Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, bojan said:

Fake from DSC.

 

For the love of god, apply some critical thinking when posting things.

Maybe its the F-35 out of Poland that I was theorizing on that shot that SU down? LOL

  • Replies 96.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Roman Alymov

    16007

  • Stuart Galbraith

    11311

  • glenn239

    5021

  • Josh

    3789

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
30 minutes ago, Perun said:

I am Slav from Croatia, could you please explain this

Do the words Josef Stalin, KGB/NKVD, and Gulags sound familiar to you?

Posted
6 minutes ago, On the way said:

I think the Israelis made the decision some time ago that between the Assad regime and various ISIS and terror related groups that the regime is fighting, the regime is the lesser of the evils. Hence any country that militarily aids the regime is indirectly a friend of Israel. They are not going to support an enemy of this friend.

I will not be so sure:

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/three-soldiers-killed-in-israeli-rocket-attack-on-damascus-syrian-tv-2785833

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-syria-israel-attacks-targets-in-southern-damascus-overnight-1.10617237

Posted
3 minutes ago, bojan said:

No Z on the vehicle, Strela-10 (old version also...) alone in the enemy territory... Suspicious if those are Russian.

But you know that not all vehicles of Novorussia invasion forces got Z painted on it's sides, don't you?

Posted

Bojan has a point though that there is a lot of misidentification going on, which was perhaps bound to happen what with both sides using similar (in many cases the same) equipment.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Przezdzieblo said:

But you know that not all vehicles of Novorussia invasion forces got Z painted on it's sides, don't you?

those vehicles are shown on another video with killed russians in ukrainian uniforms..

Posted
Just now, jaro said:

those vehicles are shown on another video with killed russians in ukrainian uniforms..

Some better evidence for that will have to be presented other than "someone said it so on twitter".

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Stuart Galbraith said:

Got a link?

 

Original video, first one to be uploaded. Go to youtube and read author's comment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBBJ_JzV8u4&t=22s

 

Took 30 seconds of google to find it.

Edited by bojan
Posted
9 minutes ago, Przezdzieblo said:

But you know that not all vehicles of Novorussia invasion forces got Z painted on it's sides, don't you?

So Novorussian Strela-10 got from Donetsk/Lugansk all the way to Kiev?

Only thing I know is that I am not 100% sure whose vehicle it is. You are certain it is Russian. Evidence?

Posted

bojan, as a researcher you probably understand, that there is a bit too early for document-rich monograph book about this invasion. There are few vids on Strela rolling-over civil car and Ural track with men in Ukrainian uniforms examined by other armed men. It was same location, same time. It should be easy to find.

So, what is a letter painted on 'technika' that is invading from Belarus territory if it is not Z?

Posted

Back in the Soviet times tanks and other armoured vehicles had a white cross painted on there tank hulls for identify, friend or foe purposes.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Laser Shark said:

Bojan has a point though that there is a lot of misidentification going on, which was perhaps bound to happen what with both sides using similar (in many cases the same) equipment.

I have learned from 1999. with both local and NATO claims of kills. :D

It is far less embarrassing to say that you don't know whose vehicle it is instead of parroting someone's twatter.

2 minutes ago, Przezdzieblo said:

...There are few vids on Strela rolling-over civil car and Ural track with men in Ukrainian uniforms examined by other armed men....

Accidents like those happen even in peacetime. Visibility out of MT-LB is poor with visors down (as was case here), especially to the side. We see that vehicle took a turn and hit the car, nothing more. We don't know whose vehicle is that. We don't know if it was accident or deliberate thing. Etc. So I would rather reserve judgment, if for nothing else than for the sake of seriousness of forum discussion.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, jaro said:

https://www.facebook.com/anton.gerashchenko.7/videos/281748763923443

here.. killed saboteurs in Ukrainian uniforms.. SA-10 is visible for a brief moment, anyway its the same place..

Again, what evidence there is those are "saboteurs"?

Edited by bojan
Posted

there were reports of Russians using two captured Ukrainian trucks riding fast towards Kiyv in front of other Russian vehicles... if you are so good with google, why dont you look it up yourself???

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, jaro said:

there were reports of Russians using two captured Ukrainian trucks riding fast towards Kiyv in front of other Russian vehicles... if you are so good with google, why dont you look it up yourself???

"Reports" =/= evidence. There were all sorts of reports about shot down NATO aircrafts in 1999., do you also believe those? Baghdad Bob reported a lot of things. Again what happened?

It is war and everyone is lying, either deliberately or by not realizing what is happening. Trust only evidence that can be verified, and everything uncertain will be proven one way or other in due time. It is not that you, or I or someone else from forum is actually fighting this war, so waiting some time to clear things will cost us nothing and will add to a quality of discussion.

 

Edited by bojan
Posted

I absolutely agree with Bojan. Unless this information is checked and confirmed twice or thrice, it is considered doubtful. Anything else would be unprofessional.

Posted

Well, that Strela hit a car, rolled-over it and then went back, rolling-over it again. And drive away, like nothing happened. For sure it was because of poor visibility with visors down - which, lets say for sake of discussion seriousness, for sure must be peacetime practice.

But ok, bojan, you got your points. Novorussian invasion on independent Ukraine is nothing important. Let the world feel sorry for 1999. Ukrainians too.

 

Baghdad Bob? Of course. Look, it is he, just saying: "Reports about US troops in Baghdad are not evidence!".

Comical Ali / Baghdad Bob: Image Gallery (List View) | Know Your Meme

 

 

Posted

Well if people are too concerned about being percieved as posting bad infor, then near nothing gets posted. And in someway, knowing the fake stuff has value too.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Przezdzieblo said:

...But ok, bojan, you got your points. Novorussian invasion on independent Ukraine is nothing important. Let the world feel sorry for 1999. Ukrainians too...

Do not put words I have not said in my mouth.

Quote

Baghdad Bob? Of course. Look, it is he, just saying: "Reports about US troops in Baghdad are not evidence!".

Reduction ad absurdum. Reports are not evidence unless verified by pics or video.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...