Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Roman Alymov

    16007

  • Stuart Galbraith

    11311

  • glenn239

    5021

  • Josh

    3789

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
51 minutes ago, Yama said:

It goes way beyond WW1, famously Bismarck said that eradication of Poles was necessity for Germans to survive.

Interesting. Did not recall that, but considering Bismarck politics and policies, it makes sense.

So, the known Poland's struggle to survive between two empires becomes even more commendable.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Stuart Galbraith said:

I dont need to remind you that Ukraine was independent at this point, and therefore absolutely none of the Soviets business, anymore than was Georgia or the Baltic states, let alone a need for 'halting the invasion', since it was no part of your country that was being invaded.

No, I probably DO need to remind you of it.

Actually, it was not as by summer of 1919 the remains of so called UNR (UPR) were occupied by Polish forces (and before that, UNR forces were crushed not by Red Army, But by White Army (namely Denikin forces)

"After the defeat of the Central Powers in World War I, the Hetmanate regime lost its external allies and its position became precarious. On November 13, 1918, former members of the Central Rada, headed by Vladimir Vinnichenko, formed the Directory of the Ukrainian People's Republic, the most influential figure of which would later become Simon Petliura. The directory began an armed struggle with the Hetman. Already on December 14, the Directory's troops occupied Kiev, the Hetmanate regime fell, and the UPR was restored. Since February 1919, after Vinnichenko's resignation from the post of chairman of the Directory, Petlyura became the de facto head of the UPR.

The leadership of the UPR established close relations with another Ukrainian state entity — the West Ukrainian People's Republic, proclaimed on the lands of the former Austro-Hungarian Galicia inhabited by Ukrainians and under pressure from Poland. On December 1, 1918, the delegates of the Directory and the ZUNR signed in the city of Fastov a preliminary agreement on the unification of both Ukrainian republics into one state, and on January 22, 1919, the solemn proclamation of the Act on the Unification of the UNR and the ZUNR on a federal basis (the Act of Zluka) took place in Kiev.

On November 17, 1918, the Provisional Workers' and Peasants' Government of Ukraine was established in Moscow, headed by G. Pyatakov, whose armed formations launched an offensive against Ukraine in December. On January 16, 1919, the Directory declared war on Soviet Russia, in which it was defeated — already in February, the Red Army took Kiev. The Ukrainian SSR was declared restored. By March, of the major cities of Ukraine, only Zhytomyr and Vinnytsia were under the control of the UPR.

In the summer of 1919, taking advantage of the beginning of the offensive of Denikin's troops into Ukraine, the troops of the Directory together with the military formations of the ZUNR — the so—called Galician Army - launched a counteroffensive and on August 30 (simultaneously with the Whites) occupied Kiev, but the next day they were expelled from there by the White Guards. The command of the Armed Forces of South of Russia refused to negotiate with Petliura, and by October 1919 the Petliurists had been defeated. In early November, the command of the Galician Army signed an agreement with the command of the Volunteer Army. At the end of 1919, the head of the ZUNR, Yevgeny Petrushevich, denounced the Act of Unification.

Petlyura fled to Warsaw, where, on behalf of the Directory, on April 21, 1920, he concluded an agreement with the Polish government on a joint war against Soviet Russia on the terms of recognizing the transfer of Western Ukrainian lands to Poland beyond the former Russian-Austrian border. After the end of the Polish-Soviet war and the signing of the peace treaty, the UPR finally ceased to exist as a real state entity."

   By the way brother of my Grandgrandfather was Denikin's officer - unfortunatelly, we do not have any memoirs from him.

   

Posted
45 minutes ago, sunday said:

Interesting. Did not recall that, but considering Bismarck politics and policies, it makes sense.

So, the known Poland's struggle to survive between two empires becomes even more commendable.

Haut doch die Polen, daß sie am Leben verzagen; ich habe alles Mitgefühl für ihre Lage, aber wir können, wenn wir bestehn wollen, nichts andres tun, als sie ausrotten; der Wolf kann auch nicht dafür, daß er von Gott geschaffen ist, wie er ist, und man schießt ihn doch dafür totd, wenn man kann.

Hit the Poles so hard that they despair of their life; I have full sympathy with their condition, but if we want to survive, we can only exterminate them; the wolf, too, cannot help having been created by God as he is, but people shoot him for it if they can.

Posted
2 hours ago, Yama said:

It goes way beyond WW1, famously Bismarck said that eradication of Poles was necessity for Germans to survive.

This is a quote out of context. The quote has to be understood as meaning that Poles (catholic) would never become citizens of the German Reich (protestant). Therefore they were considered foes of the empire (Reichsfeinde).  But they were not alone, Bismarck considered political Catholicism, the Danish minority,  the French minority, the labour movement and others as foes of the empire.

Posted
On 3/22/2018 at 7:39 PM, Roman Alymov said:

Now it is official: Nadejda Savchenko, Hero of Ukraine and personal protégé of US President (and many other Western politicians and Russian liberals) arrested today in Ukrainian Parliament by SBU on accusations of planning destroying Parliament building by two hand granades she was planning to throw personally + mortar fire from ship on Dniper river+MG fire on survivors. Also accused of planning to shoot Ukr President car with DNR-produced 12.7mm rifle. President Poroshenko have congratulated SBU with uncovering Russian plot.

https://112.international/ukraine-top-news/poroshenko-commented-lifting-of-immunity-detention-of-savchenko-26861.html

Poroshenko commented lifting of immunity, detention of Savchenko

 

High time for Putin to send couple of armor divisions to #FreeSavchenko, as he was asked by Western partners so many times.

Do you still remember Nadejda Savchenko, the entire FreeWorld was demanding to be released from Russian captivity? Fresh news about her from Mariana Bezuglaya, former deputy head of Ukr Parliament Defence commetee and acting MP:

"The network reported that Nadezhda Savchenko is fighting as a company commander in one of the Territorial Defence brigades. However, no one wrote that, as I learned, it was her unauthorized and unexpected order to retreat the unit that caused the "domino effect" of the breakthrough in Ocheretino, which launched cascading processes of forming the Russian offensive on Pokrovsk. 

Pay attention to the radiostation (on the photo on Savcjenko in original TG message - RA) that Savchenko uses-this is exactly the type that is easily listened to by Russians. 

I ask the Security Service of Ukraine to pay attention and study in detail Savchenko's activities in the Armed Forces of Ukraine." https://t.me/marybezuhla/2317

    Note back in 2014 she have led her unit into pro-Rus ambush. Now she have collapsed important part of frontline....

Posted
55 minutes ago, seahawk said:

This is a quote out of context. The quote has to be understood as meaning that Poles (catholic) would never become citizens of the German Reich (protestant). Therefore they were considered foes of the empire (Reichsfeinde).  But they were not alone, Bismarck considered political Catholicism, the Danish minority,  the French minority, the labour movement and others as foes of the empire.

...great?

Seems to me if you don't want some people as citizens of your empire, maybe not annex their lands then? Or am I nuts?

Posted
14 hours ago, Yama said:

Maybe that was not the brightest spot in history of Poland, but really it would be absurd to argue it would have mattered to Nazis at all had Poland stayed out of it. Hitler (and not just him, but many Germans) saw Polish state an anathema which should not be allowed to exist.

Stuart is constantly going on about Chamberlain's role at Munich in 1938.  But what if Poland in 1938 had accepted the Soviet proposal of an alliance to the purpose of supporting the Czechs against the Germans?  

Posted

Considering that the elections of 1881 the foes of the empire gained about 2/3 of the seats in parliament, I would not make more of Bismarck`s opinion than it was - the opinion of an old Prussian leader.

Posted
8 hours ago, Roman Alymov said:

   I think it is not correct to say that "in 1938 Poland sided with Hitler". I would rather put it another way: in this years, Germany led by "collective Hitler" and Poland led by "collective  Piłsudski"*  were practicing simmilar political lines and this lines were not so different from best practicies by other imperialist powers. 

Had Poland sided with Prague, then Poland would have mobilized its army at Germany in unison with the Czechs and approved a Soviet expeditionary force of some ratio to Polish troops - say 1:3 or something like that.  Poland would have pressed in Paris and London for similar measures.  Did Warsaw do that?  No, they went after the Slovaks.  They sided with Hitler.

Posted
1 minute ago, glenn239 said:

Had Poland sided with Prague, then Poland would have mobilized its army at Germany in unison with the Czechs and approved a Soviet expeditionary force of some ratio to Polish troops - say 1:3 or something like that.  Poland would have pressed in Paris and London for similar measures.  Did Warsaw do that?  No, they went after the Slovaks.  They sided with Hitler.

In 1938 Stalin atrocities were known. Hitler's less so.

Posted
2 minutes ago, glenn239 said:

Stuart is constantly going on about Chamberlain's role at Munich in 1938.  But what if Poland in 1938 had accepted the Soviet proposal of an alliance to the purpose of supporting the Czechs against the Germans?  

   It was obviously impossible for Pilsudsky's Poland to accept any alliance with USSR, that was both their old enemy Russia and new enemy Communists. What happened in 1939 was actually rooted back in 1919 if not earlier - may be as far away as XVII when Poland became the only place where nobiles have prevailed over central power.....

Posted
4 minutes ago, glenn239 said:

Had Poland sided with Prague, then Poland would have mobilized its army at Germany in unison with the Czechs and approved a Soviet expeditionary force of some ratio to Polish troops - say 1:3 or something like that.  Poland would have pressed in Paris and London for similar measures.  Did Warsaw do that?  No, they went after the Slovaks.  They sided with Hitler.

Again, Poland have started acting this way long before Hitler became any political figure (see the story of how Vilnus became Vilno). And nobody paid attention. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Yama said:

...great?

Seems to me if you don't want some people as citizens of your empire, maybe not annex their lands then? Or am I nuts?

Dunno.  Ask the Israelis.

Posted
7 minutes ago, sunday said:

In 1938 Stalin atrocities were known. Hitler's less so.

The question stands.  Had the Poles accepted the Soviet proposal for an expeditionary force and mobilized in unison with the Czechs at Germany, what happens?

Posted
1 minute ago, glenn239 said:

The question stands.  Had the Poles accepted the Soviet proposal for an expeditionary force and mobilized in unison with the Czechs at Germany, what happens?

A 'spontaneous' communist revolution starts in Poland. Possibly the revolutionary 'government' issues a petition to become a Soviet republic.

Posted
3 hours ago, sunday said:

Interesting. Did not recall that, but considering Bismarck politics and policies, it makes sense.

So, the known Poland's struggle to survive between two empires becomes even more commendable.

Reichsfende: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichsfeinde it took a more sinister meaning with the Nazis. Bismarck pretty much wanted a WASP Germany.

Posted
32 minutes ago, glenn239 said:

Had Poland sided with Prague, then Poland would have mobilized its army at Germany in unison with the Czechs and approved a Soviet expeditionary force of some ratio to Polish troops - say 1:3 or something like that.  Poland would have pressed in Paris and London for similar measures.  Did Warsaw do that?  No, they went after the Slovaks.  They sided with Hitler.

Did Czechoslovakia 'side with the Soviet Union' by taking the same area from Poland in 1920?

Posted
6 minutes ago, urbanoid said:

A 'spontaneous' communist revolution starts in Poland. Possibly the revolutionary 'government' issues a petition to become a Soviet republic.

No need for USSR for this, socialist/communist elements have remained in Poland by the end of 1930th (not surprising since  their heavy presence in RusEmpire time  -and Poland was not exactly worker's paradise)

From Коммунистическая партия Польши — Википедия

The Communist Party of Poland, KPP (gender. Komunistyczna Partia Polski, KPP) was a revolutionary communist party that operated in Poland in 1918-1938, until 1925 it was called the Communist Workers' Party of Poland, KPP (gender. Komunistyczna Partia Robotnicza Polski, KPRP).

History
Foundation
The KRPP was founded on December 16, 1918 as a result of the unification of the Social Democracy of the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania (SDKPiL) and the Polish Socialist Party - Levica (PPP—Levica). In March 1919, the representative of the KRPP, Joseph Unschlicht, participated in the founding congress of the Communist International, and in July the party officially joined the Comintern. In 1919, the KRPP participated in the parliamentary elections, winning 2 seats in the Sejm.

In 1919-1920, fragments of large Jewish organizations joined the party: the Polish Bund, Poalei Zion and Vereinigte ("Unification"), as well as the Belarusian Socialist Party and the Ukrainian Social Democratic Workers' Party. In 1920, the left wing of the Polish Socialist Party (PPP) joined the KRPP. Representatives of other leftist and socialist organizations in Poland constantly joined the party[1].

For supporting the RSFSR in the Soviet-Polish War of 1919-1921, the KPP was banned and operated illegally. The Communist Party opposed Poland's occupation of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus[2]. After the start of the Red Army's counteroffensive on June 30, 1920, the Provisional Revolutionary Committee of Poland (Polrevkom) was formed in Bialystok from members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the Polish Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP(b). It consists of: Julian Marhlevsky (Chairman), Felix Dzerzhinsky, Edward Prukhnyak, Joseph Unschlicht, Felix Kohn, Bernard Sachs, Stanislav Bobinsky, Tadeusz Rydwansky. The body functioned in the territories that were under the control of the Red Army, and carried out the nationalization of industry, confiscation of large land property and other measures on them[2].

The democratic period
In the relatively democratic period of 1921-1926, the party continued to operate illegally. By 1923, it had 5,000 members in its ranks[3]. The party had influence among trade unions and, under the name of the Union of Urban and Rural Proletariat (Związek Proletariatu Miast i Wsi), participated in the 1922 elections, as a result of which it received the support of 130,000 voters and 2 deputy seats in the Sejm.

The Second Congress of the Communist Party, held in Moscow in September—October 1923, revised the attitude towards peasant, land and national issues. There is a revision of positions related to the theoretical legacy of Rosa Luxemburg, which seriously determined the political line of the party. This legacy was characterized by three main points: the rejection of Lenin's slogan of "national self-determination"; the rejection of Lenin's tactical slogan "land to the peasants"; the rejection of the dictatorship of the proletariat as a means of terror. First of all, the issue of national self-determination was important for the Polish Communist Party. Even after the signing of the Riga Peace Treaty of 1921, it did not agree to recognize the independent Polish Republic and its borders, approved according to this treaty[1].

In 1923, the Communist Party of Western Belarus and the Communist Party of Western Ukraine joined the KRPP as autonomous organizations. At the congress, Adolf Varsky, Henryk Valetsky and Vera Kostsheva were elected to the Politburo of the Central Committee of the KRPP.

Within the party, there were different opinions not only about Trotsky's opposition, but also about Brandler's opposition within the Communist Party of Germany. In December 1923, the Politburo of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation sent a letter to the Central Committee of the CPSU(b) in defense of Trotsky. The letter, in particular, stated:

"... for our party, for the entire International, for the entire world revolutionary proletariat, the name of Comrade Trotsky is inextricably linked with the victorious October Revolution, with the Red Army, with communism and the world revolution"[1].

At the beginning of 1925, the third congress of the KPP was held in Minsk under the slogan of "Bolshevization of the party". A supporter of Stalin, Julian Lensky (Leshchinsky), began to advance to the first place in the party. At the congress, the party was renamed the Communist Party of Poland.

"Rehabilitation"
In May 1926, in a situation of economic crisis and rising unemployment, Jozef Pilsudski carried out a coup d'etat. The leadership of the Communist Party, led by Varsky, supported the coup, considering it a path to a "revolutionary democratic dictatorship"[4]. In Warsaw, members of the party participated in street clashes with supporters of the Vincent Vitos government, which they considered fascist. On May 13, together with the Polish Socialist Party, they organized a general strike. However, the Comintern soon recognized the actions of the leadership of the Polish Communist Party as erroneous.

The discussion of the "May mistake" and the coup of 1926 itself took place at the fourth congress of the KPP, which was held in May —August 1927 in Moscow. There was a split into a majority ("right") and a minority ("left"). Lensky's supporters (the "left faction") claimed that the coup was fascist, while the "right" — Varsky, Kostsheva and others — considered it the beginning of a military dictatorship with tendencies towards fascism. The struggle between the two factions lasted until the end of the 1920s.

In the 1920s and 1930s, the KPP agitated workers and peasants to fight against the "rehabilitation regime", organized numerous strikes and military actions (general strikes of the Lodz textile workers in 1928, 1933, 1936 and other years)[5]. Despite pressure and repression, the Communist Party managed to maintain its representation in the Sejm until the 1935 elections[6].

In the 1930s, the KPP had about 20,000 members. Many Communists were imprisoned: 3,775 people were arrested in 1930, 3,507 in 1931, and 6,982 in 1932. At the initiative of the Communist Party, a wide network of legal left-wing newspapers (over 300 titles) was created in Poland. The central organ of the party was the illegal newspaper Czerwony Sztandar ("Red Banner") and the magazine Nowy Przegląd ("New Review")[5]

The Spanish Civil War
The members of the party took part in the Spanish Civil War. The Polish Communists fought as part of the Dombrowski inter-brigade.

The Comintern Line
The end of the 1920s - the beginning of the 1930s is marked by the so—called "third period" of the Comintern[7]. In the context of this tactic, the fifth congress of the Polish Communist Party was held in 1930, at which the PPP was characterized as a fascist party and the imminent onset of the revolution was announced. However, by the mid-1930s, the tactics had changed. In 1935-1937, according to the decisions of the Seventh Congress of the Comintern, the KPP advocated the unification of the actions of communists, socialists and other forces in the common struggle against fascism[5].

The factional struggle in the party began to fade in 1928-1933. The leaders of the "right" were ousted from leadership positions. In 1929, Julian Lensky became the general secretary of the Communist Party. By the end of the 1930s, the repressions were already affecting Lensky and his supporters. In the Soviet Union, leading figures of the KPP were shot: Adolf Varsky, Joseph Unschlicht, Edward Pruchnyak, Vera Kostsheva, Henryk Valetsky, Julian Lensky and many other Polish communists, such as the writer Bruno Jasensky. Together with the CHECKPOINT, its components were defeated: the Communist Party of Western Ukraine and the Communist Party of Western Belarus.

On August 16, 1938, the Executive Committee of the Comintern declared the Polish Communist Party "saboteur" and voted for its dissolution[8]. After the dissolution, Polish Communists continued to operate in trade unions and other public organizations. In January 1942, former members of the KPP led by Marcel Novotko, Pavel Finder, Malgorzata Fornalska, Boleslav Moloec and others initiated the creation of the Polish Workers' Party. In 1956, the CPSU, the Communist Party of Italy, the Communist Party of Bulgaria, the Communist Party of Finland and the Polish United Workers' Party in a joint statement recognized the dissolution of the KPP in 1938 as unjustified[5].

 

Posted
1 minute ago, urbanoid said:

Did Czechoslovakia 'side with the Soviet Union' by taking the same area from Poland in 1920?

No, as Soviet Union was only founded in 1922, two years later :) In 1920, there was still Civil War in Russia....

Posted
1 minute ago, Roman Alymov said:

No need for USSR for this, socialist/communist elements have remained in Poland by the end of 1930th (not surprising since  their heavy presence in RusEmpire time  -and Poland was not exactly worker's paradise)

From Коммунистическая партия Польши — Википедия

The Communist Party of Poland, KPP (gender. Komunistyczna Partia Polski, KPP) was a revolutionary communist party that operated in Poland in 1918-1938, until 1925 it was called the Communist Workers' Party of Poland, KPP (gender. Komunistyczna Partia Robotnicza Polski, KPRP).

History
Foundation
The KRPP was founded on December 16, 1918 as a result of the unification of the Social Democracy of the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania (SDKPiL) and the Polish Socialist Party - Levica (PPP—Levica). In March 1919, the representative of the KRPP, Joseph Unschlicht, participated in the founding congress of the Communist International, and in July the party officially joined the Comintern. In 1919, the KRPP participated in the parliamentary elections, winning 2 seats in the Sejm.

In 1919-1920, fragments of large Jewish organizations joined the party: the Polish Bund, Poalei Zion and Vereinigte ("Unification"), as well as the Belarusian Socialist Party and the Ukrainian Social Democratic Workers' Party. In 1920, the left wing of the Polish Socialist Party (PPP) joined the KRPP. Representatives of other leftist and socialist organizations in Poland constantly joined the party[1].

For supporting the RSFSR in the Soviet-Polish War of 1919-1921, the KPP was banned and operated illegally. The Communist Party opposed Poland's occupation of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus[2]. After the start of the Red Army's counteroffensive on June 30, 1920, the Provisional Revolutionary Committee of Poland (Polrevkom) was formed in Bialystok from members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the Polish Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP(b). It consists of: Julian Marhlevsky (Chairman), Felix Dzerzhinsky, Edward Prukhnyak, Joseph Unschlicht, Felix Kohn, Bernard Sachs, Stanislav Bobinsky, Tadeusz Rydwansky. The body functioned in the territories that were under the control of the Red Army, and carried out the nationalization of industry, confiscation of large land property and other measures on them[2].

The democratic period
In the relatively democratic period of 1921-1926, the party continued to operate illegally. By 1923, it had 5,000 members in its ranks[3]. The party had influence among trade unions and, under the name of the Union of Urban and Rural Proletariat (Związek Proletariatu Miast i Wsi), participated in the 1922 elections, as a result of which it received the support of 130,000 voters and 2 deputy seats in the Sejm.

The Second Congress of the Communist Party, held in Moscow in September—October 1923, revised the attitude towards peasant, land and national issues. There is a revision of positions related to the theoretical legacy of Rosa Luxemburg, which seriously determined the political line of the party. This legacy was characterized by three main points: the rejection of Lenin's slogan of "national self-determination"; the rejection of Lenin's tactical slogan "land to the peasants"; the rejection of the dictatorship of the proletariat as a means of terror. First of all, the issue of national self-determination was important for the Polish Communist Party. Even after the signing of the Riga Peace Treaty of 1921, it did not agree to recognize the independent Polish Republic and its borders, approved according to this treaty[1].

In 1923, the Communist Party of Western Belarus and the Communist Party of Western Ukraine joined the KRPP as autonomous organizations. At the congress, Adolf Varsky, Henryk Valetsky and Vera Kostsheva were elected to the Politburo of the Central Committee of the KRPP.

Within the party, there were different opinions not only about Trotsky's opposition, but also about Brandler's opposition within the Communist Party of Germany. In December 1923, the Politburo of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation sent a letter to the Central Committee of the CPSU(b) in defense of Trotsky. The letter, in particular, stated:

"... for our party, for the entire International, for the entire world revolutionary proletariat, the name of Comrade Trotsky is inextricably linked with the victorious October Revolution, with the Red Army, with communism and the world revolution"[1].

At the beginning of 1925, the third congress of the KPP was held in Minsk under the slogan of "Bolshevization of the party". A supporter of Stalin, Julian Lensky (Leshchinsky), began to advance to the first place in the party. At the congress, the party was renamed the Communist Party of Poland.

"Rehabilitation"
In May 1926, in a situation of economic crisis and rising unemployment, Jozef Pilsudski carried out a coup d'etat. The leadership of the Communist Party, led by Varsky, supported the coup, considering it a path to a "revolutionary democratic dictatorship"[4]. In Warsaw, members of the party participated in street clashes with supporters of the Vincent Vitos government, which they considered fascist. On May 13, together with the Polish Socialist Party, they organized a general strike. However, the Comintern soon recognized the actions of the leadership of the Polish Communist Party as erroneous.

The discussion of the "May mistake" and the coup of 1926 itself took place at the fourth congress of the KPP, which was held in May —August 1927 in Moscow. There was a split into a majority ("right") and a minority ("left"). Lensky's supporters (the "left faction") claimed that the coup was fascist, while the "right" — Varsky, Kostsheva and others — considered it the beginning of a military dictatorship with tendencies towards fascism. The struggle between the two factions lasted until the end of the 1920s.

In the 1920s and 1930s, the KPP agitated workers and peasants to fight against the "rehabilitation regime", organized numerous strikes and military actions (general strikes of the Lodz textile workers in 1928, 1933, 1936 and other years)[5]. Despite pressure and repression, the Communist Party managed to maintain its representation in the Sejm until the 1935 elections[6].

In the 1930s, the KPP had about 20,000 members. Many Communists were imprisoned: 3,775 people were arrested in 1930, 3,507 in 1931, and 6,982 in 1932. At the initiative of the Communist Party, a wide network of legal left-wing newspapers (over 300 titles) was created in Poland. The central organ of the party was the illegal newspaper Czerwony Sztandar ("Red Banner") and the magazine Nowy Przegląd ("New Review")[5]

The Spanish Civil War
The members of the party took part in the Spanish Civil War. The Polish Communists fought as part of the Dombrowski inter-brigade.

The Comintern Line
The end of the 1920s - the beginning of the 1930s is marked by the so—called "third period" of the Comintern[7]. In the context of this tactic, the fifth congress of the Polish Communist Party was held in 1930, at which the PPP was characterized as a fascist party and the imminent onset of the revolution was announced. However, by the mid-1930s, the tactics had changed. In 1935-1937, according to the decisions of the Seventh Congress of the Comintern, the KPP advocated the unification of the actions of communists, socialists and other forces in the common struggle against fascism[5].

The factional struggle in the party began to fade in 1928-1933. The leaders of the "right" were ousted from leadership positions. In 1929, Julian Lensky became the general secretary of the Communist Party. By the end of the 1930s, the repressions were already affecting Lensky and his supporters. In the Soviet Union, leading figures of the KPP were shot: Adolf Varsky, Joseph Unschlicht, Edward Pruchnyak, Vera Kostsheva, Henryk Valetsky, Julian Lensky and many other Polish communists, such as the writer Bruno Jasensky. Together with the CHECKPOINT, its components were defeated: the Communist Party of Western Ukraine and the Communist Party of Western Belarus.

On August 16, 1938, the Executive Committee of the Comintern declared the Polish Communist Party "saboteur" and voted for its dissolution[8]. After the dissolution, Polish Communists continued to operate in trade unions and other public organizations. In January 1942, former members of the KPP led by Marcel Novotko, Pavel Finder, Malgorzata Fornalska, Boleslav Moloec and others initiated the creation of the Polish Workers' Party. In 1956, the CPSU, the Communist Party of Italy, the Communist Party of Bulgaria, the Communist Party of Finland and the Polish United Workers' Party in a joint statement recognized the dissolution of the KPP in 1938 as unjustified[5].

 

Without Soviet presence they meant nothing. Even as a nominal resistance force under occupation they meant nothing compared to other forces, like the Home Army.

Posted
1 minute ago, Roman Alymov said:

No, as Soviet Union was only founded in 1922, two years later :) In 1920, there was still Civil War in Russia....

Potato, potato.

Posted
5 minutes ago, urbanoid said:

Without Soviet presence they meant nothing. Even as a nominal resistance force under occupation they meant nothing compared to other forces, like the Home Army.

Again, we could debate to what extent it was the result of repressions by Polish state (that was, obviously, not "communist-friendly", despite of very existance of independent Poland was sideeffect of Reds prevailing in Civil War in Russia).

Posted
21 hours ago, Roman Alymov said:

North Korea is so advanced on high tech that their soldiers are able to connect to Internet without devices, by bare brain effort? The most obvious thing any reasonable military do when moving troops on classified mission is to prevent soldiers from using (and having) any sort of mobile devices that could be connected to Internet (and even cellular network).

 

You'd think so but we're talking about any military across the globe - "there's stupid, and then there's Army stupid"

 

IKYK

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Roman Alymov said:

Again, we could debate to what extent it was the result of repressions by Polish state (that was, obviously, not "communist-friendly", despite of very existance of independent Poland was sideeffect of Reds prevailing in Civil War in Russia).

To an extent that after the war Stalin needed quite a lot of actual Soviets brought on the armor of Soviet tanks to fill in positions in the state administration, army and secret services. 

Given that local communists considered themselves loyal to the Soviet Union, not Poland, tolerating their activities was pretty much out of the question. Not that extreme nationalists were particularly tolerated either.

IIRC the interwar Poland redistributed more land to the peasants than the communists after 1945, there really was no reason to look to the communists for 'salvation', even less so after USSR started killing Poles for being Poles (that included Polish communists who fled to USSR).

Edited by urbanoid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...