Jump to content

Good Old Fashioned Tank P*rn


Mr King

Recommended Posts

On 5/31/2024 at 11:11 AM, Damian said:

Some action at Bemowo Piskie Training Area.

I have to wonder how much these drills account for the actual combat conditions in Ukraine.  Are they presuming that NATO airpower will keep OPFOR surveillance and artillery in check?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

What do you think about this?

They say 4-men crew. But also an autoloader, so I assume the 4th crewman is some systems' operator (they call him deputy commander). He gets the RCWS, which I assume also entails special C-UAS training. Operation of the LMs is something indeed a gunner shouldn't do, considering their task to loiter and not just strike. But this could also be easily relegated to someone else, perhaps a dedicated weapons operator in a nearby APC/IFV. Sensors? This is not really a serious cognitive burden. Gunner and commander already do that, and new sensors are added with the understanding that additional workload is handled by automated systems and narrowed down for the crew, including input from conventional sensors. An interesting sensor type would be some ELINT system that could try identify clusters of enemies based on emissions. But is that needed on every individual vehicle? I'm not sure. It could be on a single vehicle per platoon. If the effectors are electronic, then that's where I see where perhaps a new crewman is needed.

In the context of the French army a 4-man crew is unacceptable (for an upgrade to Leclerc), but this could be a marketing pitch for armed forces accustomed to 4 crewmen. 

 

GQQMuUlWgAAT8s2?format=jpg&name=large

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I heard, the French were moving back to a crew of four in the interests of overall efficiency of the crew.  It certainly makes all the general tasks of running a vehicle easier and reduces fatigue levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not exactly a tank, but an example of creative recycling of AFV components.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serbian "Kerber" ("Cerberus") 3 x 20mm RWS on Cypriot Leonidas APC:

Hmu8jKl.jpeg

lh5tV2z.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2024 at 10:30 AM, bojan said:

Serbian "Kerber" ("Cerberus") 3 x 20mm RWS on Cypriot Leonidas APC:

Hmu8jKl.jpeg

lh5tV2z.jpeg

 

Would a revolver cannon or Gatling gun be more efficient in terms of space and, maybe, rate of fire? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, maybe not but idea in this case is to convert Cyprus towed triple 20mm AA guns to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Rick said:

Would a revolver cannon or Gatling gun be more efficient in terms of space and, maybe, rate of fire? 

The Hispano HS.404/804 is a notably compact weapon, and the ammunition supply system in that mount seems to be one drum per gun, i.e. all you see is all that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sunday said:

The Hispano HS.404/804 is a notably compact weapon, and the ammunition supply system in that mount seems to be one drum per gun, i.e. all you see is all that is.

As usual, I did not know this. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...