3 41 123 187Portugal 25 58 3 34 102 185Russia 5 10 3 30 90 105Spain 36 31 4 45 180 247Turkey 10 41 3 46 138 189US Army 12 36 3 44 132 180USMC 9 53 3 47 141 203 German org is Panzer Grenadier, not “standard” infantry Edited May 7, 2016 by CaptLuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 (edited) Sorry, few notes on specific weapon types, but here they are, small arms by company by class Pax AR Rifle SMG Pistol TotalBelgium 168 18 93 42 15 168Britain 132 9 122 0 1 132Canada 154 12 118 18 5 153Denmark 123 9 72 37 5 123France ??? ??? ??? ?? ? ???Germany 144 18 109 13 22 162Greece 154 9 126 10 9 154Italy 124 12 25 78 9 124Netherlands 172 9 98 58 16 181Norway 187 9 109 45 24 187Portugal 185 9 105 45 35 194Russia 105 10 81 0 14 105Spain 247 14 148 57 42 261Turkey 189 18 129 0 36 183US Army 180 18 104 0 58 180USMC 203 27 150 0 26 203 AR = Automatic Rifle-- Denmark and Germany are MG42 on a bipod-- US and USMC are the M14A1-- France is the M1952 on a bipod-- Russia is the RPDNote that Weller makes a distinction between GPMG being primarily used on a bipod, which he lumps in with ARs, and with GPMG with a larger crew, expected to be used with a tripod. He refers to the latter as MMG and puts them in a separate count as heavy weapons. Edited May 7, 2016 by CaptLuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 (edited) heavy weapons by infantry company- HWP means in the heavy weapons platoon- RP means the total within all the rifle platoons- HQ means in the company HQ Belgium RP -- 3 60mm Mort, 6 MMG, 3 83mm RL HQ-- 2 81mm Mort, 1 .50 HMG Britain HWP – 2 84mm RR, 2 81mm Mort RP -- 3 84mm RR, 3 2” mort Canada HWP – 2 MMG, 2 81mm Mort, 2 106mm RR RP -- 3 3.5” RL HQ-- AA MGs on vehicles Denmark HWP – 3 60mm Mort, 2 3.5” RLs, 5 MG42 w/tripod RP -- 3 3.5” RL HQ-- 2 .50 HMG France HWP – ??? RP -- Several RL and MG HQ—Variable Germany RP -- About 16 AT weapons, one per APC HQ-- Extra Tripods and some MG42s in vehicles Greece HWP – 3 MMG, 3 60mm Mort Italy HWP – 2 MMG, 2 57mm RR, 2 60mm Mort RP -- 3 3.5” RLs Netherlands HWP – 3 81mm, 2 Light AT (?!) RP -- 6 84mm RR HQ-- 1 .50 HMG, 6 extra GPMG, Several light AT Norway HWP – 3 57mm RR, 3 60mm Mort, 1 3.5” RL RP -- 3 MMG, 3 3.5” RL HQ-- 1 .50 HMG, 1 3.5” RL Portugal HWP – 3 60mm Mort, 3 MG34 w/tripod RP -- 3 3.5” RL HQ-- 2 .50 HMG, 2 3.5” RL Russia HWP – 3 MMG, 1 AT weapon RP -- 9 AT weapons HQ-- Sometimes AT or AA weapons Spain HWP – 3 81mm Mort, 2 106mm RR, 2 3.5” RL RP -- 8 MMGs, 8 3.5” RL HQ-- No standard Turkey HWP – 3 81mm Mort, 3 57mm RR RP -- 6 MMG, 3 3.5” RL HQ-- 4 35” RL US Army HWP – 3 81mm Mort, 2 106mm RR, 1 3.5” RL RP -- 6 MMGs, 6 90mm RR HQ-- Several .50 HMG USMC HWP – 6 MMG, 6 3.5 RL Edited May 7, 2016 by CaptLuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 Platoon personnel counts, number of squads # Rifle Squad Platoon HQ Weapons Squads Squad Total TotalBelgium 11 0 3 11 33 44Britain 8 0 3 8 24 32Canada 5 0 3 10 30 35Denmark 5 0 3 8 24 29France 10 0 3 10 30 40Germany 8 0 3 8 24 32Greece 6 0 3 10 30 36Italy 8 0 3 7 21 29Netherlands 5 9 3 9 27 41Norway 5 9 3 9 27 41Portugal 7 0 3 9 27 34Russia 3 0 3 9 27 30Spain 3 9 3 11 33 45Turkey 2 11 3 11 33 46US Army 3 11 3 10 30 44USMC 5 0 3 14 42 47 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPMG Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 I think there are a couple of things wrong with these tables, with respect to the British Army. First there are no SMG's, the Sterling SMG were issued to many (all?) Coy HQ, (all?) Plt HQ, and the Section commander. I don't think the British have ever had a weapons Plt in their Rifle Coy, I think this table shows Mortar, and Anti-tank Plts of support Coy being split between the 3 Rifle Coys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 Weapons by platoon Pax AR Rifle SMG Pistol HeavyBelgium 44 6 26 7 5 2 MMG, 1 83mm RL, 1 60mm MortBritain 32 3 29 0 0 1 84mm RR, 1 2” mortCanada 35 3 30 1 1 1 3.5” RLDenmark 29 3 18 7 1 1 3.5” RLFrance(4) 40 3 18 18 4 4 RL, 3 MMG, 1 .50 MGGermany 32 4 26 2 4 4 Panzerfaust (5)Greece 36 3 29 3 1 Italy 29 4 8 16 1 1 3.5” RLNetherlands 41 3(6) 29 8 4 2 84mm RRNorway 41 3 27 6 5 1 3.5” RL, 1 MMGPortugal 34 3 21 8 5 1 3.5” RLRussia 30 3 26(7)1 3 3 RPG (8)Spain 45 3 34 8 3 2 3.5” RL, 2 MMGTurkey 46 6 32 0 6 1 3.5” RL, 2 MMGUS Army 44 6 28 0 10 2 90mm RR, 2 MMG, 6 GLs (9)USMC 47 9 33 0 5 3 GLs (8)Notes1. in APCs but not carried on foot2. does not include 4 MMG from the platoon APCs3. SMGs can be issued for special duty4. Includes APC weapons5. Panzerfaust6. 3 more GPMG in APCs which can be dismounted for ground use7. AK8. Organic to rifle squads, 1 each9. Organic to rifle squads, 2 each Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 Squad level: country, total people, weapons list Belgium Pers 11 One MMG (in APC, can be dismounted), 2 AR (FALO), 1 scoped FAL, 3 auto FAL, 4 semiauto only FAL, 1 SMGBritain Pers 8 One GPMG, six SLR, one 84mm RR (or 7 SLR, no RR)Canada Pers 10 One AR, 9 SLRDenmark Pers 8 One AR (MG42), 5 M1 rifle, 2 SMGFrance Pers 10 1 AR, nine rifle or smg (mix varies), one AT weaponGermany Pers 8 One MG42, 7 G3 (all full auto), one PanzerfaustGreece Pers 10 One or two BAR, 7 or 8 M1, one SMGItaly Pers 7 One BAR, 2 M1, 4 SMGNetherlands Pers 9 One AR (FN MAG or Bren), 8 rifles (M1 or FAL) or 7 rifles and one SMGNorway Pers 9 One BAR, 8 riflesPortugal Pers 9 One AR, 8 riflesRussia Pers 9 One AR (RPD), 7 AK, one RPG and one pistolSpain Pers 11 11 CETME or 1 AR and 10 CETMETurkey Pers 11 Two AR, 9 rifleUS Army Pers 10 2 AR, 6 rifle, 2 GL and 2 pistolUSMC Pers 14 3 AR, 10 Rifle, one GL, 1 pistol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 (edited) First there are no SMG's, the Sterling SMG were issued to many (all?) Coy HQ, (all?) Plt HQ, and the Section commander Not sure. I seem to have lost which line item one note belongs to, "3. SMGs can be issued for special duty" It's possible this refers to the British TO&E. I don't think the British have ever had a weapons Plt in their Rifle Coy, I think this table shows Mortar, and Anti-tank Plts of support Coy being split between the 3 Rifle Coys. I don't know, though he is certainly not including any battalion 'slice' with any of the other totals. Keep the timeline, early to mid-60s in mind. Edited May 7, 2016 by CaptLuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted May 8, 2016 Author Share Posted May 8, 2016 (edited) Yugoslavia (note that it may contain mistakes, I am not sure about everything) Light inf 1 10 men section, 5 x SMG (M56, M49 or PPSh*), 4 x Rifle (M48 or M59/66 in later part of 60s), LMG (M53/MG-42/MG-34*/ZB-26*) At least one rifle would have RG attachmentPlt is Plt HQ (3 men), 3 sections + MG section, which was 7 men, 2 x MMG (M53/MG-42/MG-34*)Co was Co HQ (5 men, including two snipers with scoped Kar98k or Mosin* rifles), 3 Plts and support Plt with mortas section (3 x 60mm mortar) and AT section (4 x AT weapon - M57/M49/M20/M9A1*) .or10 men sectionPlt is Plt HQ + 3 sections + MG/AT section (two of each)Co had HQ + 3 Plts + mortar section (3 x 60mm) *Reserves used weapons marked with asterisk Motorized inf:10 men section, 5 x SMG, 4 x rifle, LMG At least one rifle would have RG attachmentPlt is 3-men plt HQ, 3 x section, 11-men FS section (2 x MMG + 2 x AT weapon)Co had HQ (7 IIRC, including two snipers), 3 x Plt + Co Spt plt, which had RCL section with two weapons (M60/M20*), mortar section with two 81/82mm mortars and AT section with four AT weapons. Some had MMG section with 3 MMGs instead of AT section Mech inf:10 men squad, 5 x SMG, 4 x rifle (M1 Garand or M48 or M59/66), LMG, AT weapon. Another MG was mounted in APC (Pintle mount on M3 Halftrack, bow on M-60 APC) and dismounted if needed. At least one rifle would have RG attachmentPlt had 4 x section, 1st one was Plt HQ also.Co had Co HQ (5 men, including one sniper), 3 x Plt, 1 x FS Plt, which had two mortar sections (each 2 x 81/82mm mortars), two RCL sections (each 2 x RCL). When fighting from prepared positions there was also light AA section, made from half (6) .50 HMGs from APCs. Guard's inf:SMG section - 8 x SMG, 1 x rifle (grenadier), 1 x LMGRifle section - 7 x rifle, 2 x SMG, 1 x LMGSMG plt - HQ + 2 sections + MG/AT section (two of each)Rifle plt - HQ + SMG Plt + Rifle Plt + MG/AT sectionCo - HQ + 2 Plts + FS Plt - two RCL section (2 RCL each), two mortar sections (2 2 81/82mm mortars each) Edited May 19, 2017 by bojan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPMG Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 First there are no SMG's, the Sterling SMG were issued to many (all?) Coy HQ, (all?) Plt HQ, and the Section commander Not sure. I seem to have lost which line item one note belongs to, "3. SMGs can be issued for special duty" It's possible this refers to the British TO&E. I don't think the British have ever had a weapons Plt in their Rifle Coy, I think this table shows Mortar, and Anti-tank Plts of support Coy being split between the 3 Rifle Coys. I don't know, though he is certainly not including any battalion 'slice' with any of the other totals. Keep the timeline, early to mid-60s in mind. According to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia%E2%80%93Malaysia_confrontation#British%20tacticsThe British Army Infantry Battalions went to 3X Rifle Coy of 3X Rifle Plt, 1X Support Coy of 1X Mortar Plt, 1X Anti-tank Plt, 1X Assault Pioneer Plt, and 1X Reconnaissance Plt in 1962 with the end of national service. This is pretty much the same organization they used into the 1980's. Prior to that they used a modified WWII org with 4X rifle coy of 3X rifle plt, and a support coy without recon plt, but with a MG Plt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Werb Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 GPMG, at what level were the SF roled GPMGs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPMG Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 WWII SF was in Machine Gun Battalions usually one per Division.Post War Machine Gun Battalions were disbanded and Infantry Battalions got a Machine Gun Platoon in Support Coy1962 With the impending arrival of the GPMG Machine Gun Platoons were disbanded, but the Vickers Machine Guns remained available. SF kit was held at Company, to be issued to the Machine gunners in the rifle sections at need. I think the scale was 6 SF kits per Company.IIRC In theory the SF Machine Gun Platoon did not return to the Infantry Battalions until after the Falklands War, but the reason for it's return was the use of SF Machine Gun Platoons in the Falklands War. This is because the actual unit organization was decided by the Battalion Commander, and was restricted by unit manning. Usually if a battalion had a SF Machine Gun Platoon it would be manned by the drums and band personnel, but they also were used as stretcher bearers. I found this 1980's Battalion Org here http://coldwargamer.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/orbat-1980s-british-bg-part-7-infantry.html HQ Company,Supply, Motor Transport, Maintenance, Signals, Provost, Medical and Welfare functions as well as the Drums Platoon and Band. The Drums Platoon could provide 3 GPMG SF sections each consisting of 2 Guns. In addition up to 3 Snipper pairs and an Assault pioneer unit of up to 1 section could be held in the HQ company or in rifle companies or not exist depending on unit manning and the interests of key leaders. 3 Rifle Companies,Company HQ and 3 Rifle Platoons Support Weapons Company, Company HQ, Anti-Tank, Recce and Mortars. Of course on operations the Battalion would be task organized . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Werb Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Thank you. I'd wondered about this for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted May 26, 2016 Author Share Posted May 26, 2016 (edited) Well, since we lack info about modern ones, here is Israeli from 1967:Plt - 31 men, 3 HB FAL with bipod (MG34 or Bren for reserves), 24 FAL (Mauser for reserves), 4 Uzi. Their Co had light mortar section, MG section, AT section and RCL section. No idea how much of each was there... Edited September 26, 2019 by bojan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Tan Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Jeez...that sucks. 3x 10 man section (Uzi, 8xFAL, FALO). That is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rohala Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Jeez...that sucks. 3x 10 man section (Uzi, 8xFAL, FALO). That is terrible.Terrible in what sense? It was pretty standard at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted May 26, 2016 Author Share Posted May 26, 2016 No useful ranged automatic fire (FAL "SAW" was a joke), no good close range suppresion (their FALs were semi, only single Uzi per squad), no AT firepower other than rifle-grenades, no plt heavy weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Werb Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 However, it does follow current thinking that a smaller number of larger, accurately aimed projectiles makes for far better suppression than smaller ones sprayed in the general direction of the enemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted May 27, 2016 Author Share Posted May 27, 2016 Which was proven as false in every war since it was first time tried. They got MAGs back in squads ASAP after 1967. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Tan Posted May 27, 2016 Share Posted May 27, 2016 Bollicks. As usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Werb Posted May 27, 2016 Share Posted May 27, 2016 There's some pretty scientific looking stuff out there that talks about the suppression levels of different projectiles passing within different distances of a human. Page 40 in this document for example. However, I always wonder how you could ever evaluate something like this in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Tan Posted May 27, 2016 Share Posted May 27, 2016 Suppression at longer ranges is based on splash and tracer burn not near misses. Engaging man sized targets at that range without optics is hard. That is why 30 Light Rifle was garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now