Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

^_^ Tomas, you are one of a rare breed... ;)

Edited by shep854
Posted

Should have called it the "Kickback".

Posted

 

Should have called it the "Kickback".

N.I.H US might have been more accurate. :P

 

 

Pronounced as "Nigh Yus" :lol:

Posted

 

A cross eyed Pegasus? How does it not fly into a tree?

Actually, she does.
Thats a start but it needs to be wearing some reflective belts to really represent the the USAF.
Posted (edited)

 

 

A cross eyed Pegasus? How does it not fly into a tree?

Actually, she does.
Thats a start but it needs to be wearing some reflective belts to really represent the the USAF.

 

 

There's got to be some kind of political satire about waste in the F-35 program in this

full.gif

Edited by Max H
Posted

 

 

A cross eyed Pegasus? How does it not fly into a tree?

Actually, she does.
Thats a start but it needs to be wearing some reflective belts to really represent the the USAF.

Were I a pilot on one of these I would so totally paint that

mlp pegasus as nose art. with reflective belt. :lol:

Posted

Were I a pilot on one of these I would so totally paint that

mlp pegasus as nose art. with reflective belt. :lol:

My view on those evil ponies aside, that would be great.

 

Unusual name for a tanker really. I was expecting Stratotanker II or something.

Posted

I am not that fond of MLP myself. Mostly because it got out of hand in recent years.

 

 

Yeah, naming a tanker. Well I like KC-10 Extender. perfectly describes the purpose. Hmm.

 

Globalizer?

Grand Mileage?

Gas Station?

Fueller?

pump nozzle?

Gas Guzzler?

Posted

I am not that fond of MLP myself. Mostly because it got out of hand in recent years.

 

 

Yeah, naming a tanker. Well I like KC-10 Extender. perfectly describes the purpose. Hmm.

 

Globalizer?

Grand Mileage?

Gas Station?

Fueller?

pump nozzle?

Gas Guzzler?

 

I like the sound of globalizer

Posted

They are not jumping from sub-sonic to twice supersonic at Mach 2 without properly adjusting training and thinking that the experienced pilots need only a short go around and are flight ready. The Bundeswehr totally underestimated the problems associated with Mach 2 flight.

 

 

Really, a 767 is not that different from a 707 or KC-10 in speed and other characteristics. And I do not think they will go cheap on the training.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...