Jump to content

Because, Canada


shep854

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

A farmer in northern B.C. who caught a lynx in his chicken coop on Sunday didn't react the way one might expect. He didn't grab a gun or yell at the wild animal.

Instead, Chris Paulson grabbed the lynx by the scruff of its neck, lifted it off the ground and scooped it from the coop.

Then he gave it a gentle scolding. 

"He just looked ... a bit like [a kid] with its hand in the chocolate chip bag," Paulson told CBC News from his home near Decker Lake, west of Prince George.  

"So I kind of gave him a little lecture and and then told him he shouldn't come back."

Video on link

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-farmer-captures-lynx-chicken-coop-1.5923089

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rmgill said:

He didn't truss it up with duct tape? 

What would RedGreen say? 


Good question

 

Quote

Jeff Palm, a conservation officer in nearby Burns Lake, said officials don't condone what happened.

"We don't recommend handling a lynx with  bare hands. You certainly might lose an arm," Palm told CBC News. "Lynx are wild cats and they can be ferocious."

Palm said he was surprised to hear Paulson "was able to grab it by the scruff of the neck and not end up being bitten and scratched up."

The conservation officer said while some people may think what happened was preferable to shooting and killing the lynx, "it is technically illegal to capture live wildlife and move them to a new location and can result in a fine."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the pain, suffering, and economic damage the Polar Vortex storm caused the Lower 48, isn't it time we start talking about punitive airstrikes against the Great White Peril?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ivanhoe said:

With all the pain, suffering, and economic damage the Polar Vortex storm caused the Lower 48, isn't it time we start talking about punitive airstrikes against the Great White Peril?

 

It came from Alaska thru Canada because Greenland rejected it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

How dare they make these people follow the same guidelines as everyone else follows, including other churches!  What's wrong with letting them turn themselves into plague rats and infecting other people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, R011 said:

How dare they make these people follow the same guidelines as everyone else follows, including other churches!  What's wrong with letting them turn themselves into plague rats and infecting other people?

Regardless of the specific issue, "your worldly laws don't apply to our religious community" is a somewhat uneasy proposition. Even before we come to Muslims or Orthodox Jews running their parallel legal systems, parishes over here sometimes invoke the ancient tradition of "church asylum" to shield rejected asylum seekers from deportation. Which would be fine by me if they took over complete care for them, since capacity is obviously limited vis-a-vis total numbers.

Unfortunately the shelter is frequently not limited to actual sacred ground rather than extended to any property owned by clerical institutions, upkeep is of course still paid by public authorities as long as the fugitives remain in the country, and the aim usually just is to outwait the period inside which people must be returned to the Schengen country which they fist entered under the Dublin Agreements, after which Germany becomes responsible and must start proceedings anew.

Religious celebrations have actually turned into COVID superspreader events in Germany - notably a couple services by evangelical churches with much singing in Frankfurt and Bremen, a Catholic priest who infected people in several congregations in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Muslim fast-breaking gatherings, Turkish weddings, etc.

Edited by BansheeOne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both parties are being stupid with 51% the government, the remainder the church. I don't know the specifics, nor the specific laws but I am wondering if:

1. Allow the congregation in the church with masks and social distancing?

2. Allow attending said church in the parking lot with the parishioners remaining in their cars?

3. Sending one higher authority official to meet with the minister beforehand to discuss the situation and allow a compromise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rick said:

Sending one higher authority official to meet with the minister beforehand to discuss the situation and allow a compromise. 

Yeah, that's what sensible people would do, if both parties act in good faith. But you never know who is actually responsible for the failure of communication. Is it state officialy who want to escalate to have a warning example, or is it the minister who sees an opportunity to get into headlines?

The video commentary covering the situation does not suggest that the Christian community is interested in an amiable solution. "Here come the shock troops" "wearing gas masks" ... all I can see are some elevated body mass index cops deploying in sufficient number to cordon the area, wearing FFP2 masks as a reasonable precaution. Those "citizen reporters" do not help their case with hyperbolic voice-overs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If masks permit the police to gather within six feet of each other, what's the problem with the people doing the same?

This nonsense happens in the US too with jews attending funerals "superspreader events" yet this is not, medical experts agree, because it's for a good cause. 

 

So people are rightly pissed.  It's the very definition of gaslighting.

Edited by Burncycle360
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't cordon an area if the police are supposed to stay six feet from each other. Trying to turn that into an argument that Covid countermeasures are bogus means debating in bad faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rick said:

Both parties are being stupid with 51% the government, the remainder the church. I don't know the specifics, nor the specific laws but I am wondering if:

1. Allow the congregation in the church with masks and social distancing?

2. Allow attending said church in the parking lot with the parishioners remaining in their cars?

3. Sending one higher authority official to meet with the minister beforehand to discuss the situation and allow a compromise. 

Not the first time, Edmonton-area pastor arrested, charged after repeatedly ignoring COVID-19 rules | Globalnews.ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MiloMorai said:

Have the appropriate authorities treated this church different than any other organization where people gather?

In California, the state did so and said regulations against the church was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rick said:

Have the appropriate authorities treated this church different than any other organization where people gather?

In California, the state did so and said regulations against the church was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

There was trouble with a church in Aylmer ON.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...