Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Two pictures surfaced of one of the unmarked MiG-29s during their stopover in Syria. It is not one of the later models, the hump backed MiG-29SMT, but an earlier model, probably the MiG-29S.

 

UURnNya.jpg

 

U92xUS0.jpg

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Straight out of MIG-29S Squadron 4, Nowheresville, Russia.

 

I got another problem here. I've got to send someone from this squadron to Libya. I've got to do something here, I still can't believe it...

Posted

I think they person the Russians are playing chicken with is 'Just The Tayyip', not the West. If anyone is going to overtly react to Russian jets being present, it will be the Turks. I would assume drones would be used if the Turks went that way, but F-16's could easily stage out that far with in flight refueling or a light load.

I think you are missing time factor: arranging the deal with sponsors (probably UAE is paying the bills), preparing the planes (i would not be surprised if they are from dozens of Mig-29th abandoned by Ukrainian AF in Crimea as they were unable to fix them - but Russian plants can, especially for this one-way deployment), finding pilots (probably also from Eastern Europe or Ukraine), arranging all details - how long ago it all started? Quite likely the planes were planned to arrive right in time to became victorious LNA new national aviation (as LNA was advancing quite well back then).. Also i can't rule out Turks somehow were aware of it (or even informed of it) making them rush to deploy armor and Syrian rebel forces to Libya, abandoning efforts in Idlib - as result NATO's second strongest army and Russia regional competitor now bogged down in civil war overseas while de-facto loosing positions in convenient conflict next to its border. Desert war in Libya may last decades due to its tribal nature...

Posted

Turkey been in NATO for the last decade in name only. Turkey is continued to be wooed by both NATO and Russia for reasons of geography, not for the sake of ideology. Erdrogen ideology is a fantasy of Ottoman Empire 2.0 with the Arab nations licking his feet and Europe kissing his ring and the US and Russia bowing in his court.

Posted (edited)

If you are right, the Erdogan Doctrine is nuts.

You need to follow English language Turkish news more, you will be surprised. Especially on 29th of May.

Edited by Mistral
Posted

Turkey been in NATO for the last decade in name only. Turkey is continued to be wooed by both NATO and Russia for reasons of geography, not for the sake of ideology. Erdrogen ideology is a fantasy of Ottoman Empire 2.0 with the Arab nations licking his feet and Europe kissing his ring and the US and Russia bowing in his court.

As well as other NATO members are as long as there is no real war. Re Erdrogen ideology, I know little about it (despite visiting Turkey many times as tourist) – but if common Western reporting of it is of the same quality as Western reporting on “Putin ideology” than it is most likely far from reality.

Posted

Straight out of MIG-29S Squadron 4, Nowheresville, Russia.

 

I got another problem here. I've got to send someone from this squadron to Libya. I've got to do something here, I still can't believe it...

Well look on the bright side, it beats flying Rubber Dog Shit out of Vladivostok. :)

 

I love Mig29's. I really dont want to see them being bombed, but maybe thats why they are there.

Posted

I admit to being poorly informed about Turkish news. The Erdogan Doctrine may be nuts, but I also think the Gulen under his bed is something other than a harmless cleric.

 

Well look on the bright side, it beats flying Rubber Dog Shit out of Vladivostok. :)

 

lol

 

Even those beaten up MIG-29 examples have an air of menace to them. Turkey may want to consider sending its best if it responds in kind.

Posted

It's still a perfectly good tactical fighter. A bit out of date, but perhaps it's a reasonable matchup to Turkish F16s. If you forget the complete lack of AWACs anyway.

Posted

The Erdogan Doctrine may be nuts, but I also think the Gulen under his bed is something other than a harmless cleric.

 

Gulen is also neo-osmanist, same as Erdogan.

Posted

A very interesting matchup against Turkish F-16s. And going by Russia's track record, sending a few serious Jester-type aces along with the unpainted MIGs and "eastern european" pilots they send to Libya would be just like them. Plus, I have always liked big, twin-engined heavy fighters.

 

Neo-osmanists cloaked in religion for tax exempt status, not so much.

Posted

A very interesting matchup against Turkish F-16s. And going by Russia's track record, sending a few serious Jester-type aces along with the unpainted MIGs and "eastern european" pilots they send to Libya would be just like them. Plus, I have always liked big, twin-engined heavy fighters.

 

Neo-osmanists cloaked in religion for tax exempt status, not so much.

Mig-29 is twin-engine, but hardly big (Su-27 is big)

I do not think there are Russian pilots in this deployment – as there are plenty of others on the market to hire (and pilots from Ukraine, poorest country of Europe, are the most logical choice).

Meanwhile, papers found somewhere in Libya show structure of some unit trained by Russian-speaking advisor (non-Russian speakers believe it is the list of “Russian mercenaries” but it is not - as there is no single non-Arab name in the list)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZWkv2oWoAMkFns?format=jpg&

Columns are, left to right

(probably name in Arabic)

Name in Russian

Position/role in Russian

(Position/role in Arabic?)

Nickname in Russian

(Nickname in Arabic?)

Position column, top to bottom:

3rd Platoon commander

1st section commander

Machine gunner

RPG operator

RPG operator aid

Rifleman

Rifleman

Rifleman

2nd section commander

Machine gunner

RPG operator

RPG operator aid

Rifleman

Rifleman

Rifleman

3nd section commander

Machine gunner

RPG operator

RPG operator aid

Rifleman

Rifleman

Rifleman

Posted

 

I think they person the Russians are playing chicken with is 'Just The Tayyip', not the West. If anyone is going to overtly react to Russian jets being present, it will be the Turks. I would assume drones would be used if the Turks went that way, but F-16's could easily stage out that far with in flight refueling or a light load.

I think you are missing time factor: arranging the deal with sponsors (probably UAE is paying the bills), preparing the planes (i would not be surprised if they are from dozens of Mig-29th abandoned by Ukrainian AF in Crimea as they were unable to fix them - but Russian plants can, especially for this one-way deployment), finding pilots (probably also from Eastern Europe or Ukraine), arranging all details - how long ago it all started? Quite likely the planes were planned to arrive right in time to became victorious LNA new national aviation (as LNA was advancing quite well back then).. Also i can't rule out Turks somehow were aware of it (or even informed of it) making them rush to deploy armor and Syrian rebel forces to Libya, abandoning efforts in Idlib - as result NATO's second strongest army and Russia regional competitor now bogged down in civil war overseas while de-facto loosing positions in convenient conflict next to its border. Desert war in Libya may last decades due to its tribal nature...

 

 

What is the Russian government's stated objectives in Libya?

Posted

 

 

 

 

What is the Russian government's stated objectives in Libya?

 

 

"Russia firmly believes that there is no alternative to a political settlement based on an inclusive intra-Libyan dialogue and strict compliance with the decisions regarding Libya adopted by the international community. In this context, we support the initiative of Aguila Saleh, speaker of the eastern-based Libyan parliament, aimed at stopping the fratricidal conflict and at establishing new common bodies of power. We believe that this initiative could be used as the basis for the UN-led restoration of Libyan consensus." from https://www.mid.ru/en/web/guest/maps/us/-/asset_publisher/unVXBbj4Z6e8/content/id/4143562

 

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Turkey in the Hay day of NATO is not the Turkey of today. Most of NATO would rather it was not there,.

Posted (edited)

Well, that's one thing that "most of" NATO, Russia and China can all agree on then, that Turkey should leave NATO.

Edited by glenn239

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...