JWB Posted February 5 Posted February 5 7 minutes ago, Roman Alymov said: First, let me remind you convicted felon is now in White House What happens now that Trump has been convicted in his hush money criminal case | CNN Politics Second, i do not remember Western cheer team refraining from use of convicted criminals statements (for example. of Khodarkovsky and Navalny) when posting another "Russia bad" stories. What does any of that have to do with fake videos created by a fraudster? Is whataboutism the only thing you have to debate with?
JWB Posted February 5 Posted February 5 (edited) The Russian defense ministry gave one of the Russian units a donkey instead of a normal vehicle to bring ammunition to the frontline, according to a video that appeared on Russian Telegram channels. https://x.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1887043943453331731 Edited February 5 by JWB
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 (edited) 1 hour ago, JWB said: The Russian defense ministry gave one of the Russian units a donkey instead of a normal vehicle to bring ammunition to the frontline, according to a video that appeared on Russian Telegram channels. https://x.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1887043943453331731 What is "normal vehicle to bring ammunition to the frontline"? Taking into account most of frontline (for both sides) is currently supplied by people carrying ammo, water, food, fuel for heaters and generators etc. on foot accross drone-controlled "dead zone", donkey is majot improvement (donkey and guide could carry twice the load man could, and man could carry much better (=heavy) body armor if not carrying cargo on his back, so higher survival rate. P.S. FiberFPV vs. "normal vehicle" ( BvS-10 Viking ) stuck and abandoned in Russian mud off Pokrovsk https://t.me/milinfolive/141270 P.P.S Donkeys in RusArmy frontline service https://t.me/milinfolive/141363 Edited February 5 by Roman Alymov
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 28 minutes ago, JWB said: What does any of that have to do with fake videos created by a fraudster? Is whataboutism the only thing you have to debate with? I'm sorry but what is fake in this video? The fact you do not like opinion expressed is not making the video fake, while person expressing it being convicted in his past is bringing him in good company of current US Presudent. Any more objections?
JWB Posted February 5 Posted February 5 14 minutes ago, Roman Alymov said: I'm sorry but what is fake in this video? At the 1:38 mark he claims US government is plans to shut down project Ukraine. That is impossible because project Ukraine is a private charity. I watched for a few more minutes that I will never get back and had to stop because of other bits of non sense having to do with US desire to see Zelenskyy replaced.
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Just now, JWB said: At the 1:38 mark he claims US government is plans to shut down project Ukraine. That is impossible because project Ukraine is a private charity. I watched for a few more minutes that I will never get back and had to stop because of other bits of non sense having to do with US desire to see Zelenskyy replaced. It is your objections (you are free to have them) but it is not making the video fake as you claimed. By the way remind me please, what private charity have donated USD 170 bln into this project. please?
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 FiberFPVs compilation, Kursk region https://t.me/boris_rozhin/153681
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Another safari in Russia ended badly Brit, 18, killed by Russian drone minutes into first mission on Ukraine frontline as pal says 'he didn't stand a chance' | The Sun
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Video from the first days of "big war": UkrArmy soldiers in the truck from towed artillery column are watching and filming RusArmy column passing by, nobody is killing them as pro-Russians were under strict order to minimise enemy casualties https://t.me/milinfolive/141307
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Drone-directed Iskander-M strike on pro-Ukr vehicles in cover, Sumy region https://t.me/anna_news/75940
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Helmet cam view of pro-Rus infantry movements somewhere near Pokrovsk https://t.me/anna_news/75974
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 (edited) Fiber FPVs vs. UAT Gyurza MRAP and M2A2 Bradley ODS-SA IFV. Pokrovsk https://t.me/milinfolive/141374 Location https://t.me/creamy_caprice/8299 Edited February 5 by Roman Alymov
Roman Alymov Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Wreck of French VAB, Krasnogorovka https://t.me/boris_rozhin/153697
TrustMe Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Extremely interesting view of the Russian Aerospace Force actions in Ukraine ... https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/January-February-2025/Meeting-Expectations/
glenn239 Posted February 6 Posted February 6 (edited) 2 hours ago, TrustMe said: Extremely interesting view of the Russian Aerospace Force actions in Ukraine ... Russia is not trying to build an American-style air force. NATO should not expect an aggressive RADF with a well-integrated attack capable of asserting aerial superiority over a given territory. NATO should expect more standoff weapons, such as the loitering munitions and glide bombs, to be employed in future conflicts. These assets will augment Russia’s doctrine by increasing the RADF’s ability to overwhelm enemy air defenses. The Russians will employ barrages of relatively accurate standoff munitions at static targets. Rather than inspiring reform, the high losses of crewed assets and assessed success of standoff weapons entrenches the RADF in its assumptions. Nothing to see in Ukraine boys, move along! The lethality of Ukrainian air defenses against conventional non-stealthy Russian aircraft is obviously the primary impetus of Russian tactics. The few times that larger Russian formations have found themselves in the crosshairs of systems capable of simultaneous engagements like the Patriot, they've paid a brutal price. For the article to suppose from this that future Russian tactics with the next generation of stealthy platforms, (S-70, etc) will be similar, this seems premature. A more grounded assumption might be that the Russian military industrial base cannot support a USAF sized air force and will be forced by matters of economy to rely on increasingly sophisticated drone and missile forces to negate Western airpower, while evolving their airpower in a Western offensive direction as more appropriate platforms to such missions come into operation. Also not sure that the language of Russian "barrage" tactics against "fixed" targets is being fully accountable to the facts as we are seeing them. Edited February 6 by glenn239
Roman Alymov Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Today early in the morning pro-Ukrainians (or NATO?) launched another offencive out of Sudja in SE direction, reportedly by two columns - one directly through Cherkasskaya Konopel'ka village, anither one over fields, ib general direction of Ulanok village. As usual in such cases, events are covered with fog of war, pro-Rus TG is full of drone videos of enemy armor attacked by drones.Seems like wide mix of armot is taking part M1126 Stryker https://t.me/milinfolive/141426 T-64B https://t.me/milinfolive/141420 The same T64B, Wisent 1 MC, Cougar H https://t.me/milinfolive/141411 Bergepanzer 2 and M113 IFV https://t.me/milinfolive/141403 MRAP of unidentified type and IMR-2 https://t.me/milinfolive/141419 More drone videos compilation https://t.me/NeoficialniyBeZsonoV/43509 https://t.me/warriorofnorth/5986 Note Western tanks are not taking part, so quite likely it is distraction attempt.
Roman Alymov Posted February 6 Posted February 6 (edited) Reportedly the first case of German PzH2000 SPG destroyed by fiberFPV drone (not Lancet of guided shell), Donetsk region https://t.me/infomil_live/14755 Not clear why this SPG was positioned just 8 km from contact line.... Edited February 6 by Roman Alymov
Roman Alymov Posted February 6 Posted February 6 "00:00 The 1st wave of the enemy's roll towards Ulanok, February 6, 2025, time 10.08, the beginning of the APU attack 02:24 The 2nd wave of the attack, the same direction, time 10.40. 03:54 - enemy vehicles begins to burn 04:25 The 3rd wave of the roll, the same direction, going the same way to Ulanok, time 11.59 05:15 The 4th wave rolled in, it's hard to call it a wave, it was the enemy's SOF group jumping on 2 Stryker armored personnel carriers, the group split up. The 1st group went deep into the Cherkassky Konopelky, the 2nd group began to try to dig in there. Footage of an dismounts landing under the fire of the Russian Army and attempts by the Ukrainian Armed Forces to push armored vehicles to the rear using other vehicles are visible." https://t.me/c/1688853451/285068
bojan Posted February 6 Posted February 6 1 hour ago, Roman Alymov said: ...Not clear why this SPG was positioned just 8 km from contact line.... In order to be able to fire deep into Russian territory.
Roman Alymov Posted February 7 Posted February 7 8 hours ago, bojan said: In order to be able to fire deep into Russian territory. This explanation is correct but too simplistic, as position of this SPG (dugout with cover) is too good to be constructed from scratch in "dead zone". More likely, this SPG was operating from this places for some time with relative impunity, but 1) Contact line movement and 2) Rapid pgogress of fiberFPV drones that are not only totally imune to EW, but are also providing much better "picture" for operator, made this position unsafe - but crew of this SPG (or their command) failed to understand that in time/ FiberFPV vs. rare Uragan MLRS launcher, Sumy region https://t.me/infomil_live/14764 FiberFPV vs. BM-21 Grad MLRS https://t.me/infomil_live/14766 Pro-Ukr video - soldier filming his SUV (with EW devices) destroyed by fiberFPV https://t.me/milinfolive/141454
Roman Alymov Posted February 7 Posted February 7 Geran' drone with lights somewhere over Kiev https://t.me/infomil_live/14765 Not clear why lights are installed - may be, to attract small arms fire....
seahawk Posted February 7 Posted February 7 10 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Reportedly the first case of German PzH2000 SPG destroyed by fiberFPV drone (not Lancet of guided shell), Donetsk region https://t.me/infomil_live/14755 Not clear why this SPG was positioned just 8 km from contact line.... A beautiful kill. Nice skill by the operators of the drones.
Roman Alymov Posted February 7 Posted February 7 Wreck of CV9040C IFV, Kursk region https://t.me/milinfolive/141472
alejandro_ Posted February 7 Posted February 7 On 2/5/2025 at 6:15 PM, Roman Alymov said: Video from the first days of "big war": UkrArmy soldiers in the truck from towed artillery column are watching and filming RusArmy column passing by, nobody is killing them as pro-Russians were under strict order to minimise enemy casualties https://t.me/milinfolive/141307 There also accusations of Ukrainian officers in that region ordering men to stand down, with the government investigating/having investigated what happened. Viktor Nazrov, former chief of staff and aide of general Zaluzhnyi in the early days of the war, was asked about this in an interview, but he claims it was due to inferiority in numbers. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/articles/cde9rw8rzjgo?fbclid=IwY2xjawIMFyNleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHSqh-xTLPd80EukngnseJXJXpLCt2ToScn5TwnKh5di4lhFLnhlNW3NkCQ_aem_v2fON8cGPBmW2DzbzIZEng The interview is worth reading by the way.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now