AETiglathPZ Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 (edited) Hmmm, tank militia. I can see it now. We can revamp the girl scouts since sugar for those cookies will be illegal anyways too, soon. It would make our girls and women more polite, graceful, modest, and gallant. To train a female militia on tankery would bring out the best in the feminine, intense and strong like its iron, adorable like the clattering of its track, and passionate and precise like its main cannon. To train our daughters in tankery will make them a better wife, a better mother, and a better female worker. They will be healthier, kinder, stronger, and men from all over will like them. Edited December 27, 2012 by AETiglathPZ
FlyingCanOpener Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Girls und Panzer? Chapter and verse.
AETiglathPZ Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 (edited) Girls und Panzer? Chapter and verse. The best damn anime to come out in a long time! I got a female, self described feminist, into that show. She would be a hell of a looker in one of those skirts. Edited December 27, 2012 by AETiglathPZ
Archie Pellagio Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 there was for a while a chronic shortage of large bore plastic conduit - the stuff about 15cm across - in Australia, as gun owners buried in the bush the weapons that were no longer legal. Actually in one way I know that this is unlawful, but in another way, if a gun is buried someone in the bush it at least means that it isn't available for someone else to steal, or for its owner to grab out of a cupboard and use in anger. You go out somewhere like Beaudesert and you can't sink a hole without finding a PVC pipe with gats ready to duke it out with the Musorians...
Dawes Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Shoulda seen this coming when New York City banned large sugary drinks.
JWB Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Journalists’ Addresses Posted In Revenge For Newspaper’s Google Map Of Gun Permit Owners http://techcrunch.co...?ncid=webmail13
Rocky Davis Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Sell your "regular" weapon to the LAPD in exchange for $100 worth of groceries and sell your "assault" weapon to the LAPD for $200 worth of groceries: http://news.yahoo.com/la-offers-groceries-guns-annual-buyback-202748214.html Sympathy for gun crime violence is one thing . . . but, feeling that you have to disarm yourself for your sympathies is nearly incomprehensible to me. I mean, why does a gun owner in LA feel the need to turn his weapon in because of violent crimes in New York? Are these people selling their wepaons to the LAPD afraid they, or members of their families, will imitate these crimes using those personally owned weapons? That's almost like having so much sympathy for a rape victim elsewhere that you feel the need to castrate yourself in sympathy and support.
Max H Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Anyone think they could machine a sten for under $200? Or maybe an FP-45 liberator replica for under $100?
Josh Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 The liberator probably. One has to wonder how functional the weapon has to be for it to pass muster.
Mike Steele Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Anyone think they could machine a sten for under $200? Or maybe an FP-45 liberator replica for under $100? With modern materials, you could get away with a lot less. But then you would be breaking the law. Only criminals do that.
EchoFiveMike Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Anyone think they could machine a sten for under $200? Or maybe an FP-45 liberator replica for under $100? Think? I know I can machine Stens for far less if I'm not billing for labor. The only marginally difficult part is rifling and magazines. There used to be Sten kits with milling templates already on a piece of tubing for sale under $150 with a couple mags. Mill the tubing(Hell, you could do it with a hand grinder or file if you're really hard up) throw a couple of welds on it and you're done. S/F....Ken M
Ivanhoe Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 I have heard of guys buying up a whole box full of Lorcins and other trash handguns at $25-50 each to sell to the city gov't during these buyback programs. The break-even point on exploiting brainless symbolic gestures is quite low.
EchoFiveMike Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 The local gun stores clean out their garbage cases when the gun buy backs occur. If it's simply fleecing idiots, I pay no mind. If the guncontrol asshats are spending taxpayer money, I'm bothered by it. S/F....Ken M
medicjim86 Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 somehow, we need to convince them that other items warrant buy back... hazmat, knives, old washing machines
rmgill Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 http://www.quickmeme.com/search/?q=david%20gregory
DKTanker Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Notice in Dianne's bill that positive photo ID and a fingerprint are required to legally register a weapon. Just so we are clear, to own a firearm the banishers would treat citizens exercising their 2nd amendment right in the manner that criminals are treated, photographed and fingerprinted. However, these same people demand that people not have to be subject to so much as a photo ID to vote. Let us not mistake this as a one time deal...no, no. As this bill would strengthen the prior ASW Ban and prohibit ever greater numbers of firearms, you can bet your bottom dollar should this come to pass, just a few years down the road even more will be prohibited, perhaps even doing away with grandfather clauses. Here's the upshot. All this talk of ever more stringent regulation and registration will cause weapon sales to explode to an even greater amount. Years ago, before military service, I was an avid hunter owning or having access to several rifles and shotguns. Over the years I've given some away and sold others so that today I don't own so much as my boyhood BB gun and I haven't held much less shot any weapon of any type since I retired from the military in 1995. Firearms banishers know this, I will be procuring a personal arsenal and ammunition over the next few months. Simply put, you and your brethren scare the hell out of me. Your wanting so badly to remove weapons from otherwise innocent people speaks to a greater evil and alterior motives. http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weapons
Garth Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Notice in Dianne's bill ... http://www.feinstein...assault-weapons It should be recalled that when her life was threatened (by a terrorist group), DiFi became one of only a half dozen to a dozen San Franciscans holding an unrestricted concealed carry permit. And when the threat abated she publicly turned in her handgun during a gun buy back. Well, at least one of her handguns. She had two. The cheap one was turned in, but she kept the .357.
Rocky Davis Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Wow . . . one moment, she (Feinstein) plays up to gun owners by saying that those currently legally possessing one of the weapons whose sale is to be banned by her proposed legislation need not worry, because those weapons will be "grandfathered" with reference to her proposed law. The next moment, she says that all weapons "grandfathered" (already owned prior to enactment of her proposed legislation), will have to be registered with the Federal Government as such:Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include: Background check of owner and any transferee; Type and serial number of the firearm; Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint; Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registrationFirst, I'll try and lure you in with the carrot, then I'll bash your head with the stick. What a sick f**k she is (but then again, she always has been).
Paul G. Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 http://www.quickmeme...david%20gregory Just talking about this... As District of Columbia police investigate NBC News' David Gregory for apparently holding up a restricted high-capacity magazine on his weekly Sunday show, the police department claims NBC was told in advance that the prop was "not permissible." Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/26/dc-police-investigating-nbc-gregory-over-purported-high-capacity-magazine-on/#ixzz2GHXBcgVB http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/26/dc-police-investigating-nbc-gregory-over-purported-high-capacity-magazine-on/
X-Files Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 (edited) Posted on an anti-2A blog, instruction to their faithful about an upcoming protest - One note on the goals and the signs: I know that many of you are against all guns, hunting, etc. and that's fine. But I would prefer that this protest be specifically against military-style assault weapons. Most gun owners do NOT own these types of guns and in fact are as against them as we are. But the gun lobby has done a remarkable job convincing gun owners that all gun laws are aimed at their guns so we need to be careful of the message we are sending. I was an NRA member for many years and thus know exactly how they operate. I chose this gun show as a protest venue because gun show attendees tend to be the real die-hard gun nuts and not casual gun owners (like me). So, I am asking that whatever signs you make contain messages that specifically reference semi-automatic weapons and not other guns. Edited December 27, 2012 by X-Files
BP Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Posted on an anti-2A blog, instruction to their faithful about an upcoming protest - One note on the goals and the signs: I know that many of you are against all guns, hunting, etc. and that's fine. But I would prefer that this protest be specifically against military-style assault weapons. 1. Most gun owners do NOT own these types of guns and in fact are as against them as we are. 2. But the gun lobby has done a remarkable job convincing gun owners that all gun laws are aimed at their guns so we need to be careful of the message we are sending. I was an NRA member for many years and thus know exactly how they operate. I chose this gun show as a protest venue because gun show attendees tend to be the real die-hard gun nuts and not casual gun owners (like me). So, I am asking that whatever signs you make contain messages that specifically reference semi-automatic weapons and not other guns. 1a. That's their fault.1b. Bullshit.2. These statist toadies have shown their true colors again, and again, and again, and again. . . there is no "good faith", nor "negotiating". It's just steady chip-chip-chipping at actual real, enumerated rights (not the bullshit "rights" modern people come up with).
X-Files Posted December 27, 2012 Posted December 27, 2012 Posted on an anti-2A blog, instruction to their faithful about an upcoming protest - One note on the goals and the signs: I know that many of you are against all guns, hunting, etc. and that's fine. But I would prefer that this protest be specifically against military-style assault weapons. 1. Most gun owners do NOT own these types of guns and in fact are as against them as we are. 2. But the gun lobby has done a remarkable job convincing gun owners that all gun laws are aimed at their guns so we need to be careful of the message we are sending. I was an NRA member for many years and thus know exactly how they operate. I chose this gun show as a protest venue because gun show attendees tend to be the real die-hard gun nuts and not casual gun owners (like me). So, I am asking that whatever signs you make contain messages that specifically reference semi-automatic weapons and not other guns. 1a. That's their fault.1b. Bullshit.2. These statist toadies have shown their true colors again, and again, and again, and again. . . there is no "good faith", nor "negotiating". It's just steady chip-chip-chipping at actual real, enumerated rights (not the bullshit "rights" modern people come up with). Oh no, this is just about the Sudetenland - only the Sudetenland!
chino Posted December 28, 2012 Posted December 28, 2012 (edited) Not having grown up in a free country, this topic of gun control is for me an eye opener to what is the meaning of liberty in America for many of you here. I can imagine being able to openly and legally own firearms is indeed a very liberating experience. I love firearms. I just never associated gun ownership anything as my only experience with firearms is in the military, which is nothing like civilian ownership of firearms. If I'm a US citizen, I would have one firearm for every room in the house. And once I have one, or twelve, I can imagine I wouldn't be too pleased if someone wants to take it away either. How long can you store ammo? Do you need specially constructed storage rooms to make your ammo store longer? Edited December 28, 2012 by chino
Recommended Posts