Roman Alymov Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 P.S. For comparison - drone video of roof collapsing after 152mm Krasnopol' guided projectile hit https://t.me/infomil_live/7884
Roman Alymov Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 (edited) Yesterday video from Kiev of what is claimed to be missile shot down and falling https://t.me/rezident_ua/23420 Edited July 9, 2024 by Roman Alymov
Stefan Kotsch Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 (edited) Something enjoyable. Really cool man. Turn the sound up! https://x.com/memagram/status/1810674877378056609 Edited July 9, 2024 by Stefan Kotsch
Roman Alymov Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 13 minutes ago, txtree99 said: Another drone found by locals in Volgograd region
glenn239 Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 4 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Two more HIMARS launchers hit by Iskander while preparing to launch (ATACMS? see elevation angle) from highway near Novopetrovka, Kherson region https://t.me/The_Wrong_Side/17005 Indonesian version of RusMod video from previous night showing what is claimed to be the strike on the same three HIMARS launchers that were involved in attack on Sevastopol Uncut video on TG https://t.me/boris_rozhin/129400 That's 5 HIMARs in a few days?
Roman Alymov Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 4 minutes ago, glenn239 said: That's 5 HIMARs in a few days? In two days. But it is claims, who knows if it is real HIMARS, not decoys etc. Anyway, no doubt any HIMARS launchers losses will be quickly compensated by US&Co.
Stuart Galbraith Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 4 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Note this version of the picture is far better quality then on original screenshot, leaving large field of guesses what magic have improved it Anyway, claimed deathtoll of two (2) is not matching direct strike by 400kg warhead. Note the roof was not blown high and away, but just collapsed down and was later just moved away by crowd on hands That video frame you picked is very clearly not the same frame. And yes, ive seen video quality change that much between frames, so it proves nothing.
txtree99 Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 https://x.com/noelreports/status/1810623277359911246?s=61&t=IZXtqtU-ivwfbke5UMfWTA
Der Zeitgeist Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 51 minutes ago, Stuart Galbraith said: That video frame you picked is very clearly not the same frame. And yes, ive seen video quality change that much between frames, so it proves nothing. Don't bother. Roman isn't stupid, he knows this was a Russian cruise missile.
Josh Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 55 minutes ago, txtree99 said: I would assume. I would suspect an artillery hit from a smaller caliber, maybe a mortar. I would think anything with an actually HEAT warhead would have totaled the vehicle.
Yama Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 6 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Also note that as pro-Ukrainians are out of Tochka-Us, claims of "Russians using Tochka-U missiles" is also down to none. Occam's razor points out that it's more likely that Russians are out of Tochka-U's... Any recent sightings of North Korean missiles?
Yama Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 2 hours ago, glenn239 said: That's 5 HIMARs in a few days? Can't see the second video, but in the first I just see three long vehicles, which might be HIMARS or some other type of MLRS, but might also be say, tankers.
crazyinsane105 Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Yama said: Occam's razor points out that it's more likely that Russians are out of Tochka-U's... Any recent sightings of North Korean missiles? Apparently the batch the Russians had ran out. Some Ukrainians are saying the accuracy was too low that Russia stopped using them entirely but that doesn’t make much sense to me. They’d still launch them at Ukraine regardless how inaccurate they are, and in the opening days of their use, the missiles were scoring direct hits on Ukrainian military facilities Edited July 9, 2024 by crazyinsane105
Roman Alymov Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 29 minutes ago, Yama said: Occam's razor points out that it's more likely that Russians are out of Tochka-U's... Any recent sightings of North Korean missiles? That is not razor at all, since it was iniginally idea that since Russia is out of relatively new Iskander missiles and can't produce them in adequate quantity due to economy weakness and Western sanctions, it will be increasing number of old Tichka-U used instead of Iskanders. But nothing like that happened: only few cases were claimed by pro-Ukrainians as "Russians using Tochka-U" and that was it - no massive use at all (despite of in theory there should be far morfe Tochka-Us in stock then Iskanders).
Roman Alymov Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 Meanwhile Saudi Arabia plays own game https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-09/saudi-arabia-veiled-threat-to-g7-over-russia-assets Saudis Warned G-7 Over Russia Seizures With Debt Sale Threat Since it is obvious West can't "return" Russian assets (they do not exist), i wonder what is KSA plan and goals....
urbanoid Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 3 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Meanwhile Saudi Arabia plays own game https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-09/saudi-arabia-veiled-threat-to-g7-over-russia-assets Saudis Warned G-7 Over Russia Seizures With Debt Sale Threat Since it is obvious West can't "return" Russian assets (they do not exist), i wonder what is KSA plan and goals.... Most likely getting some concession after which they'll drop their opposition to such a measure.
mkenny Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 (edited) 3 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Meanwhile Saudi Arabia plays own game https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-09/saudi-arabia-veiled-threat-to-g7-over-russia-assets Saudis Warned G-7 Over Russia Seizures With Debt Sale Threat Since it is obvious West can't "return" Russian assets (they do not exist), i wonder what is KSA plan and goals.... It is behind a paywall but this isn't https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/saudi-arabia-threatened-sell-european-debt-if-g-7-seized-russian-assets-report Edited July 9, 2024 by mkenny
bojan Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 (edited) 10 hours ago, Roman Alymov said: Note this version of the picture is far better quality then on original screenshot, leaving large field of guesses what magic have improved it... Angle is different, so it is taken by something/someone else. Photo also does not have any signs of manipulation. Quote Anyway, claimed deathtoll of two (2) is not matching direct strike by 400kg warhead. Note the roof was not blown high and away, but just collapsed down and was later just moved away by crowd on hands Agree that damage is too limited for 400kg warhead, but it is also too much for AIM-120 20kg warhead (out of which less then half is explosives - in all effects similar to single 122mm shell at best). So in the case of two choices, one unlikely (partial detonation of warhead, not unheard of thing) and impossible one (20kg warhead collapsing building like that) - I know which I will choose to believe in, unless some better evidence (like pic of larger AD missile) than comparison using bad pixelated pic is showed. Edited July 9, 2024 by bojan
bojan Posted July 9, 2024 Posted July 9, 2024 (edited) 5 hours ago, Josh said: I would assume. I would suspect an artillery hit from a smaller caliber, maybe a mortar. My bet also, it probably hit it from above, between main armor* and add on (empty space between add-on steel plate and base sloped armor is open from a top, which explains both removal of add-on and breaking through of main armor. *Main armor in that place is only IIRC 1" aluminium, about 10mm equivalent in steel so 120mm mortar shell would have no problem breaking it in that way. Edited July 9, 2024 by bojan
crazyinsane105 Posted July 10, 2024 Posted July 10, 2024 4 hours ago, urbanoid said: Most likely getting some concession after which they'll drop their opposition to such a measure. Or it’s possible they want to ensure the same won’t happen to them in the future, so they are acting proactively now
crazyinsane105 Posted July 10, 2024 Posted July 10, 2024 3 hours ago, bojan said: Angle is different, so it is taken by something/someone else. Photo also does not have any signs of manipulation. Agree that damage is too limited for 400kg warhead, but it is also too much for AIM-120 20kg warhead (out of which less then half is explosives - in all effects similar to single 122mm shell at best). So in the case of two choices, one unlikely (partial detonation of warhead, not unheard of thing) and impossible one (20kg warhead collapsing building like that) - I know which I will choose to believe in, unless some better evidence (like pic of larger AD missile) than comparison using bad pixelated pic is showed. Patriot SAM has around a 200 pound warhead, but pics aren’t relevant to that of a Patriot. Interested to note why Russians aren’t trying to overwhelm Patriot batteries around Kiev and instead target other areas. More or less concept is same: missiles are flying extremely low to avoid detection until last minute. Unlikely that Patriot batteries will stand a chance against such an attack
seahawk Posted July 10, 2024 Posted July 10, 2024 2 hours ago, crazyinsane105 said: Patriot SAM has around a 200 pound warhead, but pics aren’t relevant to that of a Patriot. Interested to note why Russians aren’t trying to overwhelm Patriot batteries around Kiev and instead target other areas. More or less concept is same: missiles are flying extremely low to avoid detection until last minute. Unlikely that Patriot batteries will stand a chance against such an attack In fact Russia has created a huge gap in the IADS of the Ukraine in the last weeks. More successful strikes will follow. The Ukrainian cities will bleed.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now