CaptLuke Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 (edited) 10 hours ago, KV7 said: Two tank platoons or sections is probably optimal for urban warfare. Any more and you will often struggle to find any way to keep them in contact and able to see anything. For the infantry platoons it might also be that an entire two section platoon now fits in one C-2 sortie. The two section platoon both economizes on sorties and helps with unit integrity during transport. IIRC the UK Commando organization was influenced by the same idea: the sizing was such that a section (platoon) had two squads and filled one Landing Craft Assault (LCA). The Japanese organization has the same 5 maneuver companies, each of two platoons, each of two squads organization that the 1945 UK Commando did. Edited April 10, 2021 by CaptLuke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KV7 Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 For infantry formations that are restricted in size by transports you can always get a triangular formation though by using smaller squads. e.g 3 * 7 rather than 2 * 11 or 3*8 instead of 2*12. I think this is likely better, - you can have the HQ in a support squad, and then have two assault/rifle squads. For special forces you probably want an integral sniper too, and the support squad can have some stuff you usually don't see at the company level, if the unit is expected to operate independently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptLuke Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 8 hours ago, KV7 said: For infantry formations that are restricted in size by transports you can always get a triangular formation though by using smaller squads. e.g 3 * 7 rather than 2 * 11 or 3*8 instead of 2*12. I think this is likely better, - you can have the HQ in a support squad, and then have two assault/rifle squads. For special forces you probably want an integral sniper too, and the support squad can have some stuff you usually don't see at the company level, if the unit is expected to operate independently. The Japanese are in a little more constricted space than the Commandos were since they have two layers of transport: they are moving APCs in a C-2. Your approach is reasonable, but there is a tradeoff to having one squad split across two APC instead of one APC = one squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojan Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 (edited) 23 hours ago, KV7 said: Two tank platoons or sections is probably optimal for urban warfare. Any more and you will often struggle to find any way to keep them in contact and able to see anything. Three. One scans left, one right, one forward. Depending if TC is placed left or right, left one or right one will be 1st lead tank, then some distance back 2nd on the opposing side of street, then 3rd behind those two one covering front and rears of the two tank in the front. That is in probably every army's manual. Edited April 10, 2021 by bojan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KV7 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 12 hours ago, CaptLuke said: The Japanese are in a little more constricted space than the Commandos were since they have two layers of transport: they are moving APCs in a C-2. Your approach is reasonable, but there is a tradeoff to having one squad split across two APC instead of one APC = one squad. Gotcha. In that case it makes total sense. I was thinking more in terms of transport where the whole formation is in one vehicle, e.g Mi-17 or similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Peter Posted June 5, 2021 Share Posted June 5, 2021 Japan's Sherman Hunter, the Chi-Ri | Cursed by Design Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonJ Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 On 6/6/2021 at 2:38 AM, Adam Peter said: Japan's Sherman Hunter, the Chi-Ri | Cursed by Design Not so bad. Would prefer catchy phrases like "Sherman Hunter" or "Japanese panther" were not used though. Some little errors such as "Chi-Ri II" in the video was really just "design proposal 2" though, not an actual name of a finished tank like with Tiger 2 or Challenger 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Sielbeck Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futon Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 Saw that one recently. It'll be interesting to see how they get it running. Maybe they'll pull some fenders and other parts like with the muffle off from other Ha-Go ruins. Pretty sure the numbers on the side hull are indeed not Japanese numbers as I can't recall ever seeing roman letters used on any of their tanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maro.kyo Posted October 20, 2023 Share Posted October 20, 2023 Japanese APS research prototype from ATLA's Reiwa 4 (2022) promotion video. (I've set the youtube embedded link to start at the point when the prototype is shown at 5:14) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futon Posted October 20, 2023 Share Posted October 20, 2023 On 11/29/2022 at 2:19 PM, futon said: Saw that one recently. It'll be interesting to see how they get it running. Maybe they'll pull some fenders and other parts like with the muffle off from other Ha-Go ruins. Pretty sure the numbers on the side hull are indeed not Japanese numbers as I can't recall ever seeing roman letters used on any of their tanks. Correction to myself, roman letters have been used on some. The one in the video though, still unsure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futon Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 New tracked APC. https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/a48a8334f868482bf1ebe289476cab0745f035cb?page=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now