Jump to content

Japanese tanks


Kentucky-roughrider

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, KV7 said:

Two tank platoons or sections is probably optimal for urban warfare. Any more and you will often struggle to find any way to keep them in contact and able to see anything.

For the infantry platoons it might also be that an entire two section platoon now fits in one C-2 sortie.  The two section platoon both economizes on sorties and helps with unit integrity during transport.

IIRC the UK Commando organization was influenced by the same idea: the sizing was such that a section (platoon) had two squads and filled one Landing Craft Assault (LCA).

The Japanese organization has the same 5 maneuver companies, each of two platoons, each of two squads organization that the 1945 UK Commando did.

Edited by CaptLuke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 361
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

For infantry formations that are restricted in size by transports you can always get a triangular formation though by using smaller squads. e.g 3 * 7 rather than 2 * 11 or 3*8 instead of 2*12.

I think this is likely better, - you can have the HQ in a support squad, and then have two assault/rifle  squads. For special forces you probably want an integral sniper too, and the support squad can have some stuff you usually don't see at the company level, if the unit is expected to operate independently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, KV7 said:

For infantry formations that are restricted in size by transports you can always get a triangular formation though by using smaller squads. e.g 3 * 7 rather than 2 * 11 or 3*8 instead of 2*12.

I think this is likely better, - you can have the HQ in a support squad, and then have two assault/rifle  squads. For special forces you probably want an integral sniper too, and the support squad can have some stuff you usually don't see at the company level, if the unit is expected to operate independently. 

The Japanese are in a little more constricted space than the Commandos were since they have two layers of transport: they are moving APCs in a C-2.  Your approach is reasonable, but there is a tradeoff to having one squad split across two APC instead of one APC = one squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, KV7 said:

Two tank platoons or sections is probably optimal for urban warfare. Any more and you will often struggle to find any way to keep them in contact and able to see anything.

Three. One scans left, one right, one forward. Depending if TC is placed left or right, left one or right one will be 1st lead tank, then some distance back 2nd on the opposing side of street, then 3rd behind those two one covering front and rears of the two tank in the front.

That is in probably every army's manual.

Edited by bojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CaptLuke said:

The Japanese are in a little more constricted space than the Commandos were since they have two layers of transport: they are moving APCs in a C-2.  Your approach is reasonable, but there is a tradeoff to having one squad split across two APC instead of one APC = one squad.

Gotcha. In that case it makes total sense. I was thinking more in terms of transport where the whole formation is in one vehicle, e.g Mi-17 or similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 6/6/2021 at 2:38 AM, Adam Peter said:

Japan's Sherman Hunter, the Chi-Ri | Cursed by Design

Not so bad. Would prefer catchy phrases like "Sherman Hunter" or "Japanese panther" were not used though. Some little errors such as "Chi-Ri II" in the video was really just "design proposal 2" though, not an actual name of a finished tank like with Tiger 2 or Challenger 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Saw that one recently. It'll be interesting to see how they get it running. Maybe they'll pull some fenders and other parts like with the muffle off from other Ha-Go ruins. Pretty sure the numbers on the side hull are indeed not Japanese numbers as I can't recall ever seeing roman letters used on any of their tanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
On 11/29/2022 at 2:19 PM, futon said:

Saw that one recently. It'll be interesting to see how they get it running. Maybe they'll pull some fenders and other parts like with the muffle off from other Ha-Go ruins. Pretty sure the numbers on the side hull are indeed not Japanese numbers as I can't recall ever seeing roman letters used on any of their tanks. 

Correction to myself, roman letters have been used on some. The one in the video though, still unsure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...