JasonJ Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 NATO mission in Iraq that started in 2018 with 500 personnel to increase to 4000 personnel. Quote WASHINGTON – NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced Thursday that the 30-member alliance will expand its security training mission in Iraq in order to prevent the war-torn country from becoming a safe haven for international terrorists. "The size of our mission will increase from 500 personnel to around 4,000 and training activities will now include more Iraqi security institutions and areas beyond Baghdad," Stoltenberg told reporters at the conclusion of a two-day virtual NATO defense ministers meeting. ... https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/02/18/nato-expands-mission-in-iraq-on-the-heels-of-deadly-rocket-attack.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonJ Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 A couple of folllw-up bits on that NATO mission. https://beta.cp24.com/news/2021/2/17/1_5312124.html https://fmn.dk/en/topics/operations/igangvarende-operationer/irak/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty_Zuk Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 This is good news. The US has been going the slow but steady route, turning foes into friends in the ME region, helping them to gain security, rebuild, stabilize, and modernize. But a core issue that threatens such gains is sheer incompetence in the militaries of said countries. Sending trainers and advisers would be relatively easy on the budget of NATO, compared with combat units, and may yield greater results in the long term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo Niehorster Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 In theory, yes. But who will protect these trainers and advisors from the crazies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty_Zuk Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 5 minutes ago, Leo Niehorster said: In theory, yes. But who will protect these trainers and advisors from the crazies? They will go light, but not unequipped at all. Those 2 Iron Dome batteries could come in handy, once they're operational. Other assets exist in the region for quick response should they face more than the occasional rockets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo Niehorster Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 Normal combat troops with heavy equipment and a plentiful air force couldn't do that, why do you think that lightly equipped teachers will? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty_Zuk Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 19 minutes ago, Leo Niehorster said: Normal combat troops with heavy equipment and a plentiful air force couldn't do that, why do you think that lightly equipped teachers will? Can you define the threat that they could not defend themselves from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistral Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 4 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said: Can you define the threat that they could not defend themselves from? Blue on blue from their trainees, IEDs to and from their training areas, rocket/mortar attacks on their well known bases, sniper fire on said bases etc. All of the above happened dozens of times. if several hundred thousand combat troops could not stop that, some trainers will? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty_Zuk Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Mistral said: Blue on blue from their trainees, IEDs to and from their training areas, rocket/mortar attacks on their well known bases, sniper fire on said bases etc. All of the above happened dozens of times. if several hundred thousand combat troops could not stop that, some trainers will? Then they don't need an armored division to guard them. Ride in MRAPs and get a few Dragoons units to escort them. What the hell is this defeatist attitude? I did my service too, you know. I had 2 options: Do it right and benefit from it at least as much as the army benefited from having me, or be just an average joe. And the only way to get the first option is to adopt a very simple mindset: Shit at work and get shit done. Edited February 20, 2021 by Mighty_Zuk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BansheeOne Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 "60 Minutes" segment on the Iranian missile strike against Al Asad Airbase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) There is a good article on this on the drive. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39527/everything-new-we-just-learned-about-the-iranian-missile-attack-on-al-asad-air-base 60 Minutes" has now revealed that the U.S. government also had additional indications well before the missiles began raining down that strikes were coming from monitoring Iranian purchases of commercial satellite imagery of Al Asad. U.S. Marine Corps General Frank McKenzie, head of CENTCOM, said he waited until intelligence told him the Iranians had downloaded their last commercial image of the base for the day before beginning evacuations and the movement of equipment. In doing so, they severely disrupted the effectiveness of the Iranian attack and likely saved many lives and lots of equipment in the process. Edited March 2, 2021 by Stuart Galbraith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 This was interesting too, reminiscent of some planned Nazi facilities. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37440/iran-now-has-automated-missile-launching-magazines-for-its-underground-bases Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Peter Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 13 hours ago, Stuart Galbraith said: said he waited until intelligence told him the Iranians had downloaded their last commercial image of the base for the day before beginning evacuations and the movement of equipment. So what Iran have to do to oust the USA from Iraq is just purchasing commercial sat pictures of the inhabited areas... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty_Zuk Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 21 minutes ago, Adam Peter said: So what Iran have to do to oust the USA from Iraq is just purchasing commercial sat pictures of the inhabited areas... Yes. They did just that and now American forces are no more in Iraq. Definitely not a single soldier, let alone base. The Al Asad airbase, without a doubt, no longer exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Adam Peter said: So what Iran have to do to oust the USA from Iraq is just purchasing commercial sat pictures of the inhabited areas... Yes, possibly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Wow, we were so much closer to a war then was advertised. Seeing the footage and the damage, it seems like an absolute statistical anomaly that no one was killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Nah, Trump wouldn't have retaliated even if someone was ki!led. He was have said they were BLM rockets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 TDS again. I cut your hand any you slap me few times. Who got better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn239 Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Josh said: Wow, we were so much closer to a war then was advertised. Seeing the footage and the damage, it seems like an absolute statistical anomaly that no one was killed. What really stood out is how unprepared the defenders seemed. They had no air defenses against the threat, their bunker network was Titanic levels of inadequate housing to cover existing numbers, they relied on known Hussein era bunkers that a hypersonic missile could easily have shredded, and all the trucks with people in them sitting out in the desert only a short distance from the airbase seemed like something that should not be repeated. Edited March 3, 2021 by glenn239 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Would it have helped you to recognise someone taking the piss, if I put a smiley after it? That said,no, I don't think he would have hit back. It would have meant going back on the ending the endless wars narrative. The narrative that nobody was wounded, when they clearly were, illustrates he was trying to sidestep the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Stuart Galbraith said: Would it have helped you to recognise someone taking the piss, if I put a smiley after it? That said,no, I don't think he would have hit back. It would have meant going back on the ending the endless wars narrative. The narrative that nobody was wounded, when they clearly were, illustrates he was trying to sidestep the issue. I think if there were fatalities, Trump would have had to commit to some retaliatory action. Popular opinion and the legistlature would have demanded it, and I think after some hesitation he would have green lit something (there were established plans ahead of time, all he'd have to do is authorize one). But yes, the level of the Iranian strike really put Trump between Iraq and a hard place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Oh very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BansheeOne Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Not seen "Hot Shots 2“, have you? 😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Galbraith Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 I have, but it was so long ago it was on Betamax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 4 hours ago, glenn239 said: What really stood out is how unprepared the defenders seemed. They had no air defenses against the threat, their bunker network was Titanic levels of inadequate housing to cover existing numbers, they relied on known Hussein era bunkers that a hypersonic missile could easily have shredded, and all the trucks with people in them sitting out in the desert only a short distance from the airbase seemed like something that should not be repeated. Most specifically, why were MIM-104s in the KSA but not in Iraq? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now