lastdingo Posted November 23, 2017 Posted November 23, 2017 Go back to school and learn to comprehend English texts.
rmgill Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 If there is a SCOTUS ruling which you feel conflicts with your view, presumably there is also a SCOTUS ruling you feel that conforms with your view. Knowing what I know about SCOTUS rulings on this subject I KNOW that there are SCOTUS rulings that the antigun crowd likes to cite as conforming with and supporting their views but they rarely understand those rulings. Learn some basic logic.
lastdingo Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Well, logic isn't exactly my weak spot. But I see you moved on instead of understanding what the challenge was about. That's one way to deal with text comprehension issues. BTW, interesting to see this insistence on SCOTUS rulings. It befits a country that has a rule of law. Can the right wing reconcile this with its abortion stance and support for Moore? Looks like the right wing is cherrypicking to me. SCOTUS agrees = SCOTUS ruling is end point of discussion, dissenters shall shut up! SCOTUS disagrees = let's work around it, if not disrespect SCOTUS rulings outright and vote one of us into office who has violated the rule of law repeatedly and was defiant to SCOTUS orders. But I digress. This was a better fit for the 'hypocrisy of the right' thread.
Mr King Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Well, logic isn't exactly my weak spot. Who says Germans don't have a sense of humor.
lastdingo Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Well, logic isn't exactly my weak spot. Who says Germans don't have a sense of humor. I notice you have nothing of substance to add.
Mr King Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 I notice you have nothing of substance to add. I am fresh out till the new year.
CT96 Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Wait... there was substance to this discussion? I thought this was a strawman and windmill only zone.
Mike Steele Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Wait... there was substance to this discussion? I thought this was a strawman and windmill only zone. Not so you'd notice. Currently were being lectured about US law by dingo.....
Jeff Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Wait... there was substance to this discussion? I thought this was a strawman and windmill only zone. Not so you'd notice. Currently were being lectured about US law by dingo..... I thought he was Brian?
Mike Steele Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Wait... there was substance to this discussion? I thought this was a strawman and windmill only zone. Not so you'd notice. Currently were being lectured about US law by dingo..... I thought he was Brian? Well, I think so, but I can't convince anybody, except maybe you.....
Panzermann Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Wait... there was substance to this discussion? I thought this was a strawman and windmill only zone.
CT96 Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Wait... there was substance to this discussion? I thought this was a strawman and windmill only zone. Excellent! We have a logo for the thread!
Ssnake Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 Ritter von Traurigegestaltaufrosinante zu Windmühlenlanzenstecher
lastdingo Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 I accept your surrender on all things substantial in the most graceful manner possible to me and leave to you guys the undisputed control of the ad hominem playground.
Brian Kennedy Posted November 27, 2017 Posted November 27, 2017 (edited) Fake new lolz https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic--and-false--tale-about-roy-moore-sje-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/2017/11/27/0c2e335a-cfb6-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.e454bbe9f179 Edit: damn, I hadnt realized what an eevul genius OKeefe is! http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/conservative-fails-to-prove-washington-post-is-fake-news.html Edited November 27, 2017 by Brian Kennedy
toysoldier Posted November 28, 2017 Posted November 28, 2017 How do you say Don Quixote in German? The quijote is either the thig piece of plate armor, or the articulated skirts on both sides.
Panzermann Posted November 28, 2017 Posted November 28, 2017 (edited) How do you say Don Quixote in German?The quijote is either the thig piece of plate armor, or the articulated skirts on both sides. Di(e)chlinge in german.. though Ssnake's translation is also correct in a way, because Don Quixote is also called the "knight of the sad guise". Normally just called by his olde fashioned spanish name "Donn Kischotte" as in the novel. no x->j consonant shift edit: or you could say Herr Eisenschenkel more poetically Edited December 8, 2017 by Panzermann
lastdingo Posted December 7, 2017 Posted December 7, 2017 "I Saw the Kate Steinle Murder Trial Up Close. The Jury Didn’t Botch It."By PHIL VAN STOCKUM December 06, 2017 https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/06/kate-steinle-murder-trial-jury-didnt-botch-216016 Compare the measured, objective and diligent approach of the replacement juror who wrote the article with the hostile comments by right wingers that it sparked. I saw such conflicts many times. This is simply no sensible dialogue in any way. Large parts of the not politically apathetic/abstaining population in the U.S. appear to have become unable to comprehend or even only reasonably converse with each other.And this court case shouldn't even be political !
mnm Posted December 9, 2017 Posted December 9, 2017 Ritter von Traurigegestaltaufrosinante zu WindmühlenlanzenstecherGo fly a kite, my Langenscheidt says that's Welsh for Wells Fargo & Co GmbH.
Mike Steele Posted December 9, 2017 Posted December 9, 2017 Ritter von Traurigegestaltaufrosinante zu WindmühlenlanzenstecherGo fly a kite, my Langenscheidt says that's Welsh for Wells Fargo & Co GmbH.
Der Zeitgeist Posted January 27, 2018 Posted January 27, 2018 Happiness isn't easy to come by these days.
rmgill Posted January 27, 2018 Posted January 27, 2018 DZ, I think you might be confused as to whom is contradictory in positions. It's not PJW. It's the neo-marxist regressives.
Der Zeitgeist Posted January 27, 2018 Posted January 27, 2018 DZ, I think you might be confused as to whom is contradictory in positions. It's not PJW. It's the neo-marxist regressives. You know, I have actually seen communism, and you don't know what you're talking about.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now