Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Roman Alymov

    16005

  • Stuart Galbraith

    11311

  • glenn239

    5021

  • Josh

    3789

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Surface laid mines (just barely visible on video), which were a reason driver stepped on breakes, so doubled TM-62 or equivalent at most. Reason explosion looks bigger is that more than one mine exploded, which often happens with surface laid mines (but those additional ones don't really affect vehicle) and also IMO fuel from vehicle contributed to explosion looking bigger than it is. Here is another angle, from a FPV drone chasing that Strf 90, you can actually see explosions of multiple mines and explosion of the vehicle being enchanted by the fuel, as explosion of the other mine on the left dissipates much more quickly.

https://t.me/lost_armour/3467

Posted
On 9/21/2024 at 1:50 PM, Stuart Galbraith said:

This has to be a wind up, right?

 

 

 

too good to be true. Let's add the crews of the Kusnetzoff, the Peter the Great, projects 1164, projects 956 and other obsolete ships. all the superfluous ground personnel and admirers that could be used in something more useful for the ground war that exists at the moment. At least three marine brigades could be formed. But bureaucratic inertia and vested interests will be stronger as always.

Posted (edited)

The formation of marine infantry units from unneeded sailors is an old Russian Soviet tradition. The sailors are considered particularly motivated soldiers who throw themselves into battle without considering their lives. Because they are clueless. The unfortunate boys will probably also be given a motivational injection 'Great Patriotic War V.02'

Edited by Stefan Kotsch
Posted

Eh, the invasion of Norway saw similar incidents without Russian involvement.

Posted
2 hours ago, Stefan Kotsch said:

The formation of marine infantry units from unneeded sailors is an old Russian Soviet tradition. The sailors are considered particularly motivated soldiers who throw themselves into battle without considering their lives. Because they are clueless. The unfortunate boys will probably also be given a motivational injection 'Great Patriotic War V.02'

A bit like the 3  German Marine Infantry Divisions?

Posted

But these french 'Marine Fusiliers' were already 'infantrymen on board'. That's a little different than putting a rifle in the hands of sailors.

Posted
3 hours ago, Stefan Kotsch said:

The formation of marine infantry units from unneeded sailors is an old Russian Soviet tradition. The sailors are considered particularly motivated soldiers who throw themselves into battle without considering their lives. Because they are clueless. The unfortunate boys will probably also be given a motivational injection 'Great Patriotic War V.02'

   Not sure about other countries, but in Russian tradition since at least late Russian Empire time sailors were selected from general conscript mass on the criterea of, first and foremost, education (as they were supposed to be then trained into operating complex machinery), and then health. The same by the way, decades later, became the practice for VDV (to the degree of having all-students/univercity graduate battalions).   Having better then average education allowed improvised marine units not only to operate more complex weapons then regular infantry (for example, urban legend is SVT was disliked by regular infantry but loved by Marines), but also to use more complex tactics, topography, and in general learn all sort of war tricks quicker. The stronger morale/motivation was also the product of education (as it was the people educated enough to read books and know life outside of peasant "bubble"). 

     In modern days, this difference in education level is not so big (compared to the time of Civil War and WW2), but is still present.

Posted

This video claims these strikes have been part of a concerted campaign, and are claimed ot have destroyed up to 6 months worth of ammunition, including newly delivered North Korean missiles (probably did them a favour there, heh).

 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Stuart Galbraith said:

This video claims these strikes have been part of a concerted campaign, and are claimed ot have destroyed up to 6 months worth of ammunition, including newly delivered North Korean missiles (probably did them a favour there, heh).

So it means that current production and purchase of ammunition by Russia is so massive it is not only enough for supplying current frontline use, but is also enough to stock up AT LEAST 6 month worth of extra ammunition?  (note the storages attacked are not all storages in Russia)

Compare that to German army has ammo for only two days of war – media — RT World News

Posted

No, it means that after you use up the ammunition already with units, you are going to have to look for 6 months of ammuntion.

I should check ebay, they are always selling weird shit.

Yeah well, this is the NATO threat you had to invade Ukraine to ward off apparently. Yet another dumb decision from a guy replete with them. You cant have it both ways. You cant ridicule the threat, or it makes Ukraine look unnecessary. You cant talk up NATO, without withdrawning all units facing NATO and sending them south to Ukraine as being a bit of a strange decision. Why, to hear you guys talk, Poland is about ready to go and take Belarus, and Germany about to retake Kaliningrad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...